Central European Journal of Mathematics

, Volume 11, Issue 8, pp 1392–1415 | Cite as

Adaptive multiscale scheme based on numerical density of entropy production for conservation laws

  • Mehmet Ersoy
  • Frédéric Golay
  • Lyudmyla Yushchenko
Research Article
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

We propose a 1D adaptive numerical scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws based on the numerical density of entropy production (the amount of violation of the theoretical entropy inequality). This density is used as an a posteriori error which provides information if the mesh should be refined in the regions where discontinuities occur or coarsened in the regions where the solution remains smooth. As due to the Courant-Friedrich-Levy stability condition the time step is restricted and leads to time consuming simulations, we propose a local time stepping algorithm. We also use high order time extensions applying the Adams-Bashforth time integration technique as well as the second order linear reconstruction in space. We numerically investigate the efficiency of the scheme through several test cases: Sod’s shock tube problem, Lax’s shock tube problem and the Shu-Osher test problem.

Keywords

Hyperbolic system Finite volume scheme Local mesh refinement Numerical density of entropy production Local time stepping 

MSC

74S10 35L60 74G15 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Allahviranloo T., Ahmady N., Ahmady E., Numerical solution of fuzzy differential equations by predictor-corrector method, Inform. Sci., 2007, 177(7), 1633–1647MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Altmann C., Belat T., Gutnic M., Helluy P., Mathis H., Sonnendrücker É., Angulo W., Hérard J.-M., A local timestepping discontinuous Galerkin algorithm for the MHD system, In: CEMRACS 2008 — Modelling and Numerical Simulation of Complex Fluids, Marseille, July 21–August 29, 2008, ESAIM Proc., 28, EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, 2009, 33–54Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Berger M.J., Oliger J., Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys., 1984, 53(3), 484–512MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Cockburn B., Gremaud P.-A., A priori error estimates for numerical methods for scalar conservation laws. Part II: Flux-splitting monotone schemes on irregular Cartesian grids, Math. Comp., 1997, 66(218), 547–572MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Croisille J.-P., Contribution à l’Étude Théorique et à l’Approximation par Éléments Finis du Système Hyperbolique de la Dynamique des Gaz Multidimensionnelle et Multiespèces, PhD thesis, Université de Paris VI, 1991Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Eymard R., Gallouët T., Herbin R., Finite Volume Methods, In: Handbook of Numerical Analysis, VII, Handb. Numer. Anal., VII, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000, 713–1020Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Gallouët T., Hérard J.-M., Seguin N., Some recent finite volume schemes to compute Euler equations using real gas EOS, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 2002, 39(12), 1073–1138MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Godlewski E., Raviart P.-A., Numerical Approximation of Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws, Appl. Math. Sci., 118, Springer, New York, 1996MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Golay F., Numerical entropy production and error indicator for compressible flows, Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2009, 337(4), 233–237MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Guermond J.-L., Pasquetti R., Popov B., Entropy viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 2011, 230(11), 4248–4267MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hairer E., Nørsett S.P., Wanner G., Solving Ordinary Differential Equations. I, 2nd ed., Springer Ser. Comput. Math., 8, Springer, Berlin, 1993MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Houston P., Mackenzie J.A., Süli E., Warnecke G., A posteriori error analysis for numerical approximations of Friedrichs systems, Numer. Math., 1999, 82(3), 433–470MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Jenny P., Lee S.H., Tchelepi H.A., Adaptive multiscale finite-volume method for multiphase flow and transport in porous media, Multiscale Model. Simul., 2005, 3(1), 50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Karni S., Kurganov A., Local error analysis for approximate solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws, Adv. Comput. Math., 2005, 22(1), 79–99MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Karni S., Kurganov A., Petrova G., A smoothness indicator for adaptive algorithms for hyperbolic systems, J. Comput. Phys., 2002, 178(2), 323–341MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Müller S., Stiriba Y., Fully adaptive multiscale schemes for conservation laws employing locally varying time stepping, J. Sci. Comput., 2007, 30(3), 493–531MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Osher S., Sanders R., Numerical approximations to nonlinear conservation laws with locally varying time and space grids, Math. Comp., 1983, 41(164), 321–336MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Puppo G., Numerical entropy production on shocks and smooth transitions, J. Sci. Comput., 2002, 17(1–4), 263–271MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Puppo G., Numerical entropy production for central schemes, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 2004, 25(4), 1382–1415MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Puppo G., Semplice M., Numerical entropy and adaptivity for finite volume schemes, Commun. Comput. Phys., 2011, 10(5), 1132–1160MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Shu C.-W., Osher S., Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 1988, 77(2), 439–471MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Simeoni C., Remarks on the consistency of upwind source at interface schemes on nonuniform grids, J. Sci. Comput., 2011, 48(1–3), 333–338MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Sod G.A., A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 1978, 27(1), 1–31MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Sonar T., Hannemann V., Hempel D. Dynamic adaptivity and residual control in unsteady compressible flow computation, In: Theory and Numerical Methods for Initial-Boundary Value Problems, Math. Comput. Modelling, 1994, 20(10–11), 201–213MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Tan Z., Zhang Z., Huang Y., Tang T., Moving mesh methods with locally varying time steps, J. Comput. Phys., 2004, 200(1), 347–367MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Tang H., Warnecke G., A class of high resolution difference schemes for nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi equations with varying time and space grids, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 2005, 26(4), 1415–1431MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Toro E.F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1999MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Zhang X.D., Trépanier J.-Y., Camarero R., A posteriori error estimation for finite-volume solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws, Comput. Methods Appl. Engrg., 2000, 185(1), 1–19MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Ersoy
    • 1
  • Frédéric Golay
    • 1
  • Lyudmyla Yushchenko
    • 1
  1. 1.IMATH, EA 2134Université de ToulonLa Garde CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations