A new quantitative approach to measure perceived work-related stress in Italian employees
- 108 Downloads
We propose a method for a reliable quantitative measure of subjectively perceived occupational stress applicable in any company to enhance occupational safety and psychosocial health, to enable precise prevention policies and intervention and to improve work quality and efficiency.
Materials and Methods
A suitable questionnaire was telephonically administered to a stratified sample of the whole Italian population of employees. Combined multivariate statistical methods, including principal component, cluster and discriminant analyses, were used to identify risk factors and to design a causal model for understanding work-related stress.
The model explained the causal links of stress through employee perception of imbalance between job demands and resources for responding appropriately, by supplying a reliable U-shaped nonlinear stress index, expressed in terms of values of human systolic arterial pressure. Low, intermediate and high values indicated demotivation (or inefficiency), well-being and distress, respectively. Costs for stress-dependent productivity shortcomings were estimated to about 3.7% of national income from employment.
The method identified useful structured information able to supply a simple and precise interpretation of employees’ well-being and stress risk. Results could be compared with estimated national benchmarks to enable targeted intervention strategies to protect the health and safety of workers, and to reduce unproductive costs for firms.
Key wordsMultivariate statistics Non productivity costs Occupational safety Prevention Risk assessment Work-related stress
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Selye H. The stress of life. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1976.Google Scholar
- 4.French JRP, Caplan RD, Van Harrison R. The mechanisms of job stress and strain. New York: Wiley; 1982.Google Scholar
- 6.Karasek RA, Theorell T. Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. (Appendix I). New York: Basic Books; 1990.Google Scholar
- 7.Cooper CL. Handbook of stress, medicine and health. New York: CRC Press; 1996.Google Scholar
- 8.Cox T, Griffiths A, Barlowe C, Randall R, Rial-Gonzalez E. Organizational interventions for work stress: A risk management approach. Sudbury, United Kingdom: HSE Books; 2000.Google Scholar
- 9.Maslach C, Leiter MP. Burnout and engagement in the workplace: A contextual analysis. In: Urdan TC, editor. Advances in Motivation and Achievement. United Kingdom: Stratford Books; 1999. p. 275–302.Google Scholar
- 10.Dewe P, Leiter MP, Cox T. Stress, coping, & health in organizations. London: Taylor & Francis; 2000.Google Scholar
- 15.Cox T, Griffiths A, Rial-González E. Research on Work-Related Stress. Report of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of The European Communities; 2000 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/203.
- 16.Parent-Thirion A, Fernández Macías E, Hurley J, Vermeylen G. Fourth European Working Conditions Survey. Report of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities; 2006 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/surveys/EWCS2005/index.htm.
- 17.Brun E, Milczarek M. Expert forecast on emerging psychosocial risks related to occupational health and safety. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. European Risk Observatory Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2007 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/7807118/view.Google Scholar
- 18.Milczarek M, Schneider E, Gonzalez ER. OSH in figures: stress at work - facts and figures. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. European Risk Observatory Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities; 2009 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/TE-81-08-478-EN-C_OSH_in_figures_stress_at_work.
- 19.Sahler B, Dubois A, Journoud S, Pelletier J. Work in Tune with Life: A guide to the business case for mental health. Essen: BKK Bundesverband / ENWHP Secretariat; 2009 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://www.enwhp.org/fileadmin/downloads/8th_Initiative/MentalHealth_Broschuere_businesscase.pdf.Google Scholar
- 20.Lelliott P, Tulloch S. Mental health and work. Report for the National Director for Work and Health. London: RCP; 2008 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://www.workingforhealth.gov.uk/documents/mental-health-and-work.pdf.Google Scholar
- 21.Cooper CL, Sloan SJ, Williams S. Occupational Stress Indicator. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson; 1988.Google Scholar
- 24.Murphy RL, Harrell JJ. Stress measurement and management in organizations: Development and current status. In: Riley A, Zaccaro S, editors. Occupational Stress and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Prager Press; 2004.Google Scholar
- 26.Barbini E, Cevenini G, Scolletta S, Biagioli B, Giomarelli P, Barbini P. A Comparative Analysis of Predictive Models of Morbidity in Intensive Care Unit after Cardiac Surgery — Part I: Model Planning. BMC Med Informat Dec Making 2007;7(35) [cited 2007 Nov 22]. Available from URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/7/35.
- 29.Hacker W. Objective work environment: analysis and evaluation of objective work characteristics. In: Levi L, Petters JL, editors. A Healthier Work Environment: Basic Concept and Methods of Measurement. Stockholm: Hogberga, Lidingo; 1991.Google Scholar
- 30.Avallone F, Bonaretti M. Organizational well-being. Rome: Rubbettino Editore, Soveria Mannelli; 2003 [in Italian].Google Scholar
- 31.Pelizzoni B. Administrations in search of organizational well-being. Rome: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane; 2005 [in Italian].Google Scholar
- 32.Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, Massachusets: Adison-Wesley; 1975.Google Scholar
- 33.Afifi AA, Clark V. Computer-aided multivariate analysis. 3rd ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1999.Google Scholar
- 35.Krzanowski WJ. Principles of Multivariate Analysis: A User’s Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1988.Google Scholar
- 38.Barbini P, Cevenini G. Design of scoring models for trustworthy risk prediction in critical patients. In: Śmigórski K, editor. Health Management - Different Approaches and Solutions. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Web Org; 2011:337–360.Google Scholar
- 42.Srivastava AK, Krishna A. A test of inverted “U”-hypothesis of stress/performance relationship in the industrial context. Psychol Stud 1991;36:34–38.Google Scholar
- 43.Koob GF. Arousal, stress, and inverted U-shaped curves: Implications for cognitive function. In: Lister RG, Weingartne HJ, editors. Perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 300–313.Google Scholar
- 44.European Commission. Eurostat, GDP 2007 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics.
- 45.Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). National economic account 2010 [cited 2011 Dec 15]. Available from URL: http://en.istat.it/dati/dataset/20110808_00.