Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasonographic findings of invasive lobular carcinoma differentiation of invasive lobular carcinoma from invasive ductal carcinoma by ultrasonography

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although controversy exists, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) differs in its high frequency of microscopically positive margins after conservative therapy compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). If ILC could be recognized by imaging modalities, it would provide important information for surgeons. We tried to confirm whether it is possible to distinguish ILC from other invasive carcinomas by ultrasonography (US).

Methods

A total of 81 histologically confirmed cases of IDC, including 26 cases of papillotubular carcinoma, 28 cases of solid-tubular carcinoma and 27 cases of scirrhous carcinoma, as well as 24 cases of ILC were selected and retrospectively studied with regard to the features of mass lesions on US examination.

Results

The sensitivities of US for papillotubular carcinoma, solid-tubular carcinoma, scirrhous carcinoma and ILC were 88.5%, 100%, 92.6% and 91.7% respectively. We could divide invasive breast cancer into two groups by US findings. One group had a low frequency of malignant findings and consisted of papillotubular and solid-tubular carcinomas, and the other group had a high frequency of malignant findings and consisted of scirrhous carcinomas and ILC. However, there were no statistical differences between papillotubular carcinoma and solid-tubular carcinoma or between scirrhous carcinoma and ILC with regard to the US findings.

Conclusions

Scirrhous carcinoma, the most common type of IDC, and ILC are difficult to distinguish by US. Therefore it is difficult to separate ILC from IDC by US.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sakamoto G, Sugano H, Hukami A, Kuno K: Nyusen no shouyougan.Jpn J Cancer Clin 22:449–456,1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Izuo M: Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the breast -on the distinctive nature of the disease and the current problems-.Jpn J Breast Cancer 11:279–288, 1996. (in Japanese with English abstruct)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka T, Morimoto T, Komaki M, Yamakawa S, Mitsuyama N, Ohshita K, Ohmine Y, Konishi Y, Kadota Y: Nyusenshouyougan no rinshouteki kentou.Jpn J Cancer Clin 33:1309–1313,1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogawa H, Ogita M, Ikuta K, Andou N, Kawamata T, Fujita M, Yamashiro K, Uchino J: A clinicopathological study of lobular carcinoma of the breast.J Jpn Surg Assoc 54:1712–1715,1993. (in Jananese with English abstruct)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li Fu, Tsuchiya S, Matsuyama I, Ishii K: Clinicopathologic features and incidence of invasive lobular carcinoma in Japanese women.Pathology International 48:343–354,1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lesser ML, Rosen PP, Kinne DW: Multicentricity and bilaterality in invasive breast carcinoma.Surgery 91:234–240,1982.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horn PL, Thompson WD: Risk of contralateral breast cancer: associations with factors related to initial breast cancer.Am J Epidemiol 128:309–323,1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poen JC, Tran L, Juillard G, Selch MT, Giuliano A, Silverstein M, Fingerhut A, Lewinsky B, Parker RG: Conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Cancer 69:2789–2795,1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bouvet M, Ollila DW, Hunt KK, Babiera GV, Spitz FR, Giuliano AE, Strom EA, Ames FC, Ross MI, Singletary SE: Role of conservation therapy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Ann Surg Oncol 4:650–654,1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Warneke J, Berger R, Johnson C, Stea D, Villar H: Lumpectomy and radiation treatment for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Am J Surg 172:496–500, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung MA, Cole B, Wanebo HJ, Bland KI, Chang HR: Optimal surgical treatment of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Ann Surg Oncol 4:545–550, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeatman TJ, Cantor AB, Smith TJ, Smith SK, Reintgen DS, Miller MS, Ku NN, Baekey PA, Cox CE: Tumor biology of infiltrating lobular carcinoma. Implications for management.Ann Surg 222:549–561, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hussien M, Lioe TF, Finnegan J, Spence RA: Surgical treatment for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.Breast 12:23–35, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hiba M, Kaise H, Nakayama S, Kohmoto A, Numajiri K, Koyanagi Y: Kouseinouchouonpakiki wo mochiita chouonpasindansi to nyusensenmoni niyoru nyugan sosikigata sindan.J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Screen 9:373, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tsunoda H: The ultrasonographic findings of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.Jpn J Med Ultrasonics 23:suppl-1:72,1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Japan association of breast and thyroid sonology QABTS), Guideline for Breast Ultrasound - Management and Diagnosis, Nankodo pp25-60. 2004.

  17. Chintana P. Paramagul, Mark A. Helvie, Dorit D. Adler: Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic appearance and role of sonography in improving diagnostic sensitivity.Radiology 195:231–234,1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rissanen T, Tikkakoski T, Autio AL, Apaja-Sarkkinen M: Ultrasonography of invasive lobular breast carcinoma.Acta Radiol 39:285–291,1998.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Butler RS, Venta LA, Wiley EL, Ellis RL, Dempsey PJ, Rubin E: Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma.AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:325–330,1999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Skaane P, Skjorten F: Ultrasonographic evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma.Acta Radiol 40:369–375, 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chapellier C, Balu-Maestro C, Bleuse A, Ettore F, Bruneton JN: Ultrasonography of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: sonographic patterns and diagnostic value: report of 102 cases.Clin Imaging 24:333- 336, 2000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. KS. Pointon, D.A. Cunningham: Ultrasound findings in pure invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: comparison with matched cases of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.The Breast 8:188–190,1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito K, Shinyama N, Ikeda Y, Sakai S, Ono M, Toyoshima S, Mitsuyama M: Ultrasonographic findings of invasive lobular carcinoma of the mammary gland in comparison with histopathological images.J Jpn Assoc Breast Cancer Scren 8:231–237,1999. (in Jananese with English abstruct)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.Radiology 196:123–134,1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Skaane P, Engedal K: Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.Am J Roentgenol 170:109–114, 1998.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsujimoto F: Atlas of breast ultrasound, Bector Core, PP64–65,1980.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Ohta, T., Tsujimoto, F., Nakajima, Y. et al. Ultrasonographic findings of invasive lobular carcinoma differentiation of invasive lobular carcinoma from invasive ductal carcinoma by ultrasonography. Breast Cancer 12, 304–311 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.304

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.304

Keywords

Navigation