Abstract
Background
It has been reported that immediate autologous tissue breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is esthetically superior to autologous tissue reconstruction after conventional mastectomy (CM). We evaluated reconstructed breasts to determine whether these methods contribute to breast appearance other than skin texture.
Methods
Between April 1992 and September 2001, forty-two patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction using autologous tissue. Mastectomy options were NSM, SSM and CM. Postoperative photographs were evaluated using a subscale (volume, contour, placement, and inframammary fold) on a 0-2 point scale. Sternal notch to nipple distances of the affected and normal sides were measured with photographs to estimate nipple-areola complex (NAC) position. No corrective procedure was performed in a later phase before evaluation.
Results
NSM was performed in 22, SSM in 6 and CM in 14 cases. On esthetic evaluation, the NSM and SSM groups received 4.96 and the CM group received 4.63. There were no significant differences. In the NSM and SSM group, the NAC position rose in cases with partial necrosis or fat lysis compared with the no complication group (p = 0,004).
Conclusions
Autologous tissue breast reconstruction after NSM or SSM is esthetically equal to autologous tissue reconstruction after CM with regard to parameters other than skin texture. Preserved or simultaneously reconstructed NAC sometimes emphasizes nipple-areola asymmetry when breast deformity has occurred.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garbay JR, Rietjens M, Petit JY: Esthetic results of breast reconstruction after amputation for cancer. 323 cases. Journal de Gynecologie, Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 21:405–412, 1992. (In French with English abstract)
Carlson GW, Losken A, Moore B,et al: Results of Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.Ann Plast Surg 46:222–228, 2001.
Freeman BS: Subcutaneous mastectomy for benign breast lesions with immediate or delayed prosthetic replacement.Plast Reconstr Surg 30:676, 1962.
Freeman BS, Wiemer DR: Total glandular mastectomy: Modification of the subcutaneous mastectomy for use in premalignant disease of the breast.Plast Reconstr Surg 62:167, 1978.
Hinton CP, Doyle PJ, Blarney RW, Davies CJ, Holliday HW, Elston CW: Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary operable breast cancer.Br J Surgery 71:469- 472, 1984.
Verheyden CN: Nipple-sparing total mastectomy of large breasts: the role of tissue expansion.Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1494–1500, 1998.
Proano E, Perbeck LG: Influence of the site of skin incision on the circulation in the nipple-areola complex after subcutaneous mastectomy in breast cancer.Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg & Hand Surg 30:195–200, 1996.
Nakajima H, Imanishi N, Aiso S: Arterial anatomy of the nipple-areola complex.Plast Reconstr Surg 96:843- 845, 1995.
Hidalgo DA: Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer.Plast Reconstr Surg 102:63- 70, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Mori, H., Umeda, T., Osanai, T. et al. Esthetic evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy. Breast Cancer 12, 299–303 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.299
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.299