Abstract
Background
Ultrasound (US) is a standard modality to diagnose breast diseases. To elucidate the usefulness of US in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancers, we reviewed the cases that were treated at our institution.
Methods
Of the 106 cancers that were operated upon at the Tsukuba University Hospital between February 2004 and March 2005, 12 cancers were nonpalpable. We reviewed their US findings, results of US-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), core biopsy results, and histological diagnoses.
Results
On US, 9 tumors appeared as masses. The US observations were valuable, but a confirmato- ry diagnosis could not be made. US-guided FNAC was performed in 8 cases; malignancy was suspected in 6 cases. US-guided core biopsy was performed in 9 cases, and it was diagnostic in 7 cases.
Conclusions
Nonpalpable breast cancers can be effectively detected by US, and the diagnosis can be confirmed by US-guided FNAC or core biopsy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cox BA, Kelly KM, Ko P, Hertzog L, Stain SC: Ultrasound characteristics of breast carcinoma.Am Surg 63:934–938, 1998.
Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW: Screening for breast cancer.JAMA 9;293: 1245–1256, 2005.
Mendelson EB: Problem-solving ultrasound.Radiol Clin North Am 42:909–918, 2004.
Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Dunser M: Clinically and Mammographically eccult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography.Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21:325–336, 2000.
Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, Berliere M, Berg BV, D’Hoore W, Maldague B: Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density.Am J Roentgenol 180:1675–1679, 2003.
Berg WA: Supplemental screening sonography in dense breast.Radiol Clin North Am 42:845–851, 2004.
Fornage BD, Sneige N, Edeiken BS: Interventional Breast Sonography.European J of Radiol 42:17–31, 2002.
Ciatto S, Rosselli Del, Turco M, Ambrogettei D, Catarzi S, b Morrone D, Cariaggi MP: Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fineneedle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.Acta Radiol 38:815–820, 1997.
Thibault F, Meunier M, Klijanienko J, El Khoury C, Nos C, Vincent-Salomon A, Asselain B, Neuenschwander S: Diagnostic Accuracy of sonography and combined sonographic assessment and sonographically guided cytology in nonpalpable solid breast lesions.J Clin Ultrasound 28:387–398, 2000.
Zanconati FB, Bonifacio D, Falconieri G, Di Bonito L: Role of fine-needle cytology in nonpalpable mammary lesions: a comparative cytohistologic study based on 308 cases.Diagn Cytopathol 23:87–91, 2000.
Pijinappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, Mali WP, Peterse JL, Hendrisk JH, Peeters PH: Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions.Br J Cancer 9;90:595–600, 2004.
LATrenta LR, Menell LH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Gershaw DD, Libeman L: Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US.Radiology 227:856–861, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Tohno, E., Ueno, E. Ultrasound (US) diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer. Breast Cancer 12, 267–271 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.267
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.12.267