The reversed apical pattern of MUC1 expression is characteristics of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast
- 73 Downloads
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is a special subtype of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), which is known to have a high potential to metastasize to the axillary lymph node. However, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate IMPC from conventional IDC showing an IMPC-like pattern due to artifact (pseudo-IMPC). In the present study, we investigated the usefulness of immunohistochemical expression of MUC1 for distinguishing IMPC from pseudo-IMPC, and analyzed several clinicopathological parameters of IMPC and pseudo-IMPC cases.
Eighty cases showing IMPC or IMPC-like pattern were selected from our surgical files of 1240 cases of IDC. We examined the expression of MUC1, D2-40 and CD34 by immunohistochemistry.
Eighty cases were classified into 9 cases (0.7%) of pure-IMPC, 31 cases (2.5%) of mixed-IMPC, and 40 cases of pseudo-IMPC, according to the expression pattern of MUC1. In pure-IMPC cases, MUC1 expression was found at the reversed apical membrane of neoplastic cell clusters, while in pseudo-IMPC, MUC1 expression was present in the whole cytoplasmic membrane and/or cytoplasm. There were no significant differences among the three groups in patient age, tumor size and nuclear grade of neoplastic cells. However, lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis in the pure-IMPC or mixed-IMPC cases were higher than those in pseudo-IMPC cases with statistically significant values. Pure-IMPC has a higher recurrence rate and lower overall survival compared to pseudo-IMPC [P=0.0165(DFS)P=0.025(OS) ].
This study demonstrated that immunohistochemistry of MUC1 is useful for the diagnosis of IMPC. The pure-IMPC cases had higher incidences of lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis, and also showed a poorer prognosis.
Key wordsInvasive micropapillary carcinoma Lymphatic invasion MUC1 D2-40
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 12).Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Ciris M, Bayramoglu H, Ozdemir N: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.Histopathology 44:18–23, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13).Tsumagari K, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Kasumi F: The pathological diagnosis and clinical significance of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Jpn J Breast Cancer 16:441–446, 2001 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
- 14).Tsumagari K, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Kasumi F: The cinicaopathological study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Jpn J Breast Cancer 16:341–348, 2001 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
- 20).Hayes DF, Mesa-Tejada R, Papsidero LD, Croghan GA, Korzun AH, Norton L, Wood W, Strauchen JA, Grimes M, Weiss RB, Ree HJ, Thor AD, Koerner FC, Rice MA, Barcos M, Kufe D: Prediction of prognosis in primary breast cancer by detection of a high molecular weight mucin-like antigen using monoclonal antibodies DF3, F36/22, and CU18: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.J Clin Oncol 9:1113–1123, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar