Breast Cancer

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 58–63 | Cite as

The reversed apical pattern of MUC1 expression is characteristics of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast

  • Yu-sang Li
  • Mayumi Kaneko
  • Danielle Giacometti Sakamoto
  • Yukio Takeshima
  • Kouki Inai
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is a special subtype of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), which is known to have a high potential to metastasize to the axillary lymph node. However, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate IMPC from conventional IDC showing an IMPC-like pattern due to artifact (pseudo-IMPC). In the present study, we investigated the usefulness of immunohistochemical expression of MUC1 for distinguishing IMPC from pseudo-IMPC, and analyzed several clinicopathological parameters of IMPC and pseudo-IMPC cases.

Methods

Eighty cases showing IMPC or IMPC-like pattern were selected from our surgical files of 1240 cases of IDC. We examined the expression of MUC1, D2-40 and CD34 by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Eighty cases were classified into 9 cases (0.7%) of pure-IMPC, 31 cases (2.5%) of mixed-IMPC, and 40 cases of pseudo-IMPC, according to the expression pattern of MUC1. In pure-IMPC cases, MUC1 expression was found at the reversed apical membrane of neoplastic cell clusters, while in pseudo-IMPC, MUC1 expression was present in the whole cytoplasmic membrane and/or cytoplasm. There were no significant differences among the three groups in patient age, tumor size and nuclear grade of neoplastic cells. However, lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis in the pure-IMPC or mixed-IMPC cases were higher than those in pseudo-IMPC cases with statistically significant values. Pure-IMPC has a higher recurrence rate and lower overall survival compared to pseudo-IMPC [P=0.0165(DFS)P=0.025(OS) ].

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that immunohistochemistry of MUC1 is useful for the diagnosis of IMPC. The pure-IMPC cases had higher incidences of lymphatic invasion and lymph node metastasis, and also showed a poorer prognosis.

Key words

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma Lymphatic invasion MUC1 D2-40 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Siriaunkgul S, Tavassoli FA: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Mod Pathol 6:660–662, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    Luna-More S, Gonzalez B, Acedo C, Rodrigo I, Luna C: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. A new special type of invasive mammary carcinoma.Pathol Res Pract 190:668–674, 1994.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3).
    Amin MB, Ro JY, el-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG, Ordonez NG, Ayala AG: Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma.Am J Surg Pathol 18:1224–1232, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4).
    Seidman JD, Kurman RJ: Subclassification of serous borderline tumors of the ovary into benign and malignant types. A clinicopathologic study of 65 advanced stage cases.Am J Surg Pathol 20:1331–1345, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5).
    Prat J, De Nictolis M: Serous borderline tumors of the ovary: a long-term follow-up study of 137 cases, including 18 with a micropapillary pattern and 20 with microinvasion.Am J Surg Pathol 26:1111–1128, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    Amin MB, Tamboli P, Merchant SH, Ordonez NG, Ro J, Ayala AG, Ro JY: Micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma: a distinctive histologic feature with possible prognostic significance.Am J Surg Pathol 26:358–364, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    Nagao T, Gaffey TA, Visscher DW, Kay PA, Minato H, Serizawa H, Lewis JE: Invasive micropapillary salivary duct carcinoma: a distinct histologic variant with biologic significance.Am J Surg Pathol 28:319–326, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Nassar H, Wallis T, Andea A, Dey J, Adsay V, Visscher D: Clinicopathologic analysis of invasive micropapillary differentiation in breast carcinoma.Mod Pathol 14:836–841, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Walsh MM, Bleiweiss IJ: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: eighty cases of an underrecognized entity.Hum Pathol 32:583–589, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10).
    Nassar H, Pansare V, Zhang H, Che M, Sakr W, AliFehmi R, Grignon D, Sarkar F, Cheng J, Adsay V: Pathogenesis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma: role of MUC1 glycoprotein.Mod Pathol 17:1045–1050, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11).
    Pettinato G, Manivel CJ, Panico L, Sparano L, Petrella G: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathologic study of 62 cases of a poorly recognized variant with highly aggressive behavior.Am J Clin Pathol 121:857–866, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Ciris M, Bayramoglu H, Ozdemir N: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma.Histopathology 44:18–23, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13).
    Tsumagari K, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Kasumi F: The pathological diagnosis and clinical significance of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Jpn J Breast Cancer 16:441–446, 2001 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    Tsumagari K, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Kasumi F: The cinicaopathological study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast.Jpn J Breast Cancer 16:341–348, 2001 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    Patton S, Gendler SJ, Spicer AP: The epithelial mucin, MUC1, of milk, mammary gland and other tissues.Biochim Biophys Acta 1241:407–423, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16).
    Li Y, Bharti A, Chen D, Gong J, Kufe D: Interaction of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta with the DF3/MUC1 carcinoma-associated antigen and beta-catenin.Mol Cell Biol 18:7216–7224, 1998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17).
    Rahn JJ, Dabbagh L, Pasdar M, Hugh JC: Importance of MUC1 cellular localization in patients with breast carcinoma: an immunohistologic study of 71 patients andreview of the literature.Cancer 91:1973–1982, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18).
    Muir IM, Reed RG, Stacker SA, Alexander AI, Mckenzie IF, Bennett RG: The prognosis value of immunoperoxidase staining with monoantibodies NCRC-11 and 3E1.2 in breast cancer.Br J Cancer 64:124–127, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19).
    McGuckin MA, Walsh MD, Hohn BG, Ward BG, Wright RG: Prognostic significance of MUC1 epithelial mucin expression in breast cancer.Hum Pathol 26:432–439, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20).
    Hayes DF, Mesa-Tejada R, Papsidero LD, Croghan GA, Korzun AH, Norton L, Wood W, Strauchen JA, Grimes M, Weiss RB, Ree HJ, Thor AD, Koerner FC, Rice MA, Barcos M, Kufe D: Prediction of prognosis in primary breast cancer by detection of a high molecular weight mucin-like antigen using monoclonal antibodies DF3, F36/22, and CU18: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.J Clin Oncol 9:1113–1123, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21).
    Paterakos M, Watkin WG, Edgerton SM, Moore DH 2nd, Thor AD: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a prognostic study.Hum Pathol 30:1459–1463, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22).
    Kahn HJ, Bailey D, Markks A: Monoclonal antibody D2-40, a new marker of lymphatic endothelium, reacts with Kaposi’s sarcoma and a subset of angiosarcomas.Mod Pathol 15:434–440, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23).
    Kahn HJ, Marks A: A new monoclonal antibody, D2-40, for detection of lymphatic invasion in primary tumors.Lab Invest 82:1255–1257, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24).
    Hinkens J, Vos HL, Wesseling J, Boer M, Storm J, van der Valk S, Calafat J, Patriarca C: Is episialin/MUC1 involved in breast cancer progression?Cancer Lett 90:27–33, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25).
    Wesseling J, van der Valk SW, Hinkens J: A mechanism for inhibition of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion by the membrane-associated mucin episialin/MUC1.MOL Biol Cell 7:565–577, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26).
    Luna-More S, de los Santos F, Breton JJ, Canadas MA: Estrogen and Progesterone receptors, c-erbB-2, P53, and bcl-2 in thirty-three invasive micropapillary Breast carcinomas.Pathol Res Pract 192:27–31, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu-sang Li
    • 1
  • Mayumi Kaneko
    • 1
  • Danielle Giacometti Sakamoto
    • 1
  • Yukio Takeshima
    • 1
  • Kouki Inai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PathologyGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations