Abstract
Jobs for All at decent wages is not the only strategy for reducing poverty and economic inequality, but it is more desirable and more consonant with American values than a primary strategy of direct income redistribution through government benefits. To make jobs the primary strategy for people of working age, however, is not to overlook the need for certain types of income support in good times and in bad, and the important economic functions of the welfare state. Current welfare “reform” poses as a work strategy but is the very antithesis of jobs for all because it creates job seekers rather than jobs and will increase unemployment and lower wages. Economic and social benefits of full employment are identified, and criticisms of the strategy—that many current jobs are risky, boring and poorly paid—are addressed. The abiding and new obstacles to full employment are acknowledged, their seriousness assessed, and means for overcoming them proposed. The author concludes that the obstacles to jobs for all are primarily political rather than economic, and shows how the National Jobs for All Coalition is attempting to overcome them and to build a new movement for economic justice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goldberg, G. Jobs for All, Economic Justice, and the Challenge of Welfare “Reform”. J Public Health Pol 18, 302–324 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3343312
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3343312