Skip to main content
Log in

Public Health Privatization: Proponents, Resisters, and Decision-Makers

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Public Health Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We previously documented the extent and consequences of the privatization of public health, using a nationally representative sample of 347 Local Health Department (LHD) directors. Here we present the directors' descriptions of the actors involved in the privatization of services. LHD top administrators are the most influential privatization decision-makers in about half of LHDs. But other groups significantly influence privatization decisions, particularly state governments, state health departments, and local officials. Nearly two thirds of LHDs experienced pressures to privatize, either from state legislatures, state health departments, funding organizations, or other source of political pressure. Almost half of LHD directors reported resistance to privatization, often from employees. The majority of directors did not believe it was desirable to put employees on a temporary, contractual basis. Many directors believed that retaining permanent, full-time employees was fairer as well as necessary to maintain a cadre of experienced public health professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keane, C., Marx, J. & Ricci, E. Public Health Privatization: Proponents, Resisters, and Decision-Makers. J Public Health Pol 23, 133–152 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/3343191

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3343191

Navigation