Skip to main content
Log in

Three strikes and you're out: Demographic analysis of mandatory prison sentencing

  • Demography and Prison Sentencing Policy
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Much of the debate about the costs and benefits of “three-strikes” laws for repeat felony offenders is implicitly demographic, relying on unexamined assumptions about prison population dynamics. However, even state-of-the-art analysis has omitted important demographic details. We construct a multistate life-table model of population flows to and from prisons, incorporating age-specific transition rates estimated from administrative data from Florida. We use the multistate life-table model to investigate patterns of prison population growth and aging under many variants of three-strikes laws. Our analysis allows us to quantify these demographic changes and suggests that the aging of prison populations under three-strikes policies will Significantly undermine their long-run effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bales, WD. and L.G. Dees. 1992. “Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in Florida: Past Trends and Future Implications.” Crime and Delinquency 38:309–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, F.C., A.H. Wade, and S.C. Goss. 1992. Life Tables for the United States Social Security Area. Actuarial Study No. 107, Social Security Administration Pub. No. 11-11536.

  • Blumstein, A., J. Cohen, and H.D. Miller. 1981. “Demographically Disaggregated Projections of Prison Populations.” Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management 1:3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., J. Cohen, J.A. Roth, and C.A. Visher, eds. 1986. Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, Vols. 1–2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canela-Cacho, J.A., A. Blumstein, and J. Cohen. 1997. “Relationship Between the Offending Frequency (1) of Imprisoned and Free Offenders.” Criminology 35:133–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, WS. 1979. “Robust Locally-Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:829–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., T. Little, and C. Coggin. 1996. “A Meta-Analysis of the Predictors of Adult Offender Recidivism: What Works!” Criminology 34:575–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P.W., C.P. Rydell, A.F. Abrahamse, J.P. Caulkins, J. Chiesa, K.E. Model, and S.P. Klein. 1994. Three Strikes and You're Out: Estimated Benefits and Costs of California's New Mandatory Sentencing Law. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T.J. and R.I. Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. and M. Gottfredson. 1983. “Age and the Explanation of Crime.” American Journal of Sociology 89:552–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, N.M. 1992. “A View of the Future: The Effect of Policy on Prison Population Growth.” Crime and Delinquency 38:357–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. 1985. Applied Mathematical Demography, 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K.C., P.L. McCall, and D.S. Nagin. 1996. “A Comparison of Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Semiparametric Mixed Poisson Regression Models, With Empirical Applications to Criminal Careers Data.” Sociological Methods and Research 24:387–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P.A. 1991. “America's Soaring Prison Population.” Science 251:1568–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D.S. and K.C. Land. 1993. “Age, Criminal Careers, and Population Heterogeneity: Specification and Estimation of a Nonparametric, Mixed Poisson Model.” Criminology 31:327–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics. 1994. Vital Statistics of the United States 1990, Vol. II, Section 6: Life Tables. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Publication Number PHS 94-1104.

  • Petersilia, J. and P.W Greenwood. 1978. “Mandatory Prison Sentences: Their Projected Effects on Crime and Prison Populations.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69:604–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A. 1975. Introduction to Multiregional Mathematical Demography. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann, C.P., A. Amankwaa, and R.D. Long. 1995. “Three Strikes and You're Out: Demographic Analysis of Mandatory Prison Sentencing.” Working Paper #95-129, Center for the Study of Population, Florida State University.

  • Schoen, R. 1988. Modeling Multigroup Populations. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Sentencing Commission. 1991. Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C.A. 1986. “The Rand Inmate Survey: A Reanalysis.” In Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, Vol. 2, edited by A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J.A. Roth, and C.A. Visher. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D.A. 1988. “The Multistate Life Table With Duration-Dependence.” Mathematical Population Studies 1:217–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl P. Schmertmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmertmann, C.P., Amankwaa, A.A. & Long, R.D. Three strikes and you're out: Demographic analysis of mandatory prison sentencing. Demography 35, 445–463 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/3004013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3004013

Keywords

Navigation