Skip to main content
Log in

A revision of Helietta and Balfourodendron (Rutaceae-Pteleinae)

  • Articles
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A taxonomic revision of two of the four genera in the rutaceous subtribe Pteleinae is presented.Helietta andBalfourodendron are neotropical taxa that share trifoliolate leaves, terminal thyrses, small isostemonous flowers, syncarpous 4–5-carpellate ovaries, winged fruits, and seeds with endosperm. They differ mainly in thatBalfourodendron has leaf domatia and a samara with broad verticillate wings, whileHelietta lacks domatia and has a fruit that separates into free samaroid mericarps, each with a dorsal wing. Two species are recognized inBalfourodendron, B. riedelianum andB. molle, the latter being a new combination.Helietta comprises 8 species, including a new combination,H. glaziovii. Keys to the species, descriptions, synonyms illustrations, and comments on the geographic distribution and ecology of each taxon are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baillon, H. E. 1871. De genere novoPicrella. Adansonia 10: 149–151, t. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, N. L. 1908. North American trees. Henry Holt Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, F. 1984. A new species ofHelietta (Rutaceae) from Guerrero and Jalisco, Mexico; a synopsis of the North American species. Brittonia 36: 455–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrêa, M. P. 1926. Dicionário das plantas úteis do Brasil e das exóticas cultivadas. Vol. 1. Imprensa Nacional, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R. S. &L. B. Smith. 1973. Rutáceas. Pages 1–89.In: R. Reitz, editor. Flora Ilustrada Catarinense. Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, Itajaí.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. A. (editor). 1991. Index Kewensis. Suppl. 16. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A. 1896. Rutaceae. Pages 95–201.In: A. Engler & K. Prantl, editors. Natur. Pflanzenfam., T. 3, Ab. 4.

  • Engler, A. 1931. Rutaceae. Simaroubaceae. Pages 187–359, 359–405.In: A. Engler & K. Prantl, editors. Natur. Pflanzenfam., ed. 2, 19a.

  • Espinal T. L. S. 1990. Zonas de vida de Colombia. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellín.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewel, J. J. &A. Madriz. 1968. Zonas de vida de Venezuela. Editorial Sucre, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A. H. 1982. Neotropical floristic diversity: phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny? Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 69: 557–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1993. A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru). Conservation International, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1897. Rutaceae. Pages 369–376.In: A. Gray, editor. Synoptical Flora of North America 1(2). American Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, L. J. 1979. A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Pages 25–39.In: C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk, editors. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Vol. 1. Ed. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaastra, R. C. 1977. New taxa and new combinations in Rutaceae. Acta Bot. Néerl. 26: 471–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. Pilocarpinae (Rutaceae). Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 33: 1–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • León, H. &H. Alain. 1951. Flora de Cuba. Vol. 2. P. Hernandez & Cia., La Habana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi, H. 1992. árvores brasileiras. Editora Plantarum, Nova Odessa, Brasil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, E. J. 1993. Annotated checklist of the vascular flora of the Chamela Bay Region, Jalisco, Mexico. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 148: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainieri, C. &M. V. Steigleder. 1968. Contribuição ao estudo anatômico do lenho da canela de veado (Helietta cuspidata Engl.). Bol. Inst. Tecnol. Rio Grande do Sul 44: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, M. 1937. Catalogo de nombres vulgares y científicos de plantas mexicanas. Imprenta Mexicana, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesman, M. W. 1962. Meet Flora Mexicana. D. S. King, Globe, Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, G. C. P. & H. P. Bautista. 1990. Cobertura vegetal da Serra da Itiúba, Bahia. Pages 244–255. Anais do XXXV Congresso Nacional de Botânica, Manaus.

  • Pittier, H., T. Lasser, L. Schnee, Z. Luces de Febres &V. Badillo. 1947. Catalogo de la Flora Venezolana. Litografía y Tipografía Vargas, Caracas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prado, D. E. &P. E. Gibbs. 1993. Patterns of species distributions in the dry seasonal forests of South America. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 902–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T. (editor). 1982. Biological diversification in the tropics. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., W. C. Dickinson, J. R. Massey &C. R. Bell. 1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Record, S. J. &R. W. Hess. 1940. American woods of the family Rutaceae. Trop. Woods 64: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski, J. 1981. Vegetación de México. Editorial Limusa, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, C. S. 1905. Manual of the trees of North America. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnee, L. 1960. Plantas comunes de Venezuela. Revista Fac. Agron. Univ. Central Venezuela 3: 1–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, H. 1964. Reihe Rutales. Pages 262–277.In: H. Melchior, editor. A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 12. Vol. 2. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, M. F. F., O. R. Gottlieb &F. Ehrendorfer. 1988. Chemosystematics of the Rutaceae: suggestions for a more natural taxonomy and evolutionary interpretation of the family. Pl. Syst. Evol. 161: 97–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, B. J. 1988. A field guide to Texas trees. Texas Monthly Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. K. 1911. Simaroubaceae. North American Flora 25(3): 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spichiger, R. &L. Stutz de Ortega. 1987. Flora del Paraguay. Rutaceae. Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques de Genève, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spjut, R. W. 1994. A systematic treatment of fruit types. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 70: 1–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P. C. 1923. Trees and shrubs of Mexico (Oxalidaceae-Turneraceae). Contr. U.S. Nat. Herb. 23(3): 517–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toursarkissian, M. 1957. El nombre correcto de la espécie deHelietta (Rutaceae) del nordeste Argentino. Bol. Soc. Argentina Bot. 7(1): 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tröll, W. 1969. Die Infloreszenzen. Vol. 2. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulasne, L. R. 1847. Plantes nouvelles de la Colombie. Ann. Sci. Nat. sér. 3, 7: 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C. &G. T. Prance, editors 1989. Biogeography and Quaternary history in tropical Latin America. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pirani, J.R. A revision of Helietta and Balfourodendron (Rutaceae-Pteleinae). Brittonia 50, 348–380 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/2807779

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2807779

Key words

Navigation