Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Revision of the cerrado hemicryptophytic Chamaesyce of Boissier's “Pleiadeniae” (Euphorbiaceae)

Brittonia volume 49, pages 155–180 (1997)Cite this article

Abstract

The species ofChamaesyce classified by Boissier as the “Pleiadeniae” are revised in light of presently available collections. Six species are accepted and new combinations are proposed forC. nana, C. setosa, C. tamanduana, andC. viscoides. Although these herbaceous perennials of cerrado vegetation of Brazil, northern Argentina, and adjacent countries are distinctive ecologically and geographically, cladistic analysis does not support their recognition as a monophyletic group.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Literature Cited

  • Adams, E. N. 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic terms. Syst. Zool. 21: 390–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allem, A. C. 1977. Notas sistemáticas y nuevos sinónimos en Euphorbiaceae de América del Sur—V. Revista Brasil. Biol. 37: 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allem, A. C. &B. E. Irgang. 1975. Flora illustrada do Rio Grande do Sul: Euphorbiaceae Tribo Euphorbieae. Bol. Inst. Cent. Biociências, Sér. Bot. 4, 34: 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedí, C. &J. J. Orell. 1992. Taxonomy of the genusChamaesyce S. F. Gray (Euphorbiaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 21: 9–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissier, E. 1860. Centuria Euphorbiarum. Pages 1–40. Paris.

  • Boissier, E. 1862. Subordo Euphorbieae.In: De Candolle, Prodromus 15(2): 3–188. Paris.

  • Boissier, E. 1866. Icones Euphorbiarum. 1–24., 1–120 fig., Paris.

  • Bremer, K. 1990. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics 6: 369–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chodat, R. 1901. Plantae Hasslerianae soit énumération des plantes récoltées au Paraguay par le Dr. Émile Hassler, d'Aarau (Suisse) de 1885–1895 et de 1898–1900. Euphorbiaceae. Bull. Herb. Boissier, sér. 2, 1: 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodat, R. & E. Hassler. 1905.Euphorbia. In: Plantae Hasslerianae. Bull. Herb. Boissier, sér. 2, 5: 613–616.

  • Croizat, L. 1943. Novelties in American Euphorbiaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 24: 165–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrich, K. 1937. Uma novaEuphorbia dos campos do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Sudamer. Bot. 4: 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 18: 374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. 1988. Hennig86 version 1.5. Computer program and documentation. Distributed by the author.

  • Farris, J. 1991. Eve version 1.1. Computer program. Distributed by the author.

  • Goloboff, P. A. 1993a. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9: 38–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff, P. A. 1993b. Pee-Wee version 2.1. Computer software and documentation. Distributed by the author.

  • Haber, J. M. 1925. The anatomy and morphology of the flower ofEuphorbia. Ann. Bot. 39: 657–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, W. J. 1988. Ontogeny of the cotyledonary region ofChamaesyce maculata (Euphorbiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 75: 1701–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huft, M. J. 1979. A monograph ofEuphorbia sectionTithymalopsis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.

  • Hurusawa, I. 1954. Eine nochmalige Durchsicht des herkömlichen Systems der Euphorbiaceen im weiteren Sinne. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 6: 209–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, M. S. &W. J. Hayden. 1992. A survey of mucilaginous testa inChamaesyce. Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 21: 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotzsch, F. 1859. Linnés natürliche Pflanzenklasse Tricoccae. Abh. K. Akad. Wiss. Berlin. 1: 1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutnik, D. L. 1984.Chamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae)—a newly recognized genus in southern Africa. South African J. Bot. 3: 262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutnik, D. L. 1987. A taxonomic revision of the Hawaiian species of the genusChamaesyce (Euphorbiaceae). Allertonia 4(6): 331–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S., S. Chaw, &C. Hsieh. 1991. A taxonomic study of the genusChamaesyce S. F. Gray (Euphorbiaceae) in Taiwan. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 32: 215–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, C. &M. J. Diez. 1985. Contribución al atlas palinológico de Andalucía occidental, III Euphorbiaceae. Lagascalia 13: 275–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (Mueller Argoviensis). 1874. Euphorbiaceae.In: C. F. P. Martius. Flora Brasiliensis 11(2): 293–750. Munich.

  • Nixon, K. C. 1993. ClaDOS version 1.4. Computer program and documentation. Distributed by the author.

  • Nixon, K. C. &Q. D. Wheeler. 1990. Extinction and the origin of species. Pages 119–143.In: M. J. Novak & Q. D. Wheeler (editors). Extinction and phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punt, W. 1962. Pollen morphology of the Euphorbiaceae with special reference to taxonomy. Wentia 7: 1–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambo, B. 1960. Euphorbiaceae Riograndenses. Pesquisas 9: 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoute, J. C. 1937. On the aestivation in the cyathium ofEuphorbia fulgens, with some general remarks on the morphological interpretation of the cyathium in general. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neérl. 34: 168–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. &F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Taxonomic congruence in the Leptopodomorpha re-examined. Syst. Zool. 30: 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subils, R. 1977. Las especies deEuphorbia de la República Argentina. Kurtziana 10: 83–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L. 1967. The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 48: 303–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L. 1994. Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 33–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L., W. V. Brown &B. N. Smith. 1975. Systematics of photosynthetic carbon fixation pathways inEuphorbia. Taxon 24: 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L., E. Rupert &D. Koutnik. 1982. Systematic significance of pollen nuclear number in Euphorbiaceae, tribe Euphorbieae. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mark P. Simmons

    Present address: L. H. Bailey Hortorium, 462 Mann Library, Cornell University, 14853-4301, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Richmond, 23173, Richmond, VA, U.S.A.

    Mark P. Simmons

  2. Department of Biology, University of Richmond, 23173, Richmond, VA, U.S.A.

    W. John Hayden

Authors
  1. Mark P. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. John Hayden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, M.P., Hayden, W.J. Revision of the cerrado hemicryptophytic Chamaesyce of Boissier's “Pleiadeniae” (Euphorbiaceae). Brittonia 49, 155–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2807678

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2807678

Key words

Search

Navigation