Abstract
Comparisons of midribs of three cycad genera,Chigua, Cycas, andStangeria, the only three genera characterized by midribs in the pinnae, show that those ofChigua andStangeria are very similar to each other and quite unlike those ofCycas. Midribs ofCycas include a single, median vein, and the pinnae of these species lack lateral veins. Pinnae midribs ofChigua andStangeria include several (2–5 and 2–8, respectively) longitudinal parallel veins, and dichotomizing lateral veins arising from the midrib. Pinnae of other cycads, includingZamia, with whichChigua appears to be most closely allied, exhibit evenly spaced, longitudinally parallel, dichotomizing veins, a character considered to be primitive. All veins in cycad leaves have a single mesarch protoxylem pole. The midrib condition inChigua andStangeria represents an advanced state in comparison to that in the leaf of the Marattiales, for example, where there is a single veined midrib but with numerous mesarch protoxylem poles. It would appear that the midrib has been derived independently at least three times within the cycads, once in each major group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Bierhorst, D. W. 1971. Morphology of vascular plants. Macmillan, New York.
Bold, H. C., C. J. Alexopoulos &T. Delevoryas. 1973. Morphology of plants and fungi. Ed. 2 Harper & Row, New York.
Brashier, C. K. 1968. Vascularization of cycad leaflets. Phytomorphology 17: 35–43.
Campbell, D. H. 1911. The Eusporangiatae. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. No. 140.
Chamberlain, C. J. 1935. Gymnosperms: structure and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Clark, D. B. &D. A. Clark. 1992. Leaf demography of a neotropical rain forest cycad,Zamia skinneri (Zamiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 79: 28–33.
Gifford, E. M. &A. S. Foster 1988. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. W. H. Freeman, New York.
Gould, R. E. &T. Delevoryas 1977. The biology ofGlossopteris: evidence from pertrified seed-bearing and pollen-bearing organs. Alcheringa 1: 387–399.
Gray, A. 1950. Manual of botany. Ed. 8. M. Fernald, editor. American Book Co., New York.
Greguss, P. 1968. Xylotomy of the living cycads. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
Harris, J. G. &M. Woolf Harris. 1994. Plant indentification terminology. Spring Lake Publishing. Spring Lake, Utah.
Lang, W. H. 1897. Studies in the development and morphology of cycadean sporangia: I. The microsporangia ofStangeria paradoxa. Ann. Bot. 11: 421–438.
Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. Macmillan, New York.
Loconte, H. &D. Stevenson 1990. Cladistics of the Spermatophyta. Brittonia 42: 197–211.
Mamay, S. 1976. Paleozoic origin of the cycads. Geological Survey Professional Paper 934. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Matte, H. 1904. Recherches sur l'appareil libero-ligneux des Cycadees. Mem. Soc. Linn. Normandie 22: 1–233.
— 1905. Complements a la structure meriphytaire duBowenia spectabilis. Assoc. Franc. Advancem. Sci. 1905: 409–416.
Moretti, A. 1990. Karyotypic data on North and Central American Zamiaceae (Cycadales) and their phylogenetic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 77: 1016–1029.
Moretti, A., P. Caputo, S. Cozzolino & L. Gaudio. 1993. Karyotypes of new world cycads. Pages 263–269.In: D. Stevenson & K. Norstog, editors. Cycad 90, Second International Conference on the Biology of Cycads, Townsville, Australia.
Nixon, K., W. Crepet, D. Stevenson &E. Friis 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 484–533.
Norstog, K. J. 1987. Cycad hybridization studies. Fairchild Trop. Grad. Bull. 42(3): 20–23.
Ogura, Y. 1972. Comparative anatomy of vegetative organs of the pteridophytes. Handb. Pflanzenanat. 7(3): 1–503.
Pant, D. D. 1977. The plant ofGlossopteris. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 56: 1–23.
Poole, J. P. 1923. Comparative anatomy of leaf of cycads, with reference to the Cycadofilicales. Bot. Gaz. 76: 203–214.
Sahni, B. 1948. The Pentoxylae: a new group of Jurassic gymnosperms from the Rajmahal hills of India. Bot. Gaz. 110: 47–80.
Schuster, J. 1932. Cycadaceae.In: A Engler, editor. Das Pflanzenreich 99(IV.1): 1–168.
Stevenson, D. W. 1990aChigua, a new genus in the Zamiaceae with comments on its biogeographie significance. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 169–172.
— 1990b. Morphology and systematics of the Cycadales. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 8–55.
— 1992. A formal classification of the extant cycads. Brittonia 44: 220–223.
Stevenson, D. W. 1996. The phlyogenetic systematics of the Cycadales. Telopea 7: in press.
—. 1993. The world list of cycads. Encephalartos 33: 19–25.
—. 1989. The systematic value of the monosaccharide composition and distribution pattern of cycad mucilages. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 17: 185–190.
Vorster, P. 1988. Growing cycads in a Miami-type climate. Fairchild Trop. Gard. Bull. 43(2): 17–26.