Skip to main content
Log in

Sectional limits and phylogenetic considerations in Carex section Ceratocystis (Cyperaceae)

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carex L. sectionCeratocystis Dumort. is distinct from the closely related sectionSpirostachyae (Drejer) L. Bailey. Differences in pistillate spike morphology, achene shape, and perigynium epidermis are augmented by chemical, cytological, and micromorphological evidence. Character compatibility analysis has been used to reconstruct the phylogenetic history of the sedges in sectionCeratocystis. The resulting network is shown to be robust when tested with cytological, ecological, and micromorphological data not included in its construction. Agmatoploidy has been the dominant process of chromosomal evolution in the section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bailey, L. H. 1889. Notes onCarex. XI. Studies of the types of various species of the genusCarex. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 1: 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, D. de, A. Camara & N. Malheiros. 1949. X-rays in the centromere problem ofLuzula purpurea Link. Genet. Iber. 1: 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, A. O. 1980.Carex In: T. G. Tutin et al., editors. Flora Europaea. Vol. 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crins, W. J. G. 1985. The taxonomy ofCarex sectionCeratocystis in North America and northern Eurasia. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Botany, University of Toronto.

  • Davies, E. W. 1953a. Notes onCarex flava and its allies. I. A. sedge new to the British Isles. Watsonia 3: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1953b. Notes onCarex flava and its allies. II.Carex lepidocarpa in the British Isles. Watsonia 3: 70–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1953c. Notes onCarex flava and its allies. III. The taxonomy and morphology of the British representatives. Watsonia 3: 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1953d. Notes onCarex flava and its allies. IV. Geographic distribution. Watsonia 3: 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1955. The cytogenetics ofCarex flava and its allies. Watsonia 3: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drejer, S. 1844. Symbolae Caricologicae. Academia Scientiarum Danica. Hafniae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estabrook, G. F. 1977. Does common equal primitive? Syst. Bot. 2: 36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federov, A. A., editor. 1969. Chromosome numbers in flowering plants. V. L. Komarov Botanical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the U.S.S.R., Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, E. 1835. Corpus Florarum Provincialium Sueciae. I. Floram Scanicam. Upsaliae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannasi, D. E. 1978. Systematic aspects of flavonoid biosynthesis and evolution. Bot. Rev. 44: 339–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J. B. 1971. Distribution and taxonomic significance of flavonoids in the leaves of the Cyperaceae. Phytochemistry 10: 1569–1574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heilborn, O. 1924. Chromosome numbers and dimensions, species-formation and phylogeny in the genusCarex. Hereditas 5: 129–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. Chromosome studies in Cyperaceae. III–IV. Hereditas 25: 224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, F. J. 1971. New species ofCarex from Mexico and Guatemala. Brittonia 23: 144–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, T. 1903. Studies in the Cyperaceae. XX. “Greges Caricum”. Amer. J. Sci. Ser. 4, 16: 445–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreczetovicz, V. 1935.Carex.In: V. L. Komarov, editor. Flora URSS. Vol. 3. Acad. Sci. URSS, Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kükenthal, G. 1909. Cyperaceae—Caricoideae. Das Pflanzenreich 4(20): 1–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, K. K. 1935. Cyperaceae—Cariceae. N. Amer. Fl. 18: 1–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, C. A. 1981. A manual method for character compatibility analysis. Taxon 30: 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. The role of hypothesized direction of characters in the estimation of evolutionary history. Taxon 33: 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — & G. F. Estabrook. 1985. Compatibility methods in systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelmes, E. 1952. Facts and speculations on phylogeny in the tribe Cariceae of the Cyperaceae. I. General considerations. Kew Bull. 1951: 427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmgren, A. 1959.Carex-gruppenFulvellae Fr. i Fennoskandien. Fl. Fennica 2.

  • Radford, A. E., W. C. Dickison, W. C. Massey & C. R. Bell. 1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savile, D. B. O. & J. A. Calder. 1953. Phylogeny ofCarex in light of parasitism by the smut fungi. Canad. J. Bot. 31: 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, B. 1982. Karyology and hybridization in theCarex flava complex in Switzerland. Feddes Repert 93: 23–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. Notes on the nomenclature and taxonomy of theCarex flava group in Europe. Watsonia 14: 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. Life histories in clonal plants of theCarex flava group. J. Ecol. 72: 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallent, R. C. & D. E. Wujek. 1983. Scanning electron microscopy as an aid to taxonomy of sedges (Cyperaceae:Carex). Micron Microscopica Acta 14: 271–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, D. H. 1979. Biosystematic studies of theCarex flava complex. I. Flowering Acta Bot. Neerl. 28: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crins, W.J., Ball, P.W. Sectional limits and phylogenetic considerations in Carex section Ceratocystis (Cyperaceae). Brittonia 40, 38–47 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2806873

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2806873

Keywords

Navigation