Abstract
A study analysing the pubescence pattern of leaflets, branchlets and bracts, leaflet size and shape, leaflet apex shape, number of leaflets per leaf, leaflet phyllotaxy, flower size, fruit size and shape, pollinic tetrad size, and exine sculpture pattern of the genusMagonia St. Hil. proved that distinction between the two speciesM. glabrata St. Hil. andM. pubescens St. Hil. is not possible because of the continuous gradient of these characteristics. The results led to the conclusion that the genusMagonia is monospecific, and it was decided that the valid name should beMagonia pubescens St. Hil., of which the nameMagonia glabrata St. Hil. is now a synonym.
Literature Cited
Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method. A revised description. Sv. Bot. Tidskr., Uppsala 54: 561–564.
Joly, C. A. & G. M. Felippe. 1980. Fenologia deMagonia pubescens. CiÊnc. Cult., SÃo Paulo (in press).
Melhem, T. S. & A.C. Campos. 1969. Pollen grains of the plants of the “cerrado”: Icacinaceae, Martyniaceae and Sapindaceae. Anais Acad. Brasil. Ci. 41: 471–483.
— & M. E. R. Mattos. 1972. Variabilidade de forma nos grÃos de polen deEriope crassipes Benth. Labiatae. Hoehnea 2: 1–10.
Radlkofer, L. 1892–1900. Sapindaceae.In: C. F. P. Martius, Flora Brasiliensis. 13(3): 225–680.
-. 1896. Sapindaceae.In: A. Engler & K. Prantl. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. 3 (5): 277–366.
-. 1965. Sapindaceae.In: A. Engler. Das Pflanzenreich. 98: 1469–1474.
Saint Hilaire, M. A. de. 1824. Relation d’um empoisonement occasioné pour le miel de la guÊpeLecheguana. Bull. Soc. Philom. Paris, p. 78.
—. 1825. Relation d’un empoisonement occasioné pour le miel de la guÊpeLecheguana. Mem. Mus. Hist. Nat. 12: 337–348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joly, C.A., Felippe, G.M. & Melhem, T.S. Taxonomic studies in Magonia St. Hil. (Sapindaceae). Brittonia 32, 380–386 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2307/2806740
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2806740