Skip to main content
Log in

Isozymes of coreopsis section Calliopsis (Compositae): Genetic variation within and divergence among the species

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enzyme electrophoresis was employed to examine genetic variation within and among the three diploid (n=12) species comprisingCoreopsis sectionCalliopsis: C. leavenworthii, C. paludosa andC. tinctoria. Twelve enzymes specified by 20 genes were included, and those isozymes localized in the plastids were identified for several of the enzymes. Mean genetic identities calculated for pair-wise comparisons of 22 populations (four ofC. leavenworthii, one forC. paludosa, and 17 ofC. tinctoria) reveal no genetic differentiation betweenC. leavenworthii andC. tinctoria, whereasC. paludosa exhibits lowered values with the other two taxa. These results are in general agreement with concepts of relationships inferred from morphological and biosystematic data. That is,C. paludosa has been viewed as more distinct fromC. leavenworthii andC. tinctoria than the latter two are from each other. The high similarity betweenC. leavenworthii andC. tinctoria is somewhat unexpected, however, given the several morphological features that serve consistently to distinguish them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Crawford, D. J. 1983. Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. Pages 257–287.In: S. D. Tanksley & T. J. Orton, editors. Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, part A. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • — & R. J. Bayer. 1981. Allozyme divergence inCoreopsis cyclocarpa. Syst. Bot. 6: 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — & E. B. Smith. 1982a. Allozyme variation inCoreopsis nuecensoides andC. nuecensis, a progenitor-derivative species pair. Evolution 36: 379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1982b. Allozyme divergence betweenCoreopsis basalis andC. wrightii (Compositae). Syst. Bot. 7: 359–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1984. Allozyme divergence and intraspecific variation inCoreopsis grandiflora (Compositae). Syst. Bot. 9: 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1980.Coreopsis. Pages 52–58.In: L. S. Radford, executive editor, Vascular plants of the southeastern United States, Vol. 1. Asteraceae. Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. J. 1964. Disc-electrophoresis II. Methods and application to human serum proteins. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 121: 404–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gastony, G. J. & D. C. Darrow. 1983. Chloroplastic and cytosolic isozymes of the homosporous fernAthyrium filix-femina L. Amer. J. Bot. 70: 1409–1415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, L. D. 1973. Enzyme differentiation and phylogeny inClarkia franciscana, C. rubicunda andC. amoena. Evolution 27: 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1977. Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1981a. Gene number in species of Astereae that have different chromosome numbers. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 78: 3726–3729.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1981b. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Prog. Phytochem. 7: 1–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. Conservation and duplication of isozymes in plants. Science 216: 373–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — & N. F. Weeden. 1981. Correlation between subcellular location and phosphoglucose isomerase variability. Evolution 35: 1019–1022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Amer. Naturalist 106: 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. U.S.A. 70: 3321–3323.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherff, E. E. 1955.Coreopsis. Pages 4–40.In: E. E. Sherff & E. J. Alexander, editors. Compositae-Heliantheae-Coreopsidinae. N. Amer. Fl. Ser. II. Pt. 2.

  • Smith, E. B. 1975. The chromosome numbers of North AmericanCoreopsis with phyletic interpretations. Bot. Gaz. 136: 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1976. A biosystematic survey ofCoreopsis in eastern United States and Canada. Sida 6: 123–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978. Notes onCoreopsis. Sida 7: 304–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983. Phyletic trends in sectionsEublepharis andCalliopsis of the genusCoreopsis (Compositae). Amer. J. Bot. 74: 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solits, D. E., C. H. Haufler, D. C. Darrow & G. J. Gastony. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. Amer. Fern J. 73: 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeden, N. F. & L. D. Gottlieb. 1980. The genetics of chloroplast enzymes. J. Heredity 71: 392–396.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford, D.J., Smith, E.B. & Pilatowski, R.E. Isozymes of coreopsis section Calliopsis (Compositae): Genetic variation within and divergence among the species. Brittonia 36, 375–381 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2806598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2806598

Navigation