Abstract
Nomenclatural innovations are validated inAster, Chrysopsis, Eupatorium,Gaillardia, Helianthus, Prenanthes, Silphium, andSolidago. The genusChrysopsis is maintained as distinct fromHeterotheca, andHelianthus smithii Heiser is reduced to synonymy underH. microcephalus Torr. & Gray.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Abrams, Leroy &Roxana Ferris 1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Vol.4. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California.
Bentham, G. 1873.In: G. Bentham and J. D. Hooker, Genera Plantarum. Vol.2, part 1.
Bowers, Frank D. 1972. A biosystematic study ofHeterotheca, section Pityopsis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee.
Correll, D. S. &M. C. Johnston 1970. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation. Renner, Texas.
Cronquist, Arthur 1952. Compositae, vol.3, pp. 323–545.In: Henry A. Gleason, The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Hafner. New York.
-Cronquist, Arthur 1955. Compositae, vol. 5.In: C. L. Hitchcock et al., Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 17(5).
— 1963. Compositae, pp. 665–767.In: Henry A. Gleason and Arthur Cronquist, Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Van Nostrand, Princeton, N.J.
— 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Houghton Mifflin. Boston.
— 1973. Compositae, pp. 461–557.In: C. L. Hitchcock and Arthur Cronquist, Manual of the Northwest flora. University of Washington Press. Seattle.
Dress, W. J. 1953. A revision of the genusChrysopsis in eastern North America. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Godfrey, R. K. 1950. Studies in the Compositae of North Carolina. III. An enumeration of noteworthy distribution records. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.66: 186–194.
Gray, Asa 1884. Synoptical flora of North America. Vol.1, part 2.
Harms, Vernon L. 1965. Cytogenetic evidence supporting the merger ofHeterotheca andChrysopsis (Compositae). Brittonia17: 11–16.
Heiser, C.B., Jr. 1969. The North American sunflowers (Helianthus). Mem. Torrey Bot. Club22(3): 1–218.
— &D. M. Smith 1964. Species crosses inHelianthus: II. Polyploid species. Rhodora66: 344–358.
Linnaeus, Carl 1751. Philosophia botanica.
Milstead, W. L. 1964. A revision of the North American species ofPrenanthes. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
Morton, G. H. 1972. The taxonomy of theSolidago arguta-boottii complex. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee.
Radford, Albert E., Harry E. Ahles, &C. Ritchie Bell 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill.
Rock, H. F. L. 1956. The binomials ofHelenium in Walter’s Flora Caroliniana. Rhodora58: 311–317.
Shinners, Lloyd H. 1951. The north Texas species ofHeterotheca, includingChrysopsis (Compositae). Field & Lab.19: 66–71.
Small, John K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. Published by the author. New York.
Sullivan, V. I. 1972. Investigations of the breeding systems, formation of auto- and alloploids and the reticulate pattern of hybridization in North AmericanEupatorium (Compositae). Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
Wagenknecht, B. L. 1960. Revision ofHeterotheca, section Heterotheca (Compositae). Rhodora62: 61–76; 97–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cronquist, A. Notes on the asteraceae of the Southeastern United States. Brittonia 29, 217–225 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805855
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805855