Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. VII. The floral biology of Nuphar Lutea subsp. macrophylla

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The floral biology ofNuphar lutea subsp.macrophylla, native to Central Texas, has been investigated. The flowers are protogynous with anthesis occurring over a period of several days. Flowers are visited by a number of insects but are effectively pollinated by the beetleDonacia piscatrix Lac., which spends its entire life history in association withNuphar. Evidence is assembled which suggests that the overall floral structure together with the sequence of floral development and the timing of sepal movements (i.e., the opening and closure of the flower) are primary adaptations to assure beetle pollination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Baker, H. G. 1963. Evolutionary mechanisms in pollination biology. Science139: 877–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, E. O. 1956. Taxonomic revision of the genusNuphar Sm. of North America and Europe. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.72: 317–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, F. M. 1930. A review of our present knowledge of the geological history of the insects. Psyche37: 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspary, R. 1888. Nymphaeaceae. In: A. Engler and K. A. E. Prantl. Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien III.2: 1–10, Leipzig.

  • Cramer, J. M., A. D. J. Meeuse &P. A. Teunissen 1975. A note on the pollination of nocturnally flowering species ofNymphaea. Acta. Bot. Neerl.24: 489–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpino, F. 1875. Ulteriori osservazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale. Milan. Pt. II. fasc. II. Estratto dagli Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Milano. Vol.12.

  • Diels, L. 1916. KÄferblumen bei den Ranales und ihre Bedeutung für die Phylogenie der Angiospermen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.34: 758–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A. J. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K.. &L. Pijl van der 1971. The principles of pollination ecology. 2nd ed. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V. 1950. The pollination ofCalycanthus occidentalis Amer. J. Bot.37: 294–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handlirsch, A. 1925. Palaeontologie.In: C. Schröder, Handbuch der Entomologie, Fisher, Jena.3: 117–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegi, G. 1912. Ills. Fl. von Mitt.-Europ. Munich, J. F. Lehmanns.3: 444–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, Y. 1955.Nuphar Monograph. J. Ecol.43: 342–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, C. E. 1940a. Morphology of the immature stages of some northern Michigan Donaciini (Chrysomelidae; Coleoptera). Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci.25: 243–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940b. Limnological relationships of some northern Michigan Donaciini (Chrysomelidae; Coleoptera). Trans. Amer. Microscop. Soc.59: 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1940c. The relation ofDonacia larvae (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) to dissolved oxygen. Ecology21: 176–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, D. F. 1969. Respiratory physiology of the larva ofDonacia Simplex, a root-piercing beetle. J. Insect Physiol.15: 1517–1536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, P. 1894. Blumen und Insekten auf den nordfriesischen Inseln. Schriften Naturwiss Vereins, Kiel and Leipzig9: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1895. Weitere Beobachtungen über Blumen und Insekten auf den nordfriesischen Inseln. Schriften Naturwiss. Vereins, Kiel10: 226.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1908. Handbook of flower pollination (transl. by J. R. A. Davis) Vol.2. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, H. 1955. Einführung in die Blütenokologie (1st and 2nd ed.) Fisher, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppik, E. E. 1957. Evolutionary relationships between entomophilous plants and anthophilous insects. Evolution11: 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1963. Fossil evidence of floral evolution. Lloydia26: 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, J. H. 1915. The origin of anthophily among the Coleoptera. Psyche22: 67–84, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1918. The flower and the bee; Plant life and pollination. C. Scribner’s Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaha, Y. J. 1952. The limnological relations of insects to certain aquatic flowering plants. Trans. Amer. Microscop. Soc.71: 355–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, M. F. 1958. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. I. The nature of the stamens. Phytomorphology8: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Moseley,.

    Google Scholar 

  • —Moseley,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. 1883. Fertilization of flowers. Trans. & ed. by D. W. Thompson. Macmillan Publishing Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, L.van der 1960. Ecological aspects of flower evolution. I. Phyletic Evolution. Evolution14: 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T. &J. R. Arias 1975. A study of the floral biology ofVictoria amazonica (Poepp.) Sowerby (Nymphaeaceae). Acta Amazonica5: 109–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. W. 1975. Insect ecology. J. Wiley-Interscience. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, M. &P. Yeo 1972. The pollination of flowers. Taplinger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. 1889. Flowers and insects. I. Bot. Gaz.14: 122–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodendorf, B. B. &A. G. Ponomarenko 1962. Coleoptera. In: Foundations of Palaeontology.9: 241–267. (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, A. 1892. BeitrÄge zur Morphologic und Biologie der Blüten. II. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.10: 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. 1906. über den Polymorphismus beiNuphar. Allg. Bot. Z. Syst.12: 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1907-08. Zur Systematik vonCastalia undNymphaea. Bull. Herb. Boissier II.7: 853–868, 901–916, 981–996. 1907;8: 67–74. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. & N. F. Hughes 1973. The insect and the plant: progressive palaeoecological integration. In: H. F. van Emden (editor). Insect plant relationships. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London Symp.6: 143–155.

  • Sporne, K. R. 1975. The morphology of Angiosperms. St. Martin’s Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprengel, C. K. 1793. Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Blumen. Berlin, Vieweg. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenis, J. M. &R. T. Mitchell 1950. Leaf beetle versus Lotus. J. Wildlife Managem.14: 478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Transl. by C. Jeffery. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thien, L. B. 1974. Floral biology ofMagnolia. Amer. J. Bot.61: 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trelease, W. 1879. Die Insekten als unbewusste Blumenzüchter. Amer. Naturalist.13: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. 1962. Duftdrüsen im Dienste der BestÄubung. Akad. Wiss. Abh. Math.-Naturwiss. Kl.10: 599–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnstorf, D. 1896. Botanische Beobachtungen aus der Provinz Brandenburg im Jahre 1894. B. Blütenbiologisches. Verh. Bot. Vereins. Vol.37.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by grants to the Senior author (Schneider) from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and the Faculty Committee for Organized Research at Southwest Texas State University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, E.L., Moore, L.A. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. VII. The floral biology of Nuphar Lutea subsp. macrophylla. Brittonia 29, 88–99 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805746

Keywords

Navigation