Abstract
Several interpretations concerning the relationships of the Psilotaceae are discussed. The conclusion that the Psilotaceae are filicalean ferns is defended. New evidence which has appeared since earlier papers on the subject confirms this basic conclusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Bierhorst, D. W. 1954. The origin of branching in the aerial shoot ofPsilotum nudum. Virginia J. Sci.5: 72–78.
— 1965. Older gametophytes and young sporophytes ofSchizaea melanesica. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club.92: 475–488.
— 1966. The fleshy, cylindrical, subterranean gametophyte ofSchizaea melanesica. Amer. J. Bot.53: 123–133.
— 1968a. Observations onSchizaea andActinostachys spp., includingA. oligostachys, sp. nov. Amer. J. Bot.55: 87–108.
— 1968b. On the Stromatopteridaceae (fam. nov.) and on the Psilotaceae. Phytomorphology18: 232–268.
— 1969a. OnStromatopteris and its ill-defined organs. Amer. J. Bot.56: 160–174.
— 1969b. Leaf development inSchizaea andActinostachys. Amer. J. Bot.56: 860–870.
— 1971a. Morphology and anatomy of new species ofSchizaea andActinostachys. Amer. J. Bot.58: 634–648.
— 1971b. Morphology of Vascular Plants. Macmillan Co., New York.
— 1971c. Soral and pinnule ontogeny inGleichenia linearis. Amer. J. Bot.58: 417–423.
- 1973. Non-appendicular fronds in the Filicales. pp. 45–57.In: A. C. Jermy, J. A. Crabbe & B. A. Thomas (Editors). The Phylogeny and Classification of the Ferns. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.67 (Suppl. 1).
— 1974. Variable expression of the appendicular status of the megaphyll in extant ferns with particular reference to the Hymenophyllaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.61: 408–426.
— 1975. Gametophytes and embryos ofActinostachys pennula, A. wagneri, andSchizaea elegans, with notes on other species. Amer. J. Bot.62: 319–335.
- In press. On the stem apex, leaf initiation and early leaf ontogeny in filicalean ferns. Amer. J. Bot.
Bower, F. O. 1894. Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members Equisetineae and Lycopodineae. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London185: 473–572.
Darnell-Smith, G. P. 1917. The gametophyte ofPsilotum. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.52: 79–91.
Holloway, J. E. 1918. The prothallus and young plant ofTmesipteris. Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst.50: 1–44.
— 1921. Further studies on the prothallus, embryo, and young sporophyte ofTmesipteris. Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst.53: 386–422.
— 1939. The gametophyte, embryo, and young rhizome ofPsilotum triquetrum Sw. Ann. Bot. (London) (n.s.)3: 313–336.
Jeffrey, E. C. 1902. The structure and development of the stem in pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B.195: 119–146.
Kidston, R. andW. H. Lang 1917–1921. On Old Red Sandstone plants showing structure, from the Rhynie Chert bed, Aberdeenshire. I. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin.51: 761–784 (1917). II.52: 603–627 (1921). III.52: 643–680 (1921). IV.52: 831–854 (1921).
Lawson, A. A. 1917. The prothallus ofTmesipteris tannensis. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.51: 785–794.
Lugardon, B. 1976. Sur la structure fine de l’exospore dans les divers groupes de Pteridophytes actuelles (microspores et isospores). Linn. Soc. Symposium Ser. No. 1. 231–250.
Roth, I. 1963a. Histogenese der Luftsposse und Bildung der “dichotomen” Verzweigungen vonPsilotum nudum. Advan. Frontiers Plant Sci.7: 157–180.
— 1963b. Histogenese und morphologische Deutung der BlÄtter vonPsilotum nudum. Flora153: 90–111.
Rouffa, A. S. 1971. An appendagelessPsilotum. Introduction to aerial shoot morphology. Amer. Fern J.61: 75–86.
Sahni, B. 1925. OnTmesipteris vieillardi Dang., an erect terrestrial species from New Caledonia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B.213: 113–170.
Sykes, M. G. 1908. The anatomy and morphology ofTmesipteris. Ann. Bot. (London)22: 63–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bierhorst, D.W. The systematic position of Psilotum and Tmesipteris. Brittonia 29, 3–13 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805738
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805738