Skip to main content
Log in

The systematic position of Psilotum and Tmesipteris

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several interpretations concerning the relationships of the Psilotaceae are discussed. The conclusion that the Psilotaceae are filicalean ferns is defended. New evidence which has appeared since earlier papers on the subject confirms this basic conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bierhorst, D. W. 1954. The origin of branching in the aerial shoot ofPsilotum nudum. Virginia J. Sci.5: 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. Older gametophytes and young sporophytes ofSchizaea melanesica. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club.92: 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1966. The fleshy, cylindrical, subterranean gametophyte ofSchizaea melanesica. Amer. J. Bot.53: 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968a. Observations onSchizaea andActinostachys spp., includingA. oligostachys, sp. nov. Amer. J. Bot.55: 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1968b. On the Stromatopteridaceae (fam. nov.) and on the Psilotaceae. Phytomorphology18: 232–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1969a. OnStromatopteris and its ill-defined organs. Amer. J. Bot.56: 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1969b. Leaf development inSchizaea andActinostachys. Amer. J. Bot.56: 860–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1971a. Morphology and anatomy of new species ofSchizaea andActinostachys. Amer. J. Bot.58: 634–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1971b. Morphology of Vascular Plants. Macmillan Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1971c. Soral and pinnule ontogeny inGleichenia linearis. Amer. J. Bot.58: 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - 1973. Non-appendicular fronds in the Filicales. pp. 45–57.In: A. C. Jermy, J. A. Crabbe & B. A. Thomas (Editors). The Phylogeny and Classification of the Ferns. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.67 (Suppl. 1).

  • — 1974. Variable expression of the appendicular status of the megaphyll in extant ferns with particular reference to the Hymenophyllaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.61: 408–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1975. Gametophytes and embryos ofActinostachys pennula, A. wagneri, andSchizaea elegans, with notes on other species. Amer. J. Bot.62: 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • - In press. On the stem apex, leaf initiation and early leaf ontogeny in filicalean ferns. Amer. J. Bot.

  • Bower, F. O. 1894. Studies in the morphology of spore-producing members Equisetineae and Lycopodineae. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London185: 473–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnell-Smith, G. P. 1917. The gametophyte ofPsilotum. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.52: 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. E. 1918. The prothallus and young plant ofTmesipteris. Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst.50: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1921. Further studies on the prothallus, embryo, and young sporophyte ofTmesipteris. Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst.53: 386–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1939. The gametophyte, embryo, and young rhizome ofPsilotum triquetrum Sw. Ann. Bot. (London) (n.s.)3: 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, E. C. 1902. The structure and development of the stem in pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B.195: 119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidston, R. andW. H. Lang 1917–1921. On Old Red Sandstone plants showing structure, from the Rhynie Chert bed, Aberdeenshire. I. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin.51: 761–784 (1917). II.52: 603–627 (1921). III.52: 643–680 (1921). IV.52: 831–854 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. A. 1917. The prothallus ofTmesipteris tannensis. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb.51: 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugardon, B. 1976. Sur la structure fine de l’exospore dans les divers groupes de Pteridophytes actuelles (microspores et isospores). Linn. Soc. Symposium Ser. No. 1. 231–250.

  • Roth, I. 1963a. Histogenese der Luftsposse und Bildung der “dichotomen” Verzweigungen vonPsilotum nudum. Advan. Frontiers Plant Sci.7: 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1963b. Histogenese und morphologische Deutung der BlÄtter vonPsilotum nudum. Flora153: 90–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouffa, A. S. 1971. An appendagelessPsilotum. Introduction to aerial shoot morphology. Amer. Fern J.61: 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahni, B. 1925. OnTmesipteris vieillardi Dang., an erect terrestrial species from New Caledonia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B.213: 113–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, M. G. 1908. The anatomy and morphology ofTmesipteris. Ann. Bot. (London)22: 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bierhorst, D.W. The systematic position of Psilotum and Tmesipteris. Brittonia 29, 3–13 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805738

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805738

Keywords

Navigation