Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Taxonomic and biosystematic categories

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Babcock, E. B. &Stebbins, G. L. 1938. The American species ofCrepis: their relationships and distribution as affected by polyploidy and apomixis. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ.504:1–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G. 1947.Melandrium (Roehling em.) Fries. Jour. Ecol.35: 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948a. Stages in invasion and replacement demonstrated by species ofMelandrium. Jour. of Eeol.36: 96–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948b. The ecotypes ofMelandrium dioicum (L. emend.) Coss. and Germ. New Phytol.47: 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, W. M. 1957. Cytotaxonomy of sectionPsammelymus of the genusElymus. Canad. Jour. Bot.35: 951–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P. de 1813. Théorie éIémentaire de la botanique, ou exposition des principes de la classification naturelle et de l’art de décrire et d’étudier les végétaux. Paris.

  • Clausen, J., Keck, D. D. &Hiesey, W. M. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ.520: 1–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wolf, G. P. 1957. Chromosome numbers in higher plants. Rhodora59: 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Rietz, G. E. 1930. The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.24: 333–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray’s Manual of Botany, 8th ed. New York.

  • Gilmonr, J. S. L. &Heslop-Harrison, J, 1953. The deme terminology and the units of microevolutionary change. Genetiea27: 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V., 1950. Genetic and taxonomic studies inGilia. I.Gilia capitata. Aliso2: 239–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952. Isolation and hybridization betweenAquilegia formosa andA. pubescens. Aliso2: 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, J. W. 1939. Experimental taxonomy. IV. Population differentiation in North American and European sea plantains allied toPlantago maritima L. New Phytol.38: 293–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946. Ecotypic differentiation. New Phytol.45: 254–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, Å. 1946. Apomixis in higher plants. Part I. The mechanism of apomixis. Acta Univ. Lund. II.42: 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947a. Apomixis in higher plants. Part II. The causal aspect of apomixis. Acta Univ. Lund. II.43: 71–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947b. Apomixis in higher plants. Part III. Biotype and species formation. Acta Univ. Lund. II.43: 183–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg, A. 1952a. Heterosis in F1 combinations inGaleopsis. I. Hereditas38: 33–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952b. Heterosis in F1 combinations inGaleopsis. II. Hereditas38: 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. B. 1956. Subsexual reproduction inAgropyron. Heredity.10: 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H. 1957. A proposed Flora of Europe. Taxon6: 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J., 1942. Evolution, the modern synthesis. London.

  • Kappert, H. 1956. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Variabilität eines Totalapomiktea (Taraxacum officinale Web.) Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 67: 325–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A. 1944. The dioecious forms of Rumex subgenusAcetosa in Scandinavia. Bot. Not. 1944: 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951. Taxonomical evaluation of polyploids. Caryologia3: 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. The foundations of eytotaxonomy. VIIIe Congr. Int. Bot. Paris Eapp. & Comm. Sect. 9, 10: 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A. & Löve, D. 1949. The geobotanieal significance of polyploidy. I. Polyploidy and latitude. Portug. Acta Biol. (A), R. B. Goldsehmidt Vol.: 273–352.

  • —. 1956. Cytotaxonomieal conspectus of the Icelandic flora. Aeta Horti Gotob.20: 65–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A., Löve, D. &Raymond, M. 1957. Cytotaxonomy ofCarex sectionCapillares. Canad. Jour. Bot.35: 715–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löve, D. 1944. Cytogenetic studies on dioeciousMelandrium. Bot. Not. 1944: 125–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marklund, G. 1939. Einige Sippen derRanunculus auricomus-Gruppe. Mem. Soe. Fauna & Flora Fenn.16: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Fröbildning utan befruktning och därmed sammanhängande mång-formighet hos växter. Soc. Sci. Fenn. Årsbok31B(2): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden-Jones, E. M. & Turrill, W. B. 1954. British knapweeds. A study in synthetie taxonomy. Ray Soc. Publ. 138: XIII and 210 pp.

  • Müntzing, A. 1930. Outlines to a genetic monograph ofGaleopsis. Hereditas13: 185–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1945. Hybrid vigour in crosses between pure lines ofGaleopsis Tetrahit. Hereditas31: 391–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannfeldt, J. A. 1938.Poa maroceana Nannf. n. sp. and P.rivulorum Maire & Trabut, two more tetraploida of sect.Ochlopoa A. & Gr., and some additional notes onOchlopoa. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.32: 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygren, A. 1954. Apomixis in the angiosperms. Bot. Rev.20: 577–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. 1686. Historia plantarum, species haetenus editas aliasque insuper multas noviter inventas atque deseriptas complectens. In qua agitur primo de plantis in genere, earumque partibus, accentibus et differentiis, etc. Tomus primus. Londini.

  • Riley, R. 1956. The influence of the breeding system on the genecology ofThlaspi alpestre L. New Phytol.55: 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R. C. 1957. Interspecific hybridization inLesquerella (Cruciferae). Contr. Gray Herb.181: 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothmaler, W. 1944. Systematische Einheiten in der Botanik. Repert. Sp. Nov.54: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Terminologie des subdivisions de l’espèce. VIIIe Cong. Int. Bot. Paris, Rapp. & Comm. Sect. 2, 4, 5, 6: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousi, A. 1956. Cytotaxonomy and reproduction in the apomicticRanunculus auricomus group. Ann. Bot. Soc. Vanamo29(2): 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, L. A. 1951. Cytology of inter-strain hybrids and the probable origin of variability inElymus glaucus. Amer. Jour. Bot.38: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen, T. &Gudjonsson, G. 1946. Spontaneous chromosome-aberrants in apomicticTaraxaca. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Skrifter4(2): 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York.

  • Turesson, G. 1922. The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas3: 211–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943. Variation in the apomictic microspecies ofAlchemilla vulgaris L. Bot. Not. 1943: 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956. Variation in the apomictic mierospeeies ofAlchemilla vulgaris L. II. Progeny tests in agamotypes with regard to morphological characters. Bot. Not.109: 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrill, W. B. 1948. British, plant life. London.

  • —. 1951. Some problems of plant range and distribution. Jour. Ecol.39: 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, D. H. 1949. The units of experimental taxonomy. Acta Biotheor.9: 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. The experimental taxonomy of two species ofViola. New Phytol.49; 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1951. Geographical distribution and isolation in some British eeospeeies.In: J. E Lousley (ed.) : The study of the distribution of British plants: 82–90.

  • Wilmott, A. J., 1949. Intraspecific categories of variation.In: A. J. Wilmott (ed.) : British flowering plants and modern systematic methods: 28–45.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, Durham, England

    D. H. Valentine & Áskell Löve

  2. Institut Botanique, l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

    D. H. Valentine & Áskell Löve

Authors
  1. D. H. Valentine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Áskell Löve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Visiting Professor, Université de Montréal, 1957.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valentine, D.H., Löve, Á. Taxonomic and biosystematic categories. Brittonia 10, 153–166 (1958). https://doi.org/10.2307/2804945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2804945

Keywords

Search

Navigation