Summary
Recent proposals concerning the reclassification of the Tulasnellaaceae and the Ceratobasidiaceae are examined and criticized. Considerations of basidial morphology and terminology relevant to the problem are discussed and definitions of basidial terms based on the discussion are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Baker, Gladys E. 1936. A study of the genusHelicogloea. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.23: 69–126.
Couch, J. N. 1938. The genusSeptobasidium. Univ. North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill.
Donk, M. A. 1954. A note on sterigmata in general. Bothalia6: 301–302.
—. 1956. Notes on resupinate Hymenomycetes-II. The tulasnelloid fungi. Reinwardtia3: 363–379.
GÄumann, E. 1926. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pilze. Jena.
—. 1949. Die Pilze. Grundzüge ihrer Entwicklungsgeschichte und Morphologie. Basel.
GÄumann, E. & Dodge, C. W. 1928. Comparative morphology of fungi. New York.
Juel, H. O. 1898. Die Kernteilungen in der Basidien und die Phylogenie der Basidiomyceten. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.32: 361–388.
Linder, D. H. 1940. Evolution of the Basidiomycetes and its relation to the terminology of the basidium. Mycologia32: 419–447.
Lohwag, H. 1937. Mykologische Studien XIII. Das Keimen der Basidie. Ann. Mycol.35: 157–193.
Martin, Gr. W. 1938. New or noteworthy fungi from Panama and Colombia. II. Mycologia30: 431–441.
Neuhoff, W. 1924. Zytologie und systematische Stellung der Auriculariaceen und Tremellaceen. Bot. Arch.8: 250–297.
Talbot, P. H. B. 1954. Micromorphology of the lower Hymenomycetes. Bothalia6: 249–299.
Whelden, R. M. 1935. Observations on the cytology ofSebacina globospora n. sp. Rhodora37: 121–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, G.W. The Tulasnelloid Fungi and their bearing on basidial terminology. Brittonia 9, 25–30 (1957). https://doi.org/10.2307/2804846
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2804846