Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cytogenetic studies on the boraginaceae

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, A. 1931. Some antipodean forms ofMyosotis. Gard. Chron. III.89: 262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. 1937. Cytology in its relation to taxonomy. Bot. Rev.3: 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, E. B. 1947. The GenusCrepis. Part I. The taxonomy, phylogeny, distribution, and evolution ofCrepis. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. T., Jr. 1940. Cytophyletic analysis of certain annual and biennial Crassulaceae. Madroño5: 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G. &Hooker, J. D. 1873–76. Genera plantarum. Vol.2, p. 832–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Anne. 1926. Recherches sur la structure anatomique du fruit des borraginacées. Lons-Le-Saunier, Imprimerie L. Declume. Thesis, Univ. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, W. M. 1940. Diploidy, polyploidy, and winter hardiness relationships in the flowering plants. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, August. 1921. Boraginaceae Boraginoideae-Cynoglosseae. Pflanzenreich4 (252).

  • ————— 1931. Boraginaceae, Boraginoideae-Cryptantheae. Pflanzenreich97: 1–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, D. 1949. [Abstr.] Proc. Va. Acad.1948–1949: 94.

  • Cain, Stanley A. 1944. Foundations of plant geography. Harper and Brothers, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. S. &Constance, L. 1947. Chromosome numbers in the Hydrophyllaceae: III. Univ. of Calif. Publ. Bot.18: 449–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J., Keck, D. D. & Hiesey, W. M. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. I. Effect of varied environments on western North American plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 520.

  • Darlington, C. D. &Janaki Ammal, E. K. 1945. Chromosome atlas of cultivated plants. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. &LaCour, L. F. 1947. The handling of chromosomes. Unwin Brothers Limited, Woking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Lars. 1945. Kromosomtalen hos nagra kärlväxter. Bot. Not.4: 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A. & Gilg, E. 1924. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Berlin.

  • Geitler, Lothar. 1936. Vergleichend-zytologische Untersuchungen anMyosotis. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.83: 707–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, Ronald. 1947. The geography of the flowering plants. Longmans Green and Co., London, New York, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesinger, R. 1937. Über hypo- und hyperdiploide Formen vonPetunia, Hyoscyamus, Lamium, und einige andere Chromosomenzählungen. Ber. Deuts. Bot. Ges.55: 556–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürke, M. 1897. Borraginaceae.In: A. & Prantl, K. Die Natürliche Pflanzenfamilien4(3a): 71–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A. 1946. The plant species in relation to polyploidy and apomixis. Hereditas32: 444–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusuleac, M. 1928. Sistemul boragineelor in lumina cercetarilor noui. (Le systeme des boraginées d’après recherches nouvelles.) Congr. Nat. Natur. Romana1: 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusuleac, M. &Tarnavschi, J. T. 1935. Bull. Facult. Sti. Cernauti9: 387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerup, O. 1932. Über Polyploide in Beziehung zu Klima, Ökologie, und Phylogenie. Hereditas16: 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, Charles B., Jr. &Whitaker, Thomas W. 1948. Chromosome number, polyploidy, and growth habit in Californian weeds. Am. Jour. Bot.35: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jodin, Henri. 1903. Recherches anatomiques sur les borraginées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. VII.17: 263–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Arthur M. 1931. Taxonomy of the flowering plants. The Century Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. P. V. 1945. A rapid squash technique for stem and root tips. Canad. Jour. Res. C.23: 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, I. M. 1923. Studies in the Boraginaceae. I. Contr. Gray Herb.68: 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1924a. Studies in the Boraginaceae. II. American native and immigrant borages of the Boraginoideae. Contr. Gray Herb.70: 1–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1924b. Studies in the Boraginaceae. III. The Old World genera of the Boraginoideae. Contr. Gray Herb.73: 42–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1925a. Studies in the Boraginaceae. IV. The North American Species ofCryptantha. Contr. Gray Herb.74: 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1925b. Studies in the Boraginaceae. V. Concerning the range and identity of certain American species, Asiatic borages. Contr. Gray Herb.75: 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1927. Studies in the Boraginaceae. VI. A revision of the South American Boraginoideae. Contr. Gray Herb.78: 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1928. Studies in the Boraginaceae. VII. The South American species ofHeliotropium. 2. Notes on various Boraginoideae. Contr. Gray Herb.81: 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1930. Studies in the Boraginaceae. VIII. 1. Observations on the species ofCordia andTournefortia known from Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentine. 2. Taxonomic notes concerning various borages. Contr. Gray Herb.92: 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Studies in the Boraginaceae. IX. 1. The Allocarya section ofPlagiobothrys in the Western United States: 2. Notes on various borages in the United States. Contr. Arnold Arb.3: 1–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935a. Studies in the Boraginaceae. X. Boraginaceae of northeastern South America. Jour. Arnold Arb.16: 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1935b. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XI. Species ofTournefortia andMesserschmidia in the Old World 2.Cryptantha. Jour. Arnold Arb.16: 145–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1937. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XII.Trigonitis in southwestern China. Jour. Arnold Arb.18: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1939. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XIII. New or otherwise noteworthy species from western U.S.A. Jour. Arnold Arb.20: 375–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XIV. Miscellaneous species from Asia, Malaysia and America. Jour. Arnold Arb.21: 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1940. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XV. Notes on some Mexican and Central American species ofCordia. Jour. Arnold Arb.21: 336–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1948. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XVI. Species chiefly from Mexico and western United States. Jour. Arnold Arb.29: 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1949. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XVII. Jour. Arnold Arb.30: 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1949. Studies in the Boraginaceae. XVIII. Boraginaceae of the Southern West Indies. Jour. Arnold Arb.30: 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Cour, L. 1937. Improvements in plant cytological technique. Bot. Rev.5: 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1941. Acetic-orcein. Stain Tech.16: 169–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Julia Ruth. 1937. A correlation of the taxonomy and the floral anatomy of certain of the Boraginaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 433–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, G. A. 1934. Compt. Rend. (Doklady.) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.1: 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levyns, Margaret R. 1934. The cytology ofLobostemon andEchiostachys in relation to taxonomy. Ann. Bot.48: 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litardière, R. de. 1943. Recherches caryologiques et caryo-taxonomiques sur les Boraginacées II. Nombres chromosomiques dans le genreEchium. Boissiera7: 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löve, A., &Löve, D. 1942. Cyto-taxonomic studies on boreal plants I. Some observations on Swedish and Icelandic plants. Kungl. Fysiograf. Sällskàpet Lund Förhand.12: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1943. The significance of differences in the distribution of diploids and polyploids. Hereditas29: 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1944. Cyto-taxonomical studies on boreal plants III. Some new chromosome numbers of Scandinavian plants. Ark. Bot.31A (12): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1948. Chromosome numbers of northern plant species. Dep. Agr. Rep. B. 3. Reykjavik.

  • Manton, I. 1932. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Ann. Bot.46: 509–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, H. &Sûto, T. 1935. Contributions to the idiogram study in phaner ogamous plants. I. Jour. Faculty of Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. V.5: 33–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millsaps, Vera. 1940. Structure and development of the seed ofCynoglossum amabile Stapf. and Drumm. Jour. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.56: 140–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulay, B. N. & Jaisingani, M. 1945. [Abstr.] Proc. 32nd Indian Sci. Congr. Nagpur. 49.

  • Müntzing, A. 1936. The evolutionary significance of auto-polyploidy. Hereditas21: 263–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Bruce A. 1943. Chromosome numbers and phylogenetic relationships in the Euphorbiaceae. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 527–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Record, Samuel & Mell, Clayton D. 1924. Timbers of tropical America. Yale Univ. Press.

  • Rehder, Alfred. 1947. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. The Macmillan Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, Harold A. 1938. Chromosome number relationships in the Leguminosae. Bibliogr. Genet.12: 175–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, T. C. N. 1931. Studies in the morphology of pollen grains Ia. Boraginaceae. Jour. Indian Bot. Soc.10: 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, John K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. The author, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. G. 1931. Cytology ofAnchusa and its relation to the taxonomy of the genus. Nature128: 493–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1932. Cytology ofAnchusa and its relation to the taxonomy of the genus. Bot. Gaz.94: 394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolovskaja, A. P. &Strelkova, O. S. 1941. Polyploidy and karyological races under conditions in the Arctic. Compt. Rend. (Doklady.) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.32: 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souèges, René. 1941. Embryogénie des Boragacées. Dévelopment de l’embryon chez leSymphytum officinale L. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]212: 245–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. Ledyard, Jr. 1938. Cytological characteristics associated with the different growth habits in the dicotyledons. Am. Jour. Bot.25: 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1940. The significance of polyploidy in plant evolution. Am. Nat.74: 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1947. Types of polyploids: Their classification and significance. Adv. Genet.1: 403–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strey, Martin. 1931. Karyologische Studien an Boraginoideae. Planta14: 682–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, T. 1936. Studies on the chromosome numbers in higher plants, with special reference to cytokinesis. I. Cytologia7: 544–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Harry G. 1925. Zur Embryologie der Hydrophyllaceen, Borraginaceen, und Heliotropiaceen mit besonderer Rucksicht auf die Endospermbildung. 178 pp. Inaugural Diss. Uppsala.

  • Tarnavschi, I. T. 1935. Studii caryo-sistematice la genulPulmonaria L., cu accentuarea morfologiei chromosomilor si a meiosei. Bull. Fac. Sti. Cernauti9: 47–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, G. 1927. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae4: 1–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1931. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae7: 109–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1935. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae11: 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1936. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae12: 57–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1938. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae16: 162–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmke, H. E. 1941. A section-smear method for plant cytology. Stain Tech.16: 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernham, H. F. 1911. Floral evolution with particular reference to the sympetalous dicotyledons. New Phytol.10: 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. O. 1937. A monograph of the genusMertensia in North America. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.24: 17–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. C. 1948. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winge, O. 1917. Studier over Planterigets Chromosomtal og Chromosomernes Betudning. Diss. Kopenhagen.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Blandy Experimental Farm, Boyce, Virginia

    Donald M. Britton

Authors
  1. Donald M. Britton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Britton, D.M. Cytogenetic studies on the boraginaceae. Brittonia 7, 233–266 (1951). https://doi.org/10.2307/2804694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2804694

Keywords

Search

Navigation