Demography

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 313–321 | Cite as

Does female circumcision affect infertility and fertility? A study of the central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, and Tanzania

Abstract

This study explores the association between female circumcision and infertility and fertility, using information from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). In Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania, circumcised women had lower childlessness, lower infertility by age, and higher total fertility rates than women who were not circumcised; the reverse pattern prevailed in the Central African Republic. In all three countries, however, circumcised women grouped by age at circumcision did not have significantly different odds of infertility nor of having a child than did uncircumcised women, when the effects of covariates were controlled. Thus we find evidence suggesting that the practice of female circumcision does not have a statistically discernible effect on women’s ability to reproduce.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, P.D. 1995. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Carr, D. 1997. Female Genital Cutting: Findings From the Demographic and Health Surveys Program. Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Côte d’Ivoire Enquête Demographique et de Santé 1994. 1995. Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 1995. 1996. Calverton, MD: National Population Council and Demographic and Health Surveys Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Egyptian Fertility Care Society. 1996. “Clinic-Based Investigation of the Typology and Self-Reporting of FGM in Egypt, Final Report.” Presented at a Rainbo workshop on female genital mutilation, November, Cairo.Google Scholar
  6. Larsen, U. 1994. “Sterility in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Population Studies 48:459–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Larsen, U. and J. Menken. 1989. “Measuring Sterility From Incomplete Birth Histories.” Demography 26:185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1991. “Individual-Level Sterility: A New Method of Estimation With Application to Sub-Saharan Africa.” Demography 28:229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Newell, C. 1988. Methods and Models in Demography. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  10. Obermeyer, C.M. and R.F. Reynolds. 1999. “Female Genital Surgeries: The Known, the Unknown, and the Unknowable.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 13:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Republique Centrafricaine Enquête Demographique et de Santé 1994–1995. 1995. Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Sherris, J.D. and G. Fox. 1983. “Infertility and Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Public Health Challenge.” Population Reports, Series L: Issues in World Health 4:L113–51.Google Scholar
  13. Sudan Demographic and Health Survey, 1989–1990. 1991. Columbia, MD: Demographic and Health Surveys Institute for Resource Development/Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey, 1996. 1997. Calverton, MD: Macro International, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Toubia, N. 1993. Female Genital Mutilation: A Call for Global Action. New York: Women, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Toubia, N.. 1994. “Female Circumcision as a Public Health Issue.” New England Journal of Medicine 331:712–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Toubia, N.. 1998. “Female Circumcision/Female Genital Mutilation.” African Journal of Reproductive Health 2:6–8.Google Scholar
  18. UNICEF. 1994. Guidelines for UNICEF Action on Eliminating Female Genital Mutilation. CF/EXD/1994-009.Google Scholar
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). 1993. Press release WHO/10.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1996. Female Genital Mutilation: Report of a WHO Technical Working Group. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Population and International HealthHarvard School of Public HealthBoston
  2. 2.Center for Drug Evaluation and ResearchFood and Drug AdministrationUSA

Personalised recommendations