Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 429–442 | Cite as

Migration and premarital childbearing among Puerto Rican women

  • Nancy S. LandaleEmail author
  • Susan M. Hauan
Determinants and Consequences of Migration

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between migration and premarital childbearing in a highly migratory Latino subgroup, Puerto Rican women. Using pooled origin-destination data from surveys conducted in Puerto Rico and in the New York metropolitan area, we find that first- and second-generation migrants to the u.s. mainland face substantially higher risks of conceiving and bearing a first child before marriage than do nonmigrants in Puerto Rico. This pattern is due largely to the relatively early transition to sexual activity among mainland women. Given the negative long-term consequences of premarital childbearing for women and their children, our findings call into question the assumption that migrants necessarily experience only positive outcomes as a result of the assimilation process.

Keywords

Premarital Birth Puerto Rican Woman Premarital Pregnancy Premarital Conception York Metropolitan Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bean,F.D. and R.R. Berg. 1991. “Cultureand Structural Assimilation and Marital Disruption among Mexican Americans.” Working Paper 13.08, Texas Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  2. Bean, F.D., R.M. Cullen, E.H. Stephen, and G. Swicegood. 1984. “Generational Differences in Fertility among Mexican Americans: Implications for Assessing the Effects of Immigration.” Social Science Quarterly 65:573–82.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, F.D. and G. Swicegood. 1985. Mexican American Fertility Patterns. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bean, F.D., G. Swicegood, and B. Linsley. 1981. “Patterns of Fertility Variation among Mexican Immigrants in the United States.” Pp. 369–440 in U.S. Immigration Policy and National Interest, Staff Report, Appendix D. Washington, DC: Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Bean, F.D. and M. Tienda. 1987. The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Billy, J.O.G., K.L. Brewster, and W.R. Grady. 1994. “Contextual Effects on the Sexual Behavior of Adolescent Women.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 56:387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouvier, L.F. and R.W. Gardner. 1986. “Immigration to the U.S.: The Unfinished Story.” Population Bulletin 41(4):3–50.Google Scholar
  8. Brewster, K.L. 1994. “Race Differences in Sexual Activity among Adolescent Women.” American Sociological Review 59:408–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpass, U. and S. McLanahan. 1989. “Unmarried Motherhood: Recent Trends, Composition, and Black-White Differences.” Demography 26:279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson, E.D. 1985. “The Impact of International Migration upon the Timing of Marriage and Childbearing.” Demography 22:61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapa, J. 1990. “The Myth of Hispanic Progress.” Journal of Hispanic Policy 4:3–18.Google Scholar
  12. Ford, K. 1990. “Duration of Residence in the United States and the Fertility of U.S. Immigrants.” International Migration Review 24:34–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forste, R. and M. Tienda. Forthcoming. “What’s Behind Racial and Ethnic Fertility Patterns.” Population and Development Review.Google Scholar
  14. Gans, H.J. 1992. “Second-Generation Decline: Scenarios for the Economic and Ethnic Futures of Post-1965 American Immigrants.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 15:173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glazer, N. 1993. “Is Assimilation Dead?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 530:122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldscheider, F.K. and L.J. Waite. 1986. “Sex Differences in. the Entry into Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology 92:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gordon, M.M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hanson, S.L., D.E. Myers, and A.L. Ginsburg. 1987. “The Role of Responsibility and Knowledge in Reducing Teenage Out-of Wedlock Childbearing.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayward, M.D., W.R. Grady, and J.O.G. Billy. 1992. “The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Adolescent Pregnancy.” Social Science Quarterly 73:750–72.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschman, C. 1983. “America’s Melting Pot Reconsidered.” Annual Review of Sociology 9:397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofferth, S.L., J.R. Kahn, and W. Baldwin. 1987. “Premarital Sexual Activity among U.S. Teenage Women over the Past Three Decades.” Family Planning Perspectives 19:46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hofferth, S.L. 1987. “Influences on Early Sexual and Fertility Behavior.” Pp. 7–35 in Risking the Future: Adolescent Sexuality, Pregnancy, and Childbearing, edited by S.L. Hofferth and C.D. Hayes. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hogan, D. and E. Kitagawa. 1985. “The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhood on the Fertility of Black Adolescents.” American Journal of Sociology 90:825–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn, J.R. 1988. “Immigrant Selectivity and Fertility Adaptation in the United States.” Social Forces 67:108–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahn, J.R. 1991. “Immigrant and Native Fertility in the U.S. during the 1980s.” Presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Landale, N.S. 1994. “Migration and the Latino Family: The Union Formation Behavior of Puerto Rican Women.” Demography 31:133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landale, N.S. and S.M. Hauan. 1992. “The Family Life Course of Puerto Rican Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:912–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landale, N.S. and N.B. Ogena. 1995. “Migration and Union Dissolution among Puerto Rican Women.” International Migration Review 29(3):671–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lieberson, S. 1980. A Piece of the Pie: Black and White Immigrants since 1880. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Manning, W.D. and N.S. Landale. 1996. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Role of Cohabitation in Premarital Childbearing.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Massey, D.S., J. Arrango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, and J.E. Taylor. 1994. “An Evaluation of International Migration Theory: The North American Case.” Population and Development Review 20:699–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Massey, D.S. and B. Bitterman. 1985. “Explaining the Paradox of Puerto Rican Segregation.” Social Forces 64:306–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michael, R.T. and N.B. Tuma. 1985. “Entry into Marriage and Parenthood by Young Men and Women: The Influence of Family Background.” Demography 22:515–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nathanson, C.A. and Y.J. Kim. 1989. “Components of Change in Adolescent Fertility, 1971–79.” Demography 26:85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. National Center for Health Statistics. 1990. Vital Statistics of the United States, 1988. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  36. —.1993. “Advance Report of Final Natality Statistics, 1990.” Monthly Vital Statistics Report 41(9). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. Oropesa, R.S., D.T. Lichter, and R. Anderson. 1994. “The Paradox of Mexican-American Nuptiality.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 56:889–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Park, R.E. 1950. Race and Culture. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  39. Portes, A. and R.G. Rumbaut. 1990. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Portes, A. and M. Zhou. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 530:74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, J.P. 1988. “Poverty and the Family.” Pp. 141–78 in Divided Opportunities: Minorities, Poverty, and Social Policy, edited by G.D. Sandefur and M. Tienda. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Stephen, E.H. 1989. At the Crossroads: Fertility of Mexican-American Women. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  43. Stephen, E.H. and F.D. Bean. 1992. “Assimilation, Disruption and the Fertility of Mexican-Origin Women in the United States.” International Migration Review 26:67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swicegood, G. and S.P. Morgan. 1994. “Racial and Ethnic Fertility Differentials in the United States.” Prepared for the 13th Albany Conference: “American Diversity: A Demographic Challenge for the Twenty-First Century,” SUNY Albany.Google Scholar
  45. Teachman, J.D. and K.A. Polonko. 1985. “Timing of the Transition to Parenthood: A Multidimensional Birth-Interval Approach.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:867–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thornton, A. 1995. “Attitudes, Values and Norms Related to Nonmarital Fertility.” Pp. 210–16 in Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1991. The Hispanic Population in the United States: March 1991. Current Population Reports P-20, No. 455. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. Vasquez Calzada, J.L. 1988. La Población de Puerto Rico y su Trayectoria Histórica. Rio Piedras, PR: Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
  49. Yamaguchi, K. 1991. Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Yamaguchi, K. and D. Kandel. 1987. “Drug Use and Other Determinants of Premarital Pregnancy and Its Outcome: A Dynamic Analysis of Competing Life Events.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:257–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Research InstituteThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park
  2. 2.Institute for Research on PovertyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations