Age at last birth and its components

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which the behavior of twentieth century cohorts of American women changed simultaneously in the three components of fertility that determine age at last birth—age at first birth, spacing between subsequent births, and parity progression ratios of subsequent births—to produce changes in the timing of the completion of childbearing. It decomposes changes in the mean age at last birth among cohorts and between whites and nonwhites to changes in these three components. To perform these analyses, we developed and applied a method to estimate the distributions and means of ages at first and last births, birth intervals, and parity progression ratios from age- and parity-specific fertility rates available from vital statistics data. Results show that the cohorts increased and decreased their age at first birth, birth intervals, and parity progression ratios of lower and higher birth orders in almost every possible combination so as to achieve a relatively young age at final birth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anderton, Douglas L. 1989. “Comment on Knodel’s ‘Starting, Stopping and Spacing during the Early Stages of Fertility Transition.’” Demography 26(3):467–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bongaarts, John and Robert G. Potter. 1983. Fertility, Biology and Behavior: An Analysis of the Proximate Determinants. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Das Gupta, Prithwis. 1985. “Future Fertility of Women by Present Age and Parity: Analysis of American Historical Data, 1917–1980.” Current Population Report Series P23, Special Studies (142):1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. 1991. “Decomposition of the Difference between Two Rates and Its Consistency When More Than Two Populations Are Involved.” Mathematical Population Studies 3(2):105–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Das Gupta, Prithwis and John F. Long. 1985. “Ultimate Parity Distribution and Mean Age at Childbearing by Birth Order for American Women: 1917–1980.” Proceedings of IUSSP International Population Conference 4:219–28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Day, Lincoln H. 1958. “Age of Women at Completion of Childbearing,” Public Health Reports, 73(6):525–31.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Day, Lincoln H. 1986. “The Age of Women at Completion of Childbearing: Australian Differentials by Religion and Country of Birth.” Population Studies 40:237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fallo-Mitchell, Linda and Carol D. Ryff. 1982. “Preferred Timing of Female Life Events.” Research on Aging 4(2):249–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Glick, Paul C. and Robert Parke. 1965. “New Approaches in Studying the Life Cycle of the Family.” Demography 2:187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heuser, Robert L. 1976. Fertility Tables for Birth Control by Color: United States, 1917–1973. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Home, A. Dale, Mohammed EI-Khorazaty, and C.M. Suchindran. 1990. “Statistical Modeling of Selected Aspects of the Childbearing Process with Application to World Fertility Survey Countries.” Mathematical Population Studies 2:183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Knodel, John. 1987. “Starting, Stopping, and Spacing during the Early Stages of Fertility Transition: The Experience of German Village Populations in the 18th and 19th Centuries.” Demography 24:143–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koo, Helen P., C.M. Suchindran, and Janet D. Griffith. 1987. “The Completion of Childbearing: Change and Variation in Timing.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 49:281–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McDonald, Peter. 1984. Nuptiality and Completed Fertility: A Study of Starting, Stopping and Spacing Behavior. Voorbug, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McDonald, Peter and John Knodel. 1989. “The Impact of Changes in Birth Spacing on Age at Last Birth: A Response to Anderton.” Demography 26(3):471–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pandey, Arvind and C.M. Suchindran. 1988. “Modeling Fertility with Mortality as a Competing Risk: An Application.” Proceedings of the General Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section:127–33.

  17. Rindfuss, Ronald R. and Larry L. Bumpass. 1976. “How Old Is Too Old? Age and the Sociology of Fertility.” Family Planning Perspectives 8(5):226–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryder, Norman B. 1969. “The Emergence of a Modem Fertility Pattern: United States 1917–66.” Pp. 99–123 in Fertility and Family Planning, edited by J.J. Behrman, Leslie Corsa Jr., and Ronald Freedman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. — 1979. “Components of Temporal Variations in American Fertility.” pp. 15–54 in Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, edited by R.W. Horns. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  20. — 1986. “Observations on the History of Cohort Fertility in the United States.” Population and Development Review 12(4):617–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheps, Mindel C. and Jane A. Menken. 1973. Mathematical Models of Conception and Birth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spanier, Graham B. and Paul C. Glick. 1980. “The Life Cycle of American Families: An Expanded Analysis.” Journal of Family History 51:97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stein, Zena A. 1985. “A Woman’s Age: Childbearing and Child Rearing.” American Journal of Epidemiology 121(3):327–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Suchindran.

Additional information

The research reported here was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Grant ROI-HDI8413. We gratefully acknowledge the secretarial assistance of Debra Harris and Lori Hill, the research assistance of Ali Mokdad, John Feaganes, and Susan Settergren, and the suggestions of anonymous referees and the editors of Demography.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suchindran, C.M., Koo, H.P. Age at last birth and its components. Demography 29, 227–245 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061729

Download citation

Keywords

  • Birth Order
  • Current Population Survey
  • Birth Interval
  • Subsequent Birth
  • High Birth Order