Skip to main content

Determinants of short- and long-term mobility expectations for home owners and renters

Abstract

Confusion about the role of residential satisfaction vis-a-vis structural factors in the mobility process stems from the failure to examine the determinants of mobility over varying time frames and housing tenures. Using survey data for a random sample of 580 Phoenix-area households, we test models of short-term (l year) and long-term (5 years) mobility expectations for home owners and renters. The results show that residential satisfaction mediates the effects of structural variables on mobility expectations in the short term for home owners. In the long-term model for home owners and the short-term model for renters, the role of satisfaction as an intervening force declines in relative importance. Among renters, structural variables operate directly on long-term mobility expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Asher, H. B. (1976). Causal Modeling, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 3. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizona Dept. of Economic Security. (1986). Special Population Censusof Maricopa County: October 1, 1985. Phoenix: State Data Center, Arizona Dept. of Economic Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, R. L., & Smith, J. (1977). “Community Satisfaction, Expectations of Moving, and Migration.” Demography, 14, 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V. (1983). “Recent Research on Migration and Mobility: A Review and Interpretation.” Progress in Planning, 18, 1–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. V.; & Onaka, J. L. (1983). “Life Cycle and Housing Adjustment as Explanations of Residential Mobility.” Urban Studies, 20, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ColeDirectory for Phoenix and Suburbs. (1987). Phoenix: Cole.

  • Desbarats, J. (1983). “Spatial Choice and Constraints on Behavior.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73, 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1983). “Mail and Other Self-Administered Questionnaires.” In Handbook of Survey Research, eds. P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulf, J. O., & Clark, W. A. V. (1978). “Cumulative Stress and Cumulative Inertia: A Behavioral Model of the Decision to Move.” Environment and Planning, Ser. A, 10, 1101–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendig, H. L. (1984). “Housing Careers, Life Cycle, and Residential Mobility: Implications for the Housing Market.” Urban Studies, 21, 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N. S., & Guest, A. (1985). “Constraints, Satisfaction and Residential Mobility: Speare’s Model Reconsidered”. Demography, 22, 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A. (1978). “Residential Mobility on Skid Row: Disaffiliation, Powerlessness, and Decision-Making.” Demography, 15, 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K. E. (1984). “Explaining Migration Intentions and Destination Selection.” Professional Geographer, 36, 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. G. (1986). “Mobility Intention and Subsequent Relocation.” Urban Geography, 7, 497–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. G., & Clark, W. A. V. (1986). “Stable Structure and Local Variation: A Comparison of Household Flows in Four Metropolitan Areas.” Urban Studies, 23, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. J., & Duncan, G. J. (1979). “Residential Problems, Dissatisfaction, and Mobility.” Journal of the American Planning Association, 45, 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell, R. R., & De Jong, G. F. (1983). “Deciding Whether to Move: Mobility, Wishful Thinking, and Adjustment.” Sociology and Social Research, 67, 146–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A. (1974). “Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility.” Demography, 11, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Kobrin, F., & Kingkade, W. (1982). “The Influence of Socioeconomic Bonds and Satisfaction on Interstate Migration.” Social Forces, 61, 551–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. (1975). Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternlieb, G., & Hughes, J. W. (1986). “Demographics and Housing in America.” Population Bulletin, 41(1), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1965). “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McHugh, K.E., Gober, P. & Reid, N. Determinants of short- and long-term mobility expectations for home owners and renters. Demography 27, 81–95 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061554

Keywords

  • Structural Variable
  • Household Size
  • Path Coefficient
  • Path Model
  • Home Owner