Skip to main content
Log in

Mobility and adjustments: Paths to the resolution of residential stress

  • Mobility, Migration, and Immigration
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

In theory, residential mobility is a response to environmental stress only if households do not reduce dissatisfaction through other alternatives, such as housing improvements or repairs. Despite the attention given to stress-reducing alternatives, however, no attempt has been made to test empirically the residential satisfaction model with adjustments. Using data from the Annual Housing Survey: 1978–1981, I model three stages in the mobility process and investigate potential sources of specification error in previous tests. Blocks of family cycle, background/action state, and location/housing variables are shown to affect adjusting significantly. Residential satisfaction strongly affectsmobility preferences; and all theoretically relevant blocks of explanatory variables predict mobility. Alternatives to mobility should be included in the residential satisfaction model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Lughod, J., & Foley, M. M. (1960). “Consumer strategies.” In Housing Choices and Housing Constraints, eds. N. N. Foote, J. Abu-Lughod, M. M. Foley, & L. Winnick. New York: McGraw-Hili, pp. 71–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, R. L., & Smith, J. (1977). “Community Satisfaction, Expectations of Moving, and Migration.” Demography, 14, 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassare, M. (1986). “Residential Satisfaction and the Community Question.” Social Science Review, 70, 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. K., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. A., & Moore, K. G. (1970). “The Intra-urban Migration Process: A Perspective.” General Systems, 15, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. v., & Cadwallader, M. (1973). “Locational Stress and Residential Mobility.” Environment and Behavior, 5, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. v., & Huf, J. O. (1977). “Some Empirical Tests of Duration-of-Stay Elects in Intraurban Migration.” Environment and Planning, Ser. A, 9, 1357–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R. (1982). “Housing Tenure and Neighborhood Activism.” Urban Affairs Quarterly, 18, 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1963). “The Theory of Change and Response in Modern Demographic History.” Population Index, 29, 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (1984). LinearStatistical Models and Related Methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetze, R. (1983). Rescuing the American Dream. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golant, S. M. (1971). “Adjustment Process in a System: A Behavioral Model of Human Movement.” Geographical Analysis, 3, 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. (1954). “Repeated Migration as a Factor in High Mobility Rates.” American Sociological Review, 19, 536–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1958). Patterns of Mobility, 1910–1950. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1964). “The Extent of Repeated Migration: An Analysis Based on the Danish Population Register.” Tournai of the American Statistical Association, 59, 1121–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huf, J. O., & Clark, W. A. V. (1978). “Cumulative Stress and Cumulative Inertia: A Behavioral Model of the Decision to Move.” Environment and Planning, Ser. A, 10, 1101–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C. (1969). “Duration of Residence and Prospective Migration: Further Evidence.” Demography, 6, 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N. S., & Guest, A. M. (1985). “Constraints, Satisfaction and Residential Mobility: Speare’s Model Reconsidered.” Demography, 22, 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., & Guest, A. M. (1983). “Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: A Metropolitan-Level Analysis.” Sociological Quarterly, 24, 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. S. (1966). “A Theory of Migration.” Demography, 3, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, R. (1968). “A Stochastic Model of Social Mobility.” American Sociological Review, 23, 712–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, P. A. (1967). “Duration of Residence and Prospective Migration: The Evaluation of a Stochastic Model”. Demography, 4, 553–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1971). “Chronic Movers and the Future Redistribution of Population: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Demography, 8, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1972). “Population Movements and the Shape of Urban Growth: Implications for Public Policy.” Technical Report R-I072-CPG. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G., McGinnis, R., & Masnick, G. (1967). “The Duration of Residence Approach to a Dynamic Stochastic Model ofInternal Migration: A Test of the Axiom of Cumulative Inertia. Eugenics Quarterly, 14, 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, G., & Duncan, S. (1979). “Residential Problems, Dissatisfaction, and Mobility.” Tournai of the American Planning Association, 45, 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priemus, H. (1986). “Housing as a Social Adaptation Process.” Environment and Behavior, 18, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H. (1980). Why Families Move. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Originally published 1955.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr. (1970). “Home Ownership, Life Cycle Stage, and Residential Mobility.” Demography, 7, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1974). “Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility.” Demography, 11, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr., Goldstein, S., & Frey, W. H. (1975). Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumka, H.. (1987). “Creative Reuse of the Existing Stock.” In Housing America’s Poor, ed. P. D. Salins. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 111–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thernstrom, S., & Knights, P. R. (1970). “Men in Motion: Some Data and Speculations About Urban Population Mobility in Nineteenth-Century America.” Tournai ofInterdisciplinary History, 1, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1986). Geographic Mobility: March 1983 to March 1984, Current Population Reports, Ser. P-20, No. 407. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development. (1983). Annual Housing Survey, 1981: National Core and Supplement File [Machine-readable data file]. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census (Producer and Distributor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1965). “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. (1966). “Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress.” Tournai of Sociallssues, 22, 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deane, G.D. Mobility and adjustments: Paths to the resolution of residential stress. Demography 27, 65–79 (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061553

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061553

Keywords

Navigation