Anderton, D. L., and L. L. Bean. 1985. Birth spacing and fertility limitation: A behavioral analysis of a nineteenth century population. Demography 22:169–183.
Article
Google Scholar
Coale, A. J., M. John, and T. Richards. 1985. Calculation of age-specific fertility schedules from tabulations of parity in two censuses. Demography 22:611–623.
Article
Google Scholar
Coale, A. J., and N. W. Rives, Jr. 1973. A statistical reconstruction of the black population of the United States, 1880–1970: Estimates of true numbers by age and sex, birth rates, and total fertility. Population Index 39:3–36.
Article
Google Scholar
Coale, A. J., and T. J. Trussell. 1974. Model fertility schedules: Variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Population Index 40:185–258.
Article
Google Scholar
— 1978. Technical note: Finding the two parameters that specify a model schedule of marital fertility. Population Index 44:203–213.
Article
Google Scholar
Coale, A. J., and M. Zelnik. 1963. New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States: A Study of Annual White Births From 1855 to I960 and of Completeness of Enumeration in the Censuses From 1880 to 1960. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
David, P. A., and W. C. Sanderson. 1986. Rudimentary contraceptive methods and the American transition to marital fertility control, 1855–1915. Pp. 307–379 in R. Gallman and S. Engerman (eds.), Long Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
— 1987. The emergence of a two-child norm among American birth controllers. Population and Development Review 13:1–41.
Article
Google Scholar
Eblen, J. E. 1974. New estimates of the vital rates of the United States black population during the nineteenth century. Demography 11:301–319.
Article
Google Scholar
Farley, R. 1965. The demographic rates and social institutions of the nineteenth-century negro population: A stable population analysis. Demography 2:386–398.
Article
Google Scholar
Fogel, R. W. 1984. Nutrition and the Decline in Mortality Since 1700: Some Preliminary Findings, Working Paper No. 1402 (July). Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Google Scholar
Glover, J. W. 1921. United States Life Tables: 1890, 1901, 1910, and 1901-10. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
Grabill, W. H., and L. J. Cho. 1965. Methodology for the measurement of current fertility from population data on young children. Demography 2:50–73.
Article
Google Scholar
Grove, R. D., and A. M. Hetzel. 1968. Vital Statistics Rates in the United States, 1940–1960. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
Haines, M. R. 1979. The use of model life tables to estimate mortality for the United States in the late nineteenth century. Demography 16:289–312.
Article
Google Scholar
Keyfitz, N., and W. Flieger. 1968. World Population: An Analysis of Vital Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Meeker, E. 1977. Freedom, economic opportunity, and fertility: Black Americans, 1860–1910. Economic Inquiry 15:397–412.
Article
Google Scholar
Mosk, C. 1983. Patriarchy and Fertility: Japan and Sweden, 1880–1960. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Public Health Service. 1984. Vital Statistics of the United States (Vol. 1): Natality. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
Preston, S. H., and M. R. Haines. 1984. New estimates of child mortality in the United States at the turn of the century. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:272–281.
Article
Google Scholar
Ryder, N. B., and C. F. Westoff. 1971. Reproduction in the United States: 1965. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Sanderson, W. C. 1979. Quantitative aspects of marriage, fertility and family limitation in nineteenth century America: Another application of the Coale specification. Demography 16:339–358.
Article
Google Scholar
Taeuber, C, and I. B. Taeuber. 1958. The Changing Population of the United States. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Thompson, W. S., and P. K. Whelpton. 1933. Population Trends in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Tolnay, S. E. 1981. Trends in total and marital fertility for black Americans, 1886–1899. Demography 18:443–463.
Article
Google Scholar
Tolnay, S. E., S. N. Graham, and A. M. Guest. 1982. Own-child estimates of U.S. white fertility, 1886-99. Historical Methods 15:127–138.
Google Scholar
Trussell, J. 1979. Natural fertility: Measurement and use in fertility models. Pp. 29–64 in H. Leridon and J. Menken (eds.), Natural Fertility. Liege: Ordina Editions.
Google Scholar
United Nations. 1983. Indirect Techniques for Demographic Estimation (Manual 10). New York: United Nations.
Google Scholar
—. 1943. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Fertility for States and Large Cities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
—. 1944. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Standardized Fertility Rates and Reproduction Rates. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
—. 1945a. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Women by Number of Children Ever Born. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
—. 1945b. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Women by Number of Children Under 5 Years Old. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
—. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar
—. 1979. Twenty Censuses: Population and Housing Questions, 1790–1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Google Scholar