Demography

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 137–148 | Cite as

American fertility in transition: New estimates of birth rates in the United States, 1900–1910

  • Michael R. Haines
Article

Abstract

This article presents new estimates of age-specific overall and marital fertility rates for the entire United States for the period 1900‐1910. The estimation techniques are the two-census parity increment method and the own-children method. The data sources are the 1900 census public use sample and tabulations of 1910 census fertility data published with the 1940 census. Estimates are made for the total population, whites, native-born whites, foreign-born whites, and blacks. Low age-specific marital fertility at younger ages is consistent with a view of a distinctive American fertility pattern at this time.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderton, D. L., and L. L. Bean. 1985. Birth spacing and fertility limitation: A behavioral analysis of a nineteenth century population. Demography 22:169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coale, A. J., M. John, and T. Richards. 1985. Calculation of age-specific fertility schedules from tabulations of parity in two censuses. Demography 22:611–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coale, A. J., and N. W. Rives, Jr. 1973. A statistical reconstruction of the black population of the United States, 1880–1970: Estimates of true numbers by age and sex, birth rates, and total fertility. Population Index 39:3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coale, A. J., and T. J. Trussell. 1974. Model fertility schedules: Variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Population Index 40:185–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. — 1978. Technical note: Finding the two parameters that specify a model schedule of marital fertility. Population Index 44:203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coale, A. J., and M. Zelnik. 1963. New Estimates of Fertility and Population in the United States: A Study of Annual White Births From 1855 to I960 and of Completeness of Enumeration in the Censuses From 1880 to 1960. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. David, P. A., and W. C. Sanderson. 1986. Rudimentary contraceptive methods and the American transition to marital fertility control, 1855–1915. Pp. 307–379 in R. Gallman and S. Engerman (eds.), Long Term Factors in American Economic Growth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. — 1987. The emergence of a two-child norm among American birth controllers. Population and Development Review 13:1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eblen, J. E. 1974. New estimates of the vital rates of the United States black population during the nineteenth century. Demography 11:301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farley, R. 1965. The demographic rates and social institutions of the nineteenth-century negro population: A stable population analysis. Demography 2:386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fogel, R. W. 1984. Nutrition and the Decline in Mortality Since 1700: Some Preliminary Findings, Working Paper No. 1402 (July). Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Glover, J. W. 1921. United States Life Tables: 1890, 1901, 1910, and 1901-10. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. Grabill, W. H., and L. J. Cho. 1965. Methodology for the measurement of current fertility from population data on young children. Demography 2:50–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grove, R. D., and A. M. Hetzel. 1968. Vital Statistics Rates in the United States, 1940–1960. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  15. Haines, M. R. 1979. The use of model life tables to estimate mortality for the United States in the late nineteenth century. Demography 16:289–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keyfitz, N., and W. Flieger. 1968. World Population: An Analysis of Vital Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Meeker, E. 1977. Freedom, economic opportunity, and fertility: Black Americans, 1860–1910. Economic Inquiry 15:397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosk, C. 1983. Patriarchy and Fertility: Japan and Sweden, 1880–1960. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. National Center for Health Statistics, U.S. Public Health Service. 1984. Vital Statistics of the United States (Vol. 1): Natality. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  20. Preston, S. H., and M. R. Haines. 1984. New estimates of child mortality in the United States at the turn of the century. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ryder, N. B., and C. F. Westoff. 1971. Reproduction in the United States: 1965. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sanderson, W. C. 1979. Quantitative aspects of marriage, fertility and family limitation in nineteenth century America: Another application of the Coale specification. Demography 16:339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taeuber, C, and I. B. Taeuber. 1958. The Changing Population of the United States. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, W. S., and P. K. Whelpton. 1933. Population Trends in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Tolnay, S. E. 1981. Trends in total and marital fertility for black Americans, 1886–1899. Demography 18:443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tolnay, S. E., S. N. Graham, and A. M. Guest. 1982. Own-child estimates of U.S. white fertility, 1886-99. Historical Methods 15:127–138.Google Scholar
  27. Trussell, J. 1979. Natural fertility: Measurement and use in fertility models. Pp. 29–64 in H. Leridon and J. Menken (eds.), Natural Fertility. Liege: Ordina Editions.Google Scholar
  28. United Nations. 1983. Indirect Techniques for Demographic Estimation (Manual 10). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  29. —. 1943. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Fertility for States and Large Cities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. —. 1944. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Standardized Fertility Rates and Reproduction Rates. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. —. 1945a. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Women by Number of Children Ever Born. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  32. —. 1945b. Sixteenth Census of the United States, 1940. Population. Differential Fertility, 1940 and 1910: Women by Number of Children Under 5 Years Old. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  33. —. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  34. —. 1979. Twenty Censuses: Population and Housing Questions, 1790–1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael R. Haines
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWayne State UniversityDetroit

Personalised recommendations