Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Employment trends ofyoung mothers and the opportunity cost of babies in the United States

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

The central concept of microeconomic theories of fertility is opportunity cost—the product of wife’s employment lost due to childbearing and the value of her employment. This paper presents a model for analyzing opportunity cost using panel data. The average loss of employment attributable to a second- or higher-order birth, calculated at around age 2, is over 400 hours per year. This time cost represents an income loss of about $1050 in 1969 dollars. Time cost is independent of such demographic factors as birth order and age of oldest sibling. Neither does time cost depend on husband’s wage rate or wife’s education or potential wage rate. This indicates that many microeconomic models of fertility have been seriously misspecified. The paper also compares results from static and dynamic models, explores possible problems due to simultaneity bias, investigates the relationship between changes in employment (including time cost) and initial employment level, and identifies the difficulties of theorizing about opportunity cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahr, S. J. 1974. Effects on Power and Division of Labor in the Family. Pp.167–185 in Lois W. Hoffman and F. I. Nye (eds.), Working Mothers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1975. Human Capital. (Second edition.) New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. 1976. Social Science Research on Population: A Review. Population and Development Review 2:219–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, William G., and T. Aldrich Finegan. 1969. The Economics of Labor Force Participation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, G. 1971. Issues in the Economics of a Population Policy for the United States. American Economic Review 61:408–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and A. Weininger. 1973. Economic Determinants of Fertility: Results from Cross-Sectional Aggregate Data. Demography 10:205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1968. The Mathematical Study of Change. Pp.428–478 in Hubert M. Blalock and Anne Blalock (eds.), Methodology in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tray, D. N. 1973. Child Quality and the Demand for Children. Journal of Political Economy 81:S70-S95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, Jonathan. 1974a. Labor Supply of Family Members. Pp.177–250 in James N. Morgan (ed.), Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. 1. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1974b. Categorical Interactions in Linear Regression Models. Pp.365–374 in James N. Morgan (ed.), Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, Vol. 1.Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Ruth B. 1975. Women’s Rights and Fertility. Reports on Population/Family Planning No. 17. New York: The Population Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. 1969. Towards a Socioeconomic Theory of Fertility: A Survey of Recent Research on Economic Factors in American Fertility. Pp. 127–156 in S. J. Behrman, Leslie Corsa, and Ronald Freedman (eds.), Fertility and Family Planning: A World View. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghez, Gilbert R., and G. S. Becker. 1975. The Allocation of Time and Goods Over the Life Cycle. New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Chester W. 1963. Problems in Measuring Change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorn, Geoffrey. 1970. The Sociology of Fertility. London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. 1974. Problems of Statistical Estimation and Causal Inference in Time Series Regression Models. Pp,252–308 in Herbert L. Costner (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1973–74. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. R., and F. P. Stafford. 1974. Allocation of Time to Pre-school Children and Educational Opportunity. Journal of Human Resources 9:323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M. 1977. A Cautionary Note on the Use of Two-Stage Least Squares. Sociological Methods and Research 5:335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, John B., and James N. Morgan. 1971. Economic Survey Methods. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. 1974. An Interpretation of the Economic Theory of Fertility: Promising Path or Blind Alley? Journal of Economic Literature 12:457–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. T. 1973. Education and the Derived Demand for Children. Journal of Political Economy 81:S128-S164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, James N., Katherine Dickinson, Jonathan Dickinson, Jacob Benus, and Greg Duncan. 1974. Five Thousand American Families: Patterns of Economic Progress, Vols. 1 and 2. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, N. K. 1972. Some Observations on the Economic Framework for Fertility Analysis. Population Studies 26:185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1974. Which Couples at Given Parities Expect to Have Additional Births? An Exercise in Discriminant Analysis. Demography 11:45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M. 1974. Household and Economy: Toward a New Theory of Population and Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 82:S200-S218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade. 1970. The Female Labor Force in the United States. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, Potluri, and Roger L. Miller. 1971. Applied Econometrics. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, Norman B., and Charles F. Westoff. 1971. Reproduction in the United States, 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, John. 1972. Sexual Bargaining: Power Politics in the American Marriage. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. P. 1973. A Preliminary Survey of Economic Analyses of Fertility. American Economic Review 63:71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. 1966. Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science. Pp.1–28 in American Economic Association and Royal Economic Society, Surveys of Economic Theory, Vol. III: Resource Allocation. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. A. 1972. Labor Force Reentry by Mothers of Young Children. Social Science Research 1:189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973. Women in the Labor Force. New York: Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchi, Boone A. 1975a. The Demand for Children: The Economics of Fertility in the United States. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1975b. Microeconomic Theories of Fertility: A Critique. Social Forces 54:107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, R. J. 1973. A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior. Journal of Political Economy 81:S14-S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of California, 95616, Davis, California

    James C. Cramer

Authors
  1. James C. Cramer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cramer, J.C. Employment trends ofyoung mothers and the opportunity cost of babies in the United States. Demography 16, 177–197 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061137

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061137

Keywords

Search

Navigation