Abstract
Recent research has suggested that the position of many urban migrants compares favorably with that of urban natives. This generalization is refined by referring to three key distinctions: migrants from rural versus urban origins, recent versus more experienced cityward migrants, and type of urban destination. In Thailand in the early 1970s, migrants to smaller urban centers, especially the more experienced migrants, are economically more successful than migrants to the large metropolitan centers and in some cases are more successful than urban natives. Reasons for this pattern are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, Frank M., James N. Morgan, John A. Sonquist, and Laura Klem. 1973. Multiple Classification Analysis: A Report on a Computer Program for Multiple Regression Using Categorical Predictors. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research.
Balan, Jorge. 1969. Migrant-Native Socioeconomic Differences in Latin American Cities: A Structural Analysis. Latin American Research Review 4:3–29.
Browning, Harley, 1971. Migrant Selectivity and the Growth of Large Cities in Developing Societies. National Academy of Sciences (eds.), Rapid Population Growth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goldstein, Sidney and Alice Goldstein. 1978. Thailand’s Urban Population Reconsidered. Demography 15:239–258.
Goldstein, Sidney and Pichit Pitaktepsombati. 1974. Migration and Urban Growth in Thailand: An Exploration of Interrelationships Among Origin, Recency and Frequency of Moves. Paper No. 14 (August). Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
Goldstein, Sidney, Visid Prachuabmoh, and Alice Goldstein. 1974. Urban-Rural Migration Differentials in Thailand. Research Report No. 12 (February). Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
Goodman, Leo. 1973. Causal Analysis of Data from Panel Studies and Other Kinds of Surveys. American Journal of Sociology 65:1135–1191.
Hagen, Everett E. 1961. On the Theory of Social Change: How Economic Growth Begins. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.
Institute of Population Studies. 1971. The Methodology of the Longitudinal Study of Social, Economic, and Demographic Change. Research Report No. 6 (December). Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
Kish, L., R. M. Groves, and K. P. Krotki. 1976. Sampling Errors for Fertility Surveys. Occasional Paper No. 17. The Hague: World Fertility Study, International Statistical Institute.
McClelland, David C. 1961. The Achieving Society. New York: Van Nostrand.
Nelson, Joan. 1969. Migrants, Urban Poverty and Instability in Developing Nations. Occasional Paper No. 22. Cambridge, Mass.: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
Prachuabmoh, Visid, John Knodel, Suchart Prasithrathsin and Nibhon Debavalya. 1972. The Rural and Urban Populations of Thailand: Comparative Profiles. Research Report No. 8 (December). Bangkok: Institute of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
Sternstein, L. 1975. Chain Migration to the Primate City: The Case of Bangkok. Journal of Tropical Geography 41:70–74.
Tirasawat, Penporn. 1978. Economic and Housing Adjustment of Migrants in Greater Bangkok. International Migration Review 12:93–103.
Todaro, Michael P. 1976. Rural-Urban Migration, Unemployment and Job Probabilities: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Research. Pp. 367–385 in Ansley J. Coale (ed), Economic Factors in Population Growth. London: Macmillan.
Treiman, Donald. 1977. Occupational Prestige in Comparative Perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Yap, Lorene. 1975. Internal Migration in Less Developed Countries: A Survey of the Literature. Bank Staff Working Paper No. 215. Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuller, T.D. Migrant-native socioeconomic differentials in Thailand. Demography 18, 55–66 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061049
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061049