Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 141–155 | Cite as

Long-term economic consequences for women of delayed childbearing and reduced family size

  • Sandra L. Hofferth
Article

Abstract

Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, this study explored the association among delayed childbearing, completed family size and several measures of the economic well-being of women age 60 and older in 1976. By retirement age women who bore their first child at age 30 or older are significantly better off economically than either average-age childbearers or the childless. Economic well-being also appears to be related to family size among late childbearers. At retirement age the delayed childbearer with only one or two children appears better off than all other women. Thus, late childbearing and small family size appear associated with the highest standard of living for these women. This study also relates the experience of this early cohort of women to that of more recent birth cohorts.

Keywords

Family Income Family Size Labor Force Participation Transfer Income High Family Income 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P. and M. F. Van Loo. 1978. Fertility as Consumption: Theories from the Behavioral Sciences. Journal of Consumer Research 4:199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowles, S. and H. Gintis. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bulatao, R. A. 1981. Values and Disvalues of Children in Successive Childbearing Decisions. Demography 18:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duncan, O. D., D. Featherman, and B. Duncan. 1972. Socio-economic Background and Achievement. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  5. Elder, G. H., Jr. 1978. Family History and the Life Course. Pp. 17–64 in Tamara K. Hareven (ed.), Transitions: The Family and the Life Course in Historical Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Espenshade, T. J. 1977. The Value and Cost of Children. Population Bulletin 32(1).Google Scholar
  7. — 1980. Raising a Child Can Now Cost $85,000. Intercom 8(9):1, 10–12.Google Scholar
  8. Glick, P. C. 1977. Updating the Life Cylce of the Family. Journal of Marriage and the Family 39:5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grad, S. and K. Foster. 1979. Income of the Population, 55 and Over, 1976. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  10. Hout, M. 1978. The Determinants of Marital Fertility in the United States 1968–1970: Inferences from a Dynamic Model. Demography 15:139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Institute for Social Research. 1974. Procedures and Tape Codes, 1974 Interviewing Year. The University of Michigan: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  12. Institute for Social Research. 1976. Procedures and Tape Codes, 1976 Interviewing Year. The University of Michigan: The Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  13. Kohen, A. I. 1973. Determinants of Early Labor Market Success Among Young Men: Race, Ability, Quantity and Quality of School. Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  14. Lazear, E. P. and R. T. Michael. 1980. Family Size and the Distribution of Real Per Capita Income. American Economic Review 70:91–107.Google Scholar
  15. Mincer, J. and H. Ofek. 1982. Interrupted Work Careers: Depreciation and Restoration of Human Capital. Journal of Human Resources 17:324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Namboodiri, N. K. 1972. Some Observations on the Economic Framework for Fertility Analysis. Population Studies 26:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosenzweig, M. R. 1976. Female Work Experience, Employment Status, and Birth Expectations: Sequential Decision-Making in the Philippines. Demography 13:339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, J. P. and M. P. Ward. 1980. Asset Accumulation and Family Size. Demography 17:243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Turchi, B. A. 1975. The Demand for Children: The Economics of Fertility in the United States: Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  20. Veevers, J. E. 1980. Childless by Choice. Toronto, Canada: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  21. Ventura, S. J. 1982. Trends in First Births to Older Mothers, 1970–79. Monthly Vital Statistics Report 31:1–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra L. Hofferth
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Population ResearchNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentUSA

Personalised recommendations