This paper examines biases that may occur when models of couple behavior are estimated using one partner’s report of own and of spouse’s desired family size rather than independent reports obtained from both partners. When estimates of random measurement error are incorporated in a model of couple fertility expectations, proxy reports are valid indicators of spouse desires. In particular, there is little evidence that proxy reports are affected by systematic errors arising from projection of own beliefs onto the spouse. For desired family size, random measurement error in both proxy and self reports is of far greater concern than is systematic error.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Beckman, L. J. 1979. Couples’ decision-making processes regarding fertility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York (September).
Beckman, L. J., R. Aizenberg, A. B. Forsythe, and T. Day. 1983. A theoretical analysis of antecedents of young couples’ fertility decisions. Demography 20:519–533.
Brackbill, Y. 1974. Test-retest reliability in population research. Studies in Family Planning 5:261–266.
Bulatao, R. A. 1981. Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions. Demography 18:1–25.
Byrne, D. and B. Blaylock. 1963. Similarity and assumed similarity of attitudes between husbands and wives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67:636–640.
Coombs, L. C. 1977. Levels of reliability in fertility survey data. Studies in Family Planning 8:218–232.
Fried, E. S. and J. R. Udry, 1979. Wives’ and husbands’ expected costs and benefits of childbearing as predictors of pregnancy. Social Biology 26:265–274.
Fried, E. S., S. L. Hofferth and J. R. Udry. 1980. Parity specific and two-sex utility models of reproductive intentions. Demography 17:1–11.
Hill, R., J. M. Stycos and K. W. Back. 1959. The Family and Population Control: A Puerto Rican Experiment in Social Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
HolIman, L. W., A. Thornton and J. D. Manis. 1978. The value of children to parents in the United States. Journal of Population 1:91–131.
Joreskog, K. G. and D. Sorbom. 1981. Lisrel V: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Methods. Chicago: International Educational Resources.
Levinger, G. and J. Breedlove. 1966. Interpersonal attraction and agreement: A study of marriage partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3:367–372.
Misra, B. D. 1967. Correlates of males’ attitudes toward family planning. Pp. 161–271 in D. J. Bogue (ed.), Sociological Contributions to Family Planning Research. Chicago: Community and Family Study Center, University of Chicago.
Rainwater, L. 1965. Family Design: Marital Sexuality, Family size, and Contraception. Chicago: Aldine.
Spitze, G. and J. Huber. 1982. Accuracy of wife’s perception of husband’s attitude toward her employment. Journal of Marriage and the Family 44:477–481.
Thomson, E. 1983. Individual and couple utility of children. Demography 20:507–518.
Thomson, E. and S. Sprecher. 1982. Perceptions of marital partner’s desire for children. Center for Demography and Ecology Working Paper 82–13, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Thomson, E. and R. Williams. 1982. Beyond wives’ family sociology: a method for analyzing couple data. Journal of Marriage and the Family 44:999–1008.
Thomson, E. 1984. A note on correlated measurement error in wife-husband data. Journal of Marriage and the Family 46 (in press).
Townes, B. D., L. R. Beach, F. L. Campbell and R. L. Wood. 1980. Family building: a social psychological study of fertility decisions. Population and Environment 3:210–220.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social AlIairs. 1961. The Mysore Population Study. Population Studies 34. New York: United Nations.
WestolI, C. F., R. G. Potter, Jr., P. C. Sagi and E. G. Mishler. 1961. Family Growth in Metropolitan America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yaukey, D., W. Griffiths and B. J. Roberts. 1967. Couple concurrence and empathy on birth control motivation in Dacca, East Pakistan. American Sociological Review 32:716–726.
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, R., Thomson, E. Can spouses be trusted? A look at husband/wife proxy reports. Demography 22, 115–123 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060990
- Family Size
- Proxy Report
- Random Measurement Error
- Fertility Desire
- Desire Family Size