Studies of family size in successive generations have found a small but persistently positive effect of size of family of orientation. Recent work has suggested that this relationship may be influenced by birth order, intergenerational change in lifestyle, and familial satisfaction. Data from a 24-year longitudinal study of women in Pennsylvania indicate that number of siblings does influence size of family of procreation. More important, this relationship is stronger among women who were first-born than later-born, stronger for those not experiencing intergenerational change than for those who changed, and stronger among those who at age 16 were satisfied with their parental family than for those who were dissatisfied.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Althauser, R. P. 1971. Multicollinearity and Non Additive Regression Models. Pp. 453–472 in Hubert M. Blalock, Jr. (ed.), Causal Models in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Altus, W. D. 1966. Birth Order and Its Sequelae. Science 151:44–49.
Berent, J. 1953. The Relationship Between Family Sizes of Two Successive Generations. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 31:39–50.
Bogue, Donald J. 1969. Principles of Demography. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Bumpass, Larry L., and C. F. Westoff. 1970. The Later Years of Childbearing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Crider, Donald M., and F. K. Willits. 1973. Respondent Retrieval Bias in a Longitudinal Study. Sociology and Social Research 58:56–65.
—, F. K. Willits, and R. C. Bealer. 1971. Tracking Respondents in Longitudinal Surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly 35:613–620.
—, F. K. Willits, and R. C. Bealer. 1972. Locating People in Longitudinal Studies. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 778.
—, F. K. Willits, and R. C. Bealer. 1973. Panel Studies: Some Practical Problems. Sociological Methods and Research 2:3–19.
Duncan, O. D., R. Freedman, J. M. Coble, and D. P. Siesinger. 1965. Marital Fertility and Size of Family of Orientation. Demography 2:508–515.
Freedman, D. S. 1963. The Relation of Economic Status to Fertility. American Economic Review 53:414–426.
Hendershot, G. E. 1969. Familial Satisfaction, Birth Order, and Fertility Values. Journal of Marriage and the Family 31:27–33.
Kammeyer, K. 1966. Hirth Order and the Feminine Sex Role Among College Women. American Sociological Review 31:508–515.
Kantner, J. F., and R. G. Potter, Jr. 1954. Social and Psychological Factors Affecting Fertility: XXIV. The Relationship of Family Size in Two Successive Generations. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 32:294–311.
McAllister, P., C. S. Stokes, and M. Knapp. 1974. Size of Family of Orientation, Birth Order, and Fertility Values: A Reexamination. Journal of Marriage and the Family 36:337–342.
Neal, A. G., and H. T. Groat. 1975. Alienation Predictors of Differential Fertility: A Longitudinal Study. American Journal of Sociology 80:1220–1226.
Pearson, K., and A. Lee. 1899. On the Inheritance of Fertility in Mankind. Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Volume 192.
Rossi, A. S. 1965. Naming Children in Middle-Class Families. American Sociological Review 30:499–513.
Ryder, Norman B., and C. F. Westoff. 1971. Reproduction in the United States, 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schachter, Stanley. 1959. The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
—. 1964. Birth Order and Sociometric Choice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 28:453–456.
Stokes, C. S. 1973. Family Structure and Socioeconomic Differentials in Fertility. Population Studies 27:295–304.
Westoff, Charles F., R. G. Potter, Jr., P. C. Sagi, and E. G. Mishler. 1961. Family Growth in Metropolitan America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
—, and R. H. Potvin. 1967. CollegeWomen and Fertility Values. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Whelpton, Pascal K., A. A. Campbell, and J. E. Patterson. 1966. Fertility and Family Planning in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, N.E., Stokes, C.S. Family size in successive generations: The effects of birth order, intergenerational change in lifestyle, and familial satisfaction. Demography 13, 175–187 (1976). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060799
- Family Size
- Successive Generation
- Birth Order
- Current Population Survey
- Marital Fertility