Skip to main content
Log in

Occupational mobility and fertility in metropolitan Latin America

  • Articles
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

The relation between career mobility and reproductive behavior is examined for five cities of developing Latin American nations: Bogota, Columbia; San Jose, Costa Rica; Mexico City, Mexico; Panama City, Panama; and Caracas, Venezuela. The data are obtained from fertility surveys conducted between September, 1963, and August, 1964, in the above-named cities under the auspices of the Centro Latinoamericano de Demografía (CELADE), and the analysis is based on information from 600–800 women per city who have been married only once and married ten years or more. Career mobility is defined as an occupational change of the husband between the date of marriage and 1963–1964, based on the Hall-Jones occupational scale. Reproductive behavior is operationalized as the number of live births. The conclusion of the multiple classification analysis is that the process of career mobility in four out of five Latin American samples is not a significant factor in explaining differential reproductive behavior. These results are compatible with a variety of North American studies which stress that variation heretofore ascribed to the process of mobility is an additive composite of past and present status effects. These findings are discussed; a theoretical and methodological critique of mobility-fertility research is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, Michael, and David Goldberg. 1969. Social Mobility and Kinship: A Reexamination of the Hypothesis. American Anthropologist 71:261–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Frank M., James N. Morgan, and John A. Sonquist. 1967. Multiple Classification Analysis: A Report on a Computer Program for Multiple Regression Using Categorical Predictors. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltzell, E. Digby. 1953. Social Mobility and Fertility Within an Elite Group. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 31:411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent, Jerzy. 1952. Fertility and Social Mobility. Population Studies 5:244–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, H. M., Jr. 1967a. Status Inconsistency and Interaction: Some Alternative Models. American Journal of Sociology 73:305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967b. Status Inconsistency, Social Mobility, Status Integration and Structural Effects. American Sociological Review 32:790–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. 1956. Social Mobility and Interpersonal Relations. American Sociological Review 21: 290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and Otis Dudley Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, Stephan T. 1957. Family Size and Social Mobility in a California Suburb. Eugenics Quarterly 4: 208–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Monica. 1971. Occupational Mobility and Fertility in Urban Latin America. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.

  • Bresard, M. 1950. Mobile Sociale et Dimension de la Famille. Population 3:533–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob. 1968. Multiple Regression as a General Data-Analytic System. Psychological Bulletin 70:426–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Otis Dudley. 1966. Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Social Mobility. In Neil J. Smelser and Seymour Martin Lipset (eds.), Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, David L. 1970. Marital Fertility and the Process of Socio-Economic Attainment: An Examination of the Mobility Hypothesis. Pp. 104–131 in Larry L. Bumpass and Charles F. Westoff, The Later Years of Childbearing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germani, G. 1963. Problems of Establishing Valid Social Research in the Underdeveloped Areas. In Berthold F. Hoselitz and Wilbert E. Moore (eds.), Industrialization and Society. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966. Social and Political Consequences of Mobility. In Neil J. Smelser and Seymour Martin Lipset (eds.), Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, A. 1951. Mobilite SociaIe et Dimensions de la Famille. Population 1:103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, David V., and J. R. Hall. 1954. Social Mobility in Britain: A Study of Inter-Generation Changes in Status. Pp, 177–259 in David V. Glass (ed.), Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge and Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, David. 1959. The Fertility of TwoGeneration Urbanites. Population Studies 12:214–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, John, and D. Caradog Jones. 1950. Social Grading of Occupations. British Journal of Sociology 1:31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, Robert W., and Donald J. Treiman. 1966. Occupational Mobility and Attitudes Toward Negroes. American Sociological Review 31:93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, Keith. 1971. Social Mobility and Fertility. American Sociological Review 36: 1019–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, Bertram. 1957. Social Grading of Occupations in Brazil. British Journal of Sociology 8:176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961. Fertility, Social Mobility and Urban Migration in Brazil. Population Studies 14:182–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iutaka, Sugiyama. 1965. Social Stratification Research in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 1:7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantner, John F., and Clyde V. Kiser. 1954. The Interrelation of Fertility, Fertility Planning and Intergenerational Social Mobility. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 32:69–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessin, Kenneth. 1971. Social and Psychological Consequences of Intergenerational Occupational Mobility. American Journal of Sociology 77:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, Barbara. 1971. Mobility and Work Satisfaction: A Discussion of the Use and Interpretation of Mobility Models. American Journal of Sociology 77: 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melicher, Emanuel. 1965. Least-Squares Analysis of Economic Survey Data. Pp. 373–385 in American Statistical Association, Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section. Washington, D. C.: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. M. 1971. The Future of Social Mobility Studies. American Journal of Sociology 77:62–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miro, Carmen A. 1966. Some Misconceptions Disproved: A Program of Comparative Fertility Surveys in Latin America. Pp. 615–634 in Bernard Berelson (ed.), Family Planning and Population Programs; a Review of World Developments. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Wilbert E. 1965. The Impact of Industry. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrucci, Carolyn Cummings. 1967. Social Origins, Mobility Patterns and Fertility. American Sociological Review 32:615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol. 1959. Uses and Limitations of Mathematical Models in Social Science. Pp, 348–372 in Llewellyn Gross (ed.), Symposium on Sociological Theory. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, Ruth, and Clyde V. Kiser. 1954. Economic Tension and Social Mobility in Relation to Fertility Planning and Size of Planned Family. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 32: 167–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Wolf. 1958. Fertility and Social Mobility Among Teachers. Population Studies 11:251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suits, Daniel B. 1957. Use of Dummy Variables in Regression Equations. Journal of American Statistical Association 52:548–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tien, H. Yuan. 1961. The Social Mobility/ Fertility Hypothesis Reconsidered: An Empirical Study. American Sociological Review 26:247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Social Mobility and Controlled Fertility; Family Origins and Structure of the Australian Academic Elite. New Haven: College and University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, Donald J. 1970. Industrialization and Social Stratification. In Edward O. Laumann (ed.), Social Stratification: Research and Theory for the 1970’s. Indianapolis: BobbsMerrill Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Status Discrepancy and Prejudice. American Journal of Sociology 71:651–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekemans, Rev. R., and J. L. Segundo. 1963. Essay of a Socio-Economic Typology of Latin American Countries. In Egbert DeVries and Jose Medina Echavarria (eds.), Social Aspects of Economic Development in Latin America. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorwaller, Darrel J. 1970. Social Mobility and Membership in Voluntary Associations. American Journal of Sociology 75:481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, Charles F. 1953. The Changing Focus of Differential Fertility Research: The Social Mobility Hypothesis. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 31:24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Marvin Bressler, and Philip C. Sagi. 1960. The Concept of Social Mobility: An Empirical Inquiry. American Sociological Review 25:375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Robert G. Potter, and Philip C. Sagi. 1963. The Third Child: A Study in the Prediction of Fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Robert G. Potter, Philip C. Sagi, and Elliot G. Mishler. 1961. Family Growth in Metropolitan America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, M. Occupational mobility and fertility in metropolitan Latin America. Demography 10, 1–17 (1973). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060747

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2060747

Keywords

Navigation