Abstract
The objectives of this paper are (1) to evaluate the accuracy of the intervening opportunities-competing migrants hypothesis (Stouffer, 1960) in estimating 1955-1960 interstate migration streams in the United States and (2) to compare the results with those obtained by Galle and Taeuber (1966) for metropolitan migration. Our results strongly confirm Stouffer’s hypothesis and yield parameter estimates highly comparable to those obtained for metropolitan migration, except that competing migrants exert a stronger influence than intervening opportunities in interstate migration.
Our study is based on 2,256 interstate migration flows in the continental United States, whereas Stouffer’s intercity study and Galle and Taeuber’s metropolitan study were each based on 116 migration flows. Our results indicate that Stouffer’s theory holds for different levels of aggregation with remarkable consistency.
Several theoretical models of the migration process are more compatible with Stouffer’s original 1940 formulation of intervening opportunities than his 1960 reformulation. Estimates for interstate data indicate that the 1940 definition provides slightly better results. For both these reasons, it would seem that the 1940 formulation should be given serious consideration in future tests of Stouffer’s hypothesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, Theodore R. 1955. Intermetropolitan Migration: A Comparison of the Hypotheses of Zipf and Stouffer. American Sociological Review 20:287–291.
Bright, Margaret L., and Dorothy S. Thomas. 1941. Interstate Migration and Intervening Opportunities. American Sociological Review 6:773–783.
Galle, Orner R., and Karl E. Taeuber. 1966. Metropolitan Migration and Intervening Opportunities. American Sociological Review 31:5–13.
Greenwood, Michael J. 1969. An Analysis of the Determinants of Geographic Labor Mo-bility in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 51:189–194.
—. 1970. Lagged Response in the Decision to Migrate. Journal of Regional Science 10: 375–384.
Isbell, Eleanor Collins. 1944. Internal Migration in Sweden and Intervening Opportunities. American Sociological Review 9:627–639.
Miller, Edward. 1972. A Note on the Role of Distance in Migration: Costs of Mobility Versus Intervening Opportunities. Journal of Regional Science 12:475–478.
Stouffer, Samuel A. 1940. Intervening Opportunities: A Theory Relating Mobility and Distance. American Sociological Review 5: 845–867.
— 1960. Intervening Opportunities and Competing Migrants. Journal of Regional Science 2:1–26.
Strodtbeck, Fred L. 1949. Equal Opportunity Intervals: A Contribution to the Method of Intervening Opportunity Analysis. American Sociological Review 14:490–497.
U. S. Bureau of the Census. 1963. U. S. Census of Population: 1960. Subject Reports. Mobility for States and State Economic Areas. Final Report PC(2)-2B. Washington, D. C., U. S. Government Printing Office.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wadycki, W.J. Stouffer’s Model Of Migration: A Comparison Of Interstate And Metropolitan Flows. Demography 12, 121–128 (1975). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060737
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2060737