Age and marital status at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility

Abstract

Taking care to minimize the truncation bias inherent in cross-sectional data and controlling for other variables, this paper demonstrates the strong effects of both age and marital status at first birth on the pace of subsequent fertility. These effects are particularly strong in the interval immediately following the first birth but persist even into the fourth interval. Important differences are found with respect to the experience of rapid fertility, rather than in the mean lengths of intervals. These results add to the growing attention to the social dimensions of age as a variable in fertility processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bumpass, Larry L., and C. F. Westoff. 1970. The Later Years of Childbearing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, and J. A. Sweet. 1972. Differentials in Marital Instability. American Sociological Review 37:754–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. —, and E. K. Mburugu. 1977. Age at Marriage and Completed Family Size. (Center for Demography and Ecology Working Paper 76-22.) Social Biology 24:31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, A. A. 1968. The Role of Family Planning in the Reduction of Poverty. Journal of Marriage and the Family 30:236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coombs, L. C., and R. Freedman. 1966. Childspacing and Family Economic Position. American Sociological Review 31:631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. —, and R. Freedman. 1970. Premarital Pregnancy, Childspacing, and Later Economic Achievement. Population Studies 24:389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Menken, J. A. 1972. Teenage Childbearing: Its Medical Aspects and Implications for the United States Population. Pp. 331–354 in Charles F. Westoff and R. Parke, Jr. (eds.), Demographic and Social Aspects of Population Growth. Vol. I of Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, Research Reports. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —, and M. C. Sheps. 1970. On Relationships Between Longitudinal Characteristics and Cross-Sectional Data. American Journal of Public Health 60:1506–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Potter, R. G. 1963. Birth Intervals: Structure and Change. Population Studies 17:155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Presser, H. B. 1971. The Timing of the First Birth, Female Roles, and Black Fertility. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 49:329–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rindfuss, R. R., and L. L. Bumpass. 1978. Age and the Sociology of Fertility: How Old is Too Old? Forthcoming in Karl Taeuber, J. Sweet, and L. Bumpass, Social Demography: Research and Prospects. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ryder, Norman B., and C. F. Westoff. 1971. Reproduction in the United States, 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1972. Census of Population: 1970. Marital Status PC(2)-4C. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Westoff, Charles F., and N. B. Ryder. 1977. The Contraceptive Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Whelpton, Pascal K., A. A. Campbell, and J. E. Patterson. 1966. Fertility and Family Planning in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bumpass, L.L., Rindfuss, R.R. & Jamosik, R.B. Age and marital status at first birth and the pace of subsequent fertility. Demography 15, 75–86 (1978). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060491

Download citation

Keywords

  • Life Table
  • Birth Interval
  • Interbirth Interval
  • Parity Progression
  • Subsequent Fertility