Skip to main content
Log in

Industrialization, family and fertility: A structural-psychological analysis of the Brazilian case

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

This paper addresses itself to some linkages between macro-social structure (industrialization, social class), social psychological variables (husband-wife decision making), psychological variables (attitudes), and fertility. A total of 726 currently mated women with proven fertility in five Brazilian communities were interviewed to determine various attitudes, their work experience, their participation in family decisions, their fertility ideals, and actual fertility. The five communities were selected along a rural-urban-industrialization continuum to include a village, two non-industrial cities, and two industrial cities (one of which was Sao Paulo). Family size in the industrial cities was small in all social strata, while in the non-industrial cities family size was large in the lower strata and declined in the upper strata. Further analysis revealed that smaller family size is associated with generally higher levels of status among women—higher educational levels, greater social contacts and more skilled employment, and equality in family decision making. Our analysis supports the hypotheses that industrialization influences fertility through shifts in the social status of women, both in their work and at home. New education and work opportunities facilitate the emergence of modern conceptions of the role of women in society and egalitarian decision making in the family. These attitudes and patterns of husband-wife interaction are related to smaller family size ideals and lower fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, J. A. 1954. Prosperity and Parenthood. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, G. W. 1958. Techniques of Population Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzanella, Waldemiro. 1963. Industrializacao e urbanisacac no Brasil. America Latina 6:3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B. 1966. KAP studies on fertility. In B. Berelson, et aI. (eds.), Family Planning and Population Programs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshers, J. M. 1967. Population Processes in Social Systems. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacker, C. P. 1947. Stages in population growth. Eugenics Review 39:88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, Judith. 1966. Ideal family size among white Americans: A quarter of a century’s evidence. Demography 3:154–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O. and D. M. Wolfe. 1960. Husbands and Wives. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, Raymond. 1965. A method of linear causal analysis: Dependence analysis. American Sociological Review 30:365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, Robert. 1965. Fertility trends and differentials in Latin America. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 43:15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collver, O. Andrew. 1965. Birth Rates in Latin America: New Estimates of Historical Trends and Fluctuations. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley. 1963. The theory of change and response in modem demographic history. Population Index 29:341–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., J. Y. Takeshita, and T. H. Sun. 1964. Fertility and family planning in Taiwan: A case study of the demographic transition. American Journal of Sociology 70: 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — et aI. 1959. Expected family size and family values in West Germany. Population Studies 13:136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendell, M. 1967. Fertility and development in Brazil. Demography 4:143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groat, H. T. and A. G. Neal. 1967. Social psychological correlates of urban fertility. American Sociological Review 32:945–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D. M. 1966. Economic development and fertility. Demography 3:423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. Fertility differentials in Andean countries: A reply to W. H. James. Population Studies 21:71–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Elsa Turner. 1965. Areal differences in Latin American fertility. Population Studies 18:279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R., J. M. Stycos, and K. Back. 1959. The Family and Population Control: A Puerto Rican Experiment in Social Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, B. 1964. Induced abortion in Brazilian married women. America Latina 7: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1965. Color, social class and fertility. America Latina 8:3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and C. Castaldi. 1960. A hierarquia de prestigio des ocupacões. Mobilidade e Trabalho. Rio de Janiero: Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Educacionais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iutaka, Sugiyama. 1965. A estratificacão social e o uso diferencial de metodos anticoncepcionais no Brasil urbano. America Latina 8:101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. 1942. Urbanization and fertility. American Journal of Sociology 48:48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, J. 1968. The Measurement of Modernism: A Study of Values in Brazil and Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser, C. V. and P. K. Whelpton. 1958. Summary of the chief findings [of the Indianapolis study] and implications for future studies. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 36: 282–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Andrée. 1967. Interaction and family planning in the French urban family. Demography 4:615–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miró, Carmen A. 1966. Some misconceptions disproved: A program of comparative fertility surveys in Latin America. In B. Berelson, et al. (eds.), Family Planning and Population Programs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Walter Mertens. 1968. Influences affecting fertility in urban and rural Latin America. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 46 (no. 3, pt. 2):89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notestein, F. W. 1953. The economics of population and food supplies. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, W. 1960. The demographic transition in the Netherlands. American Sociological Review 25:334–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. 1967. Sources of social change in community, family, and fertility in a Puerto Rican town. American Journal of Sociology 72:520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stycos, J. Mayone. 1965. Family size preferences and social class in Peru. American Journal of Sociology 70:651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert Weller. 1967. Female work. ing roles and fertility. Demography 4:210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taeuber, Irene. 1958. The Population of Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. S. 1946. Population and Peace in the Pacific. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisanen, F. B. and J. T. Durlak. 1966. A Survey of Attitudes Related to Costa Rican Population Dynamics. San Jose, Costa Rica: Program a Interamericano de Informacion Popular of the American International Association for Economic and Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, Robert. 1968. The employment of wives, role incompatibility and fertility. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 46:275–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelpton, P. K. 1928. Industrial development and population growth. Social Forces 1:458–467, 629–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaukey, David. 1961. Fertility Differentials in a Modernizing Country. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarate, A. 1967. Fertility in urban areas of Mexico. Demography 4:363–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosen, B.C., Simmons, A.B. Industrialization, family and fertility: A structural-psychological analysis of the Brazilian case. Demography 8, 49–69 (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060338

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2060338

Keywords

Navigation