Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical evaluation of contraceptive methods: Use-effectiveness and extended use-effectiveness

  • Part VI. Medical and Methodological
  • Published:
Demography

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. J. MacLeod and C. Tietze, “Control of Reproductive Capacity,” Annual Review of Medicine, XV (1964), 229–314.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Tietze, “The Clinical Effectiveness of Contraceptive Methods,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LXXVIII (September, 1959), 650–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. W. Beebe and C. J. Gamble, “The Effect of Contraception upon Human Fertility,” Human Biology, III (September, 1938),372–87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. W. Beebe, Contraception. and Fertility in the Southern Appalachians (Baltimore: Williama and Wilkins, 1942), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. E. Johnson and W. H. Masters, “Intravaginal Contraceptive Study: Physiology,” Western Journal of Surgery, Obstetricsand Gynecology, LXXI (May–June, 1963), 144–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Tietze, S. R. Poliakoff, and J. Rock, “The Clinical Effectiveness of the Rhythm Method of Contraception,” Fertility and Sterility, II (September–October, 1951), 444–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Tietze, “The Clinical Effectiveness ...,” op. cit., “.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beebe, op. cit.,, pp. 124–37; C. Chandrasekaran and K. Kuder, Family Planning through Clinics: Report of a Survey of Family Planning Clinic8 in Greater Bombay (Bombay: Allied Publishers, 1965), pp. 161–62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. F. Westoff, R. G. Potter, P. C. Sagi, and E. G. Mishler, Family Growth in Metropolitan America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961), pp, 70–102; P. K. Whelpton, A. S. Camphell, and J. E. Patterson, Fertility and Family Planning in the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965), pp. 288–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Pearl, “Contraception and Fertility in 2,000 Women,” Human Biology, IV (September, 1932), 363–407.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Tietze, “The Use-Effectiveness of Contraceptive Methods,” in Clyde V. Kiser (ed.), Researchin Family Planning (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962), pp, 357–69.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. W. Jones and W. P. Mauldin, “Use of Oral Contraceptives: with Special Reference to Developing Countries, Studies in Family Planning XXIV (December, 1967), 1–13; W. P. Mauldin, D. Nortman, and F. F. Stephan, “Retention of IUDs: an International Comparison,” ibid., XVIII (April, 1957), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Potter, “Application of Life Table Technique to Measurement of Contraceptive Effectiveness,” Demography, III, 2 (1966), 297–304; R. V. Rider, P. E. White, A. R. Ghazi, and P. A. Harper, “Use of the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device in Rural West Pakistan,” Demography, III, 2 (1966), 332–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. G. Potter, “The Multiple Decrement Life Table as an Approach to the Measurement of Use Effectiveness and Demographic Effectiveness of Contraception,” Contributed Papers: Sydney Conference (International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, 1967), pp. 869–83.

  15. C. Tietze, “Intra-uterine Contraception: Recommended Procedures for Data Analysis,” Studies in Family Planning, XVIII (April, 1967 [suppl.]), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tietze, C., Lewit, S. Statistical evaluation of contraceptive methods: Use-effectiveness and extended use-effectiveness. Demography 5, 931–940 (1968). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2060282

Keywords

Navigation