Abstract
A sample of 1,123 sixth, ninth, and twelfth graders in two Southern counties was questioned to ascertain how many children they think is ideal. More than three-fourths of the students in each grade had given thought to an ideal number of children for themselves; fewer had thought about the ideal number for the average American couple. Two and three children were the modal responses; mean ideal sizes were 3.02 for self and 3.16 for the average couple. The range of acceptable fertility behavior, “too few” or “too many” children, is defined by medians of 1.56 and 5.96. Ideal and acceptable family sizes increase slightly in the higher grades. A sex difference in ideals appeared only at grade 12; girls wanted more children. Negroes wanted fewer children than did whites at grade 6, more at grade 12. Size of family of orientation was directly related to ideals at grades 6 and 9, but the relation was curvilinear at grade 12. The direct relation between ideals and socioeconomic status became more pronounced at grade 12. Ideal sizes were larger for Catholics than for other religious groups. The study lends at least minimal support to the notion that early socialization affects ideas about family size.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blake, Judith. 1966. Ideal family size among white Americans: a quarter of a century’s evidence. Demography 3:154–173.
Bumpass, Larry. 1967. Stability and change in family size expectations over the first two years of marriage. Journal of Social Issues 23:83–98.
Freedman, Ronald. 1967. Expectations about family size. Paper prepared for a luncheon roundtable discussion at annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, California, August.
— and Harry Sharp. 1954. Correlates of values about ideal family size in the Detroit metropolitan area. Population Studies 8:35–45.
—, P. K. Whelpton, and Arthur A. Campbell. 1959. Family Planning, Sterility, and Population Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gustavus, Susan. 1968. The formation and stability of ideal family size norms among young people. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
Gustavus, Susan and Kent G. Mommsen. 1969. Negro white differentials in the formation of ideal family size among young people. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, New Orleans, Louisiana, April.
Hendershot, Gerry E. 1967. Fertility values in two generations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Cincinnati, Ohio, April.
Higgins, Edward. 1962. Some fertility attitudes among white women in Johannesburg. Population Studies 16:70–78.
Kantner, John F. and Robert G. Potter. 1954. The relation of family size in two successive generations. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 32:294–311.
Kiser, Clyde V. and P. K. Whelpton. 1958. Social and psychological factors affecting fertility: summary of chief findings and implications for future studies. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 36:282–329.
Nam, Charles B. and Mary G. Powers. 1968. Changes in the relative status level of workers in the United States, 1950–1960. Social Forces 47:158–170.
United States Bureau of the Census. 1963. Methodology and Scores of Socioeconomic Status. Working Paper No. 15. Washington: U.B. Government Printing Office.
Westoff, Charles F., Robert G. Potter, Jr., and Philip C. Sagi. 1963. The Third Child: A Study in the Prediction of Fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
— and Richard H. Potvin. 1966. Higher education, religion, and women’s family size orientations. American Sociological Review 31:489–496.
Whelpton, Pascal K., Arthur A. Campbell, and John E. Patterson. 1966. Fertility and Family Planning in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yeracaris, Constantine. 1959. Differentials in ideal family size: Buffalo, 1956. Sociology and Social Research 44:8–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gustavus, S.O., Nam, C.B. The formation and stability of ideal family size among young people. Demography 7, 43–51 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/2060021
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2060021