Abstract
A box model based on salinity distributions and freshwater inflow measurements was developed and used to estimate net non-tidal physical circulation and hydraulic residence times for Patuxent River estuary, Maryland, a tributary estuary of Chesapeake Bay. The box model relaxes the usual assumption that salinity is at steady-state, an important improvement over previous box model studies, yet it remains simple enough to have broad appeal. Average monthly 2-dimensional net non-tidal circulation and residence times for 1986–1995 are estimated and related to river flow and salt water inflow as estimated by the box model. An important result is that advective exchange at the estuary mouth was not correlated with Patuxent River flow, most likely due to effects of offshore salinity changes in Chesapeake Bay. The median residence time for freshwater entering at the head of the estuary was 68 d and decreased hyperbolically with increasing river flow to 30 d during high flow. Estimates of residence times for down-estuary points of origin showed that, from the head of the estuary to its mouth, control of flushing changed from primarily river flow to other factors regulating the intensity of gravitational circulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Asselin, S. andM. L. Spaulding. 1993. Flushing times for the Providence River based on tracer experiments.Estuaries 16: 830–839.
Bahner, L. H., R. C. Reynolds, andR. A. Batiuk. 1991. Volumetric analysis of dissolved oxygen trends in the Chesapeake Bay: Preliminary findings. p. 485–494.In J. A. Mihursky and A. Chaney (eds.), New Perspectives in the Chesapeake System: A Research and Management Partnership. Proceedings of a Conference. December 4–6, 1990. Baltimore, Maryland. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publication 137. Chesapeake Research Consortium. Edgewater, Maryland.
Boicourt, W. C. andL. P. Sanford. 1988. A Hydrodynamic Study of the Patuxent River Estuary. Final Report. Maryland Department of the Environment, Baltimore, Maryland.
Chao, S.-Y., W. C. Boicourt, andH. V. C. Wang. 1996. Three-layered circulation in reverse estuaries.Continental Shelf Research 16:1379–1397.
Cronin, W. B. andD. W. Pritchard. 1975. Additional Statistics on the Dimensions of the Chesapeake Bay and Its Tributaries: Cross-section Widths and Segment Volumes per Meter Depth. Special Report 42. Reference 75-3. Chesapeake Bay Institute, The Johns Hopkins University. Baltimore, Maryland.
Day, Jr.,J. W., C. A. S. Hall, W. M. Kemp, andA. Yáñez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
Dyer, K. R. 1973. Estuaries: A Physical Introduction. John Wiley and Sons. New York.
Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Guide to Using the Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program Data. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.
Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. 1985 Reference Scenario. Phase IV Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model Documentation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland.
Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program Database. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Office. 410 Severn Avenue, Annapolis, Maryland 21403.
Fischer, H. B., E. J. List, R. C. Y. Koh, J. Imberger, andN. H. Brooks. 1979. Mixing in Inland and Coastal Waters. Academic Press, Inc., New York.
Hagy, J. D. 1996. Residence time and net ecosystem processes in Patuxent River estuary. M.S. Thesis, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland.
Kvalseth, T. O. 1985. A cautionary note about r2.American Statistician 39:279–286.
Linker, L. C., G. W. Shenk, R. L. Dennis, and J. S. Sweeney. in press. Cross-Media Models of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Airshed.ASCE Journal of Environmental Modeling.
Longley, W. L. 1994. Freshwater Inflows to Texas Bays and Estuaries: Ecological Relationships and Methods for Determination of Needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.
Miller, R. L. andB. F. McPherson. 1991. Estimating estuarine flushing and residence times in Charlotte Harbor, Florida, via salt balance and a box model.Limnology and Oceanography 36:602–612.
Monbet, Y. 1992. Control of phytoplankton biomass in estuaries: A comparative analysis of microtidal and macrotidal estuaries.Estuaries 15:563–571.
Muller, F. L. L., M. Tranter, andP. W. Balls. 1994. Distribution and transport of chemical constituents in the Clyde estuary.Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 39:1056–126.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1985–1996. Climatological Data Annual Summary. Maryland and Delaware. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
Nixon, S. W., J. Ammerman, L. P. Atkinson, V. M. Berounsky, G. Billen, W. C. Boicourt, W. R. Boynton, T. C. Church, D. M. DiToro, R. Elmgren, J. H. Garber, A. E. Giblin, R. A. Jahnke, N. J. P. Owens, M. E. Q. Pilson, andS. P. Seitzinger. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the north Atlantic Ocean.Biogeochemistry 35:141–180.
Officer, C. B. 1980. Box models revisited. p. 65–114.In P. Hamilton and R. B. Macdonald (eds.), Estuarine and Wetland Processes. Marine Sciences Series. Volume 11. Plenum Press. New York.
Paucot, H. andR. Wollast. 1997. Transport and transformation of trace metals in the Scheldt estuary.Marine Chemistry 58:299–244.
Pilson, M. E. Q. 1985. On the residence time of water in Naragansett Bay.Estuaries 8:2–14.
Pritchard, D. W. 1960. Salt balance and exchange rate for Chincoteague Bay.Chesapeake Science 1:48–57.
Pritchard, D. W. 1969. Dispersion and flushing of pollutants in estuaries.American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of the Hydraulics Division 95 (HYI):115–124.
Reynolds, R. C. and L. H. Bahner. 1989. A Three Dimensional Interpolator for Estimating Water Quality Conditions in the Chesapeake Bay: Description with Preliminary Application to Dissolved Oxygen. In-house report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland.
Sanford, L. P., W. C. Boicourt, andS. R. Rives. 1992. Model for estimating tidal flushing of small embayments.Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 118:635–654.
SASInstitute, Inc. 1990 SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edition, Volume 2. SAS Institute Inc., SAS Campus Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27513.
Smith, S. V., J. T. Hollibaugh, S. J. Dollar, andS. Vink. 1991. Tomales Bay metabolism: C-N-P stoichiometry and ecosystem heterotrophy at the land-sea interface.Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 33:223–257.
Taft, J. L., A. J. Elliott, andW. R. Taylor. 1978. Box model analysis of Chesapeake Bay ammonium and nitrate fluxes, p. 115–130.In M. L. Wiley (ed.), Estuarine Interactions. Academic Press, New York.
United States Geological Survey 1985–1996. Water Resources Data. Maryland and Delaware. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data, Reports, MD-DE-85 to MD-DE-96. U.S. Geological Survey, Towson, Maryland.
Vallino, J. J. andC. S. Hopkinson, Jr. 1998. Estimation of dispersion and characteristics mixing times in Plum Island Sound estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 46:333–350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagy, J.D., Boynton, W.R. & Sanford, L.P. Estimation of net physical transport and hydraulic residence times for a coastal plain estuary using box models. Estuaries 23, 328–340 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2307/1353325
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1353325