Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine what effect, if any, large pile-supported platforms (piers) have on the habitat distribution and abundance of juvenile fishes. Trapping techniques were used in 1993 and 1994 under piers, in pile fields, and in open-water habitat types in shallow areas (<5 m) in the lower Hudson River estuary (40°44′N, 70°01′W). Nearly 1500 fishes, mostly juveniles, representing 24 species were collected in 1865 trap-days from May through October in the 2-yr study. The presence of relatively large numbers of young-of-the-year (YOY) fish during both years lends support to the idea that shallow areas in the lower Hudson River estuary currently function as nursery habitats for a variety of fishes. Two seasonal assemblages were apparent, but their composition varied somewhat between years.Microgadus tomcod andPseudopleuronectes americanus YOY dominated an early summer assemblage (May–July) while large numbers of YOYMorone saxatilis were collected as part of a late summer assemblage (August–September). The effects of habitat type on fish assemblage structure were significant during both years. Fish abundance and species richness were typically low under piers; YOY fishes were rare andAnguilla rostrata accounted for a large proportion of the total catch. In contrast, YOY fishes dominated collections at pile field and open-water stations, where abundance and species richness were high. These results indicate that habitat quality under the platforms of large piers (>20,000 m2) is probably poor for YOY fishes when compared with nearby pile field and open-water habitat types.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature
Able, K. W. andM. P. Fahay. 1998. The First Year in the Life of Estuarine Fishes in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Able, K. W. andL. S. Hales, Jr. 1997. Habitat fidelity, movements and growth of juvenile black sea bass,Centropristis striata, in a southern New Jersey estuary.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 213:153–167.
Able, K. W., A. L. Studholme, andJ. P. Manderson. 1995. Habitat Quality in the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary: An Evaluation of Pier Effects on Fishes. Final Report. Hudson River Foundation, New York.
Bailey, K. M. andE. D. Houde. 1989. Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem.Advances in Marine Biology 25:1–83.
Beebe, C. A. andI. R. Savidge. 1988. Historical perspective of fish species composition and distribution in the Hudson River Estuary.American Fisheries Society Monograph 4:25–36.
Benfield, M. C. andT. J. Minello. 1996. Reactive effects of turbidity and light intensity on reactive distance and feeding of an estuarine fish.Environmental Biology of Fishes 46:211–216.
Blaxter, J. H. S. 1970. 2. Light 2.3. Animals 2.32 Fishes, p. 213–320.In O. Kinney (ed.), Marine Ecology, Volume 1, Environmental Factors. Part 1. John Wiley and Sons, London.
Boynton, W. R., T. T. Polgar, andH. H. Zion. 1981. Importance of juvenile striped bass food habits in the Potomac Estuary.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:56–63.
Bray, J. R. andJ. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.Ecological Monographs 27:325–349.
Brosnan, T. M. andM. L. O’Shea. 1996. Long-term improvements in water quality due to sewage abatement in the lower Hudson River.Estuaries 19(4):890–900.
Campbell, B. C. andK. W. Able. 1998. Aspects of the life history of the northern pipefish.Syngnathus fuscus.Estuaries. 21:470–475.
Cantelmo, F. R., L. Vale, T. Kelly, andB. Stewart. 1985. Importance of underpier areas in the lower Hudson River for striped bass.Coastal Zone Management 85:706–715.
Cantelmo, F. R. andC. H. Wahtola, Jr. 1992. Aquatic habitat impacts of pile-supported and other structures in the lower Hudson River, p. 59–75.In W. Wise, D. J. Suszkowski, and J. R. Waldman (eds.), Proceedings: Conference on the Impacts of New York Harbor Development on Aquatic Resources. Hudson River Foundation, New York.
Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure.Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117–143.
Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 1994. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. National Environmental Research Council, United Kingdom.
Cooper, J. A. 1996. Monophyly and intrarelationships of the family Pleuronectidae (Pleuronectiformes), with a revised classification. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Cushing, D. H. 1974. The possible density-dependence of larval mortality and adult mortality in fishes, p. 103–112.In J. H. S. Blaxter (ed.), The Early Life History of Fish. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Cushing, D. H. 1996. Towards a science of recruitment in fish populations. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.
Dawson-Shepard, A. R., R. M. Warwick, andK. R. Clarke. 1992. An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives.Environmental Biology of Fishes 33:367–380.
Dew, C. B. andJ. H. Hecht. 1994. Hatching, estuarine transport, and distribution of larval and early juvenile Atlantic tomcod,Microgadus tomcod, in the Hudson River.Estuaries 17:472–488.
Dovel, W. L.. 1992. Movements of immature striped bass in the Hudson Estuary, p. 279–302.In C. L. Smith (ed.), Estuarine Research in the 1980s. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.
Duval, E. J. andK. W. Able. 1998. Aspects of the life history of the seaboard goby,Gobiosoma ginsburgi, in estuarine and inner continental shelf waters.Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 43:5–10.
Energy and Environmental Analysts, Incorporated. 1988. Hudson River Center Site Aquatic Environmental Study. Final Report. Prepared for New York City Public Development Corporation. Energy and Environmental Analysts, Incorporated. New York.
Esser, S. C. 1982. Long-term changes in some finfishes of the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, p. 299–314.In G. F. Mayer (ed.), Ecological Stress and the New York Bight: Science and Management. Estuarine Research Federation, Columbia, South Carolina.
Folk, R. L. 1980. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin, Texas.
Gottholm, B. W., M. R. Harmon, andD. D. Turgeon. 1993. Assessment of chemical contaminants in the Hudson-Raritan Estuary and coastal New Jersey. Marine Environmental Quality Report to the National Status and Trends Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Grecay, P. A. andT. E. Targett. 1996. Effects of turbidity, light level and prey concentration on feeding of juvenile weakfish,Cynoscion regalis.Marine Ecology Progress Series 131:11–16.
Gere, J. S., K. R. Clarke, R. M. Warwick, andG. Hobbes. 1990. Detection of initial effects of pollution on marine benthos: An example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oil fields, North Sea.Marine Ecology Progress Series 66:285–299.
Helfman, G. S., D. E. Facey, L. S. Hales, Jr., andE. L. Bozeman, Jr. 1987. Reproductive ecology of the American eel.American Fisheries Society Symposium 1:42–56.
Herrick, C. J. 1904. The organ and sense of taste in fishes.Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission. Vol. XXII for 1902: 239–272.
Houde, E. D. 1987. Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability.American Fisheries Society Symposium 2:17–29.
Klauda, R. J., R. E. Moos, andR. E. Schmidt. 1988. Life history of Atlantic tomcod,Microgadus tomcod, in the Hudson River Estuary, with emphasis on spatio-temporal distribution and movements, p. 219–251.In C.L. Smith (ed.), Fisheries Research in the Hudson River. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.
Mackenzie C. L. Jr. 1990. History of the fisheries of Raritan Bay, New York and New Jersey.Marine Fisheries Review 52:1–45.
McLaren, J. B., T. H. Peck, W. P. Dey, andM. Gardinier. 1988. Biology of Atlantic tomcod in the Hudson River Estuary.American Fisheries Society Monograph 4:102–112.
Miles, S. G. 1968. Rheotaxis of elvers of the American celAnguilla rostrata in the laboratory to water from different streams in Nova Scotia.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25:1591–1602.
Moran, M. A. andD. S. Kiefer. 1986. The Westway, p. 131–154.In K. E. Limberg, M. A. Moran, and W. H. McDowell (eds.), The Hudson River Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.
O’Connor, J. M. andR. J. Headgate. 1988. Aquatic pollution problems, North Atlantic coast, including Chesapeake Bay.Aquatic Toxicology 11:163–190.
Olla, B. L., R. Wicklund, andS. Wilk. 1969. Behavior of winter flounder in a natural habitat.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 98:717–720.
Pearce, J. B. 1979. Raritan Bay— a highly polluted estuarine system, p. 32–47In J. B. Pearce (ed.), Reviews of Water Quality and Transport of Materials in Coastal and Estuarine Waters. Cooperative Research Report Number, 118. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pearce, J. B. 1993. Coastal development and cumulative effects, p. 1645–1659.In. Coastal Zone 1993, Proceedings, Eighth Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management. American Society of Civil Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Pearcy, W. G. 1962. Ecology of an estuarine population of winter flounder,Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Walbaum).Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection, Yale University 18:1–78.
Phelan, B. A. 1992. Winter flounder movements in the inner New York Bight.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121: 777–784.
Sissenwine, M. P. 1984. Why do fish populations vary?, p. 59–94.In R. M. May (ed.), Exploitation of Marine Communities. Dahlem Konferenzen, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Sissenwine, M. P., E. B. Cohen, andM. D. Grosslein. 1984. Structure of the Georges Bank ecosystem.Rapports et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 183:243–254.
Stoecker, R. R., J. Collura, andP. J. Fallon, Jr. 1992. Aquatic studies at the Hudson River Center site, p. 407–427.In C. L. Smith (ed.), Estuarine Research in the 1980s: Hudson River Environmental Society, Seventh Symposium on Hudson River Ecology. State of New York Press, Albany, New York.
Studholme, A. L. 1988. An overview of the biological resources of the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, p. 59–94.In Hudson/Raritan Estuary: Issues, Resources, Status and Management. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Estuarine Programs Office, NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Seminar Series, Number 9. Washington, D.C.
Tesch, F.-W. 1975. 8. Orientation in space: Animals, 8.2 Fishes, p. 657–707.In O. Kinney (ed.), Marine Ecology, Volume II, Physiological Mechanisms, Part 2. John Wiley and Sons, London, England.
Tesch, F.-W. 1977. The Eel. Chapman and Hall, Limited. London, England.
United States Army Corps of Engineers— New York Division and United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Region I. 1984. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Westway Highway Project, Volume II, Fisheries Portion.
United States Department of Commerce. 1992. Tide Tables 1993.
United States Department of Commerce. 1993. Tide Tables 1994.
Valette-Silver, N. J. 1993. The use of sediment cores to reconstruct historical trends in contamination of estuarine and coastal sediments.Estuaries 16:577–588.
Waldman, J. R. 1992. Determining the habitat value of piers and platforms: An empirical approach, p. 207–221.In W. Wise, D. J. Suszkowski, and J. R. Waldman (eds.), Proceedings: Conference on the Impacts of New York Harbor Development on Aquatic Resources. Hudson River Foundation, New York.
Wilk, S. J. 1984. Finfish resources of the Sandy Hook Bay—Lower Bay complex— A review of research findings, p. 25–32.In A. L. Pacheco (ed.), Raritan Bay—Its Multiple Uses and Abuses. Workshop sponsored by American Littoral Society, New Jersey Marine Sciences Consortium, National Marine Fisheries Service, Sandy Hook Laboratory, Technical Series Report Number 30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Able, K.W., Manderson, J.P. & Studholme, A.L. The distribution of shallow water juvenile fishes in an urban estuary: The effects of manmade structures in the lower Hudson River. Estuaries 21, 731–744 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1353277
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1353277