Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The distribution of shallow water juvenile fishes in an urban estuary: The effects of manmade structures in the lower Hudson River

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine what effect, if any, large pile-supported platforms (piers) have on the habitat distribution and abundance of juvenile fishes. Trapping techniques were used in 1993 and 1994 under piers, in pile fields, and in open-water habitat types in shallow areas (<5 m) in the lower Hudson River estuary (40°44′N, 70°01′W). Nearly 1500 fishes, mostly juveniles, representing 24 species were collected in 1865 trap-days from May through October in the 2-yr study. The presence of relatively large numbers of young-of-the-year (YOY) fish during both years lends support to the idea that shallow areas in the lower Hudson River estuary currently function as nursery habitats for a variety of fishes. Two seasonal assemblages were apparent, but their composition varied somewhat between years.Microgadus tomcod andPseudopleuronectes americanus YOY dominated an early summer assemblage (May–July) while large numbers of YOYMorone saxatilis were collected as part of a late summer assemblage (August–September). The effects of habitat type on fish assemblage structure were significant during both years. Fish abundance and species richness were typically low under piers; YOY fishes were rare andAnguilla rostrata accounted for a large proportion of the total catch. In contrast, YOY fishes dominated collections at pile field and open-water stations, where abundance and species richness were high. These results indicate that habitat quality under the platforms of large piers (>20,000 m2) is probably poor for YOY fishes when compared with nearby pile field and open-water habitat types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Able, K. W. andM. P. Fahay. 1998. The First Year in the Life of Estuarine Fishes in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W. andL. S. Hales, Jr. 1997. Habitat fidelity, movements and growth of juvenile black sea bass,Centropristis striata, in a southern New Jersey estuary.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 213:153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Able, K. W., A. L. Studholme, andJ. P. Manderson. 1995. Habitat Quality in the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary: An Evaluation of Pier Effects on Fishes. Final Report. Hudson River Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. M. andE. D. Houde. 1989. Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem.Advances in Marine Biology 25:1–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, C. A. andI. R. Savidge. 1988. Historical perspective of fish species composition and distribution in the Hudson River Estuary.American Fisheries Society Monograph 4:25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfield, M. C. andT. J. Minello. 1996. Reactive effects of turbidity and light intensity on reactive distance and feeding of an estuarine fish.Environmental Biology of Fishes 46:211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaxter, J. H. S. 1970. 2. Light 2.3. Animals 2.32 Fishes, p. 213–320.In O. Kinney (ed.), Marine Ecology, Volume 1, Environmental Factors. Part 1. John Wiley and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton, W. R., T. T. Polgar, andH. H. Zion. 1981. Importance of juvenile striped bass food habits in the Potomac Estuary.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. andJ. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.Ecological Monographs 27:325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, T. M. andM. L. O’Shea. 1996. Long-term improvements in water quality due to sewage abatement in the lower Hudson River.Estuaries 19(4):890–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. C. andK. W. Able. 1998. Aspects of the life history of the northern pipefish.Syngnathus fuscus.Estuaries. 21:470–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantelmo, F. R., L. Vale, T. Kelly, andB. Stewart. 1985. Importance of underpier areas in the lower Hudson River for striped bass.Coastal Zone Management 85:706–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantelmo, F. R. andC. H. Wahtola, Jr. 1992. Aquatic habitat impacts of pile-supported and other structures in the lower Hudson River, p. 59–75.In W. Wise, D. J. Suszkowski, and J. R. Waldman (eds.), Proceedings: Conference on the Impacts of New York Harbor Development on Aquatic Resources. Hudson River Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure.Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 1994. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. National Environmental Research Council, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. A. 1996. Monophyly and intrarelationships of the family Pleuronectidae (Pleuronectiformes), with a revised classification. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, D. H. 1974. The possible density-dependence of larval mortality and adult mortality in fishes, p. 103–112.In J. H. S. Blaxter (ed.), The Early Life History of Fish. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing, D. H. 1996. Towards a science of recruitment in fish populations. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson-Shepard, A. R., R. M. Warwick, andK. R. Clarke. 1992. An analysis of fish community responses to coral mining in the Maldives.Environmental Biology of Fishes 33:367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, C. B. andJ. H. Hecht. 1994. Hatching, estuarine transport, and distribution of larval and early juvenile Atlantic tomcod,Microgadus tomcod, in the Hudson River.Estuaries 17:472–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovel, W. L.. 1992. Movements of immature striped bass in the Hudson Estuary, p. 279–302.In C. L. Smith (ed.), Estuarine Research in the 1980s. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, E. J. andK. W. Able. 1998. Aspects of the life history of the seaboard goby,Gobiosoma ginsburgi, in estuarine and inner continental shelf waters.Bulletin of the New Jersey Academy of Science 43:5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy and Environmental Analysts, Incorporated. 1988. Hudson River Center Site Aquatic Environmental Study. Final Report. Prepared for New York City Public Development Corporation. Energy and Environmental Analysts, Incorporated. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, S. C. 1982. Long-term changes in some finfishes of the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, p. 299–314.In G. F. Mayer (ed.), Ecological Stress and the New York Bight: Science and Management. Estuarine Research Federation, Columbia, South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L. 1980. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Publishing Company, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottholm, B. W., M. R. Harmon, andD. D. Turgeon. 1993. Assessment of chemical contaminants in the Hudson-Raritan Estuary and coastal New Jersey. Marine Environmental Quality Report to the National Status and Trends Program, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grecay, P. A. andT. E. Targett. 1996. Effects of turbidity, light level and prey concentration on feeding of juvenile weakfish,Cynoscion regalis.Marine Ecology Progress Series 131:11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gere, J. S., K. R. Clarke, R. M. Warwick, andG. Hobbes. 1990. Detection of initial effects of pollution on marine benthos: An example from the Ekofisk and Eldfisk oil fields, North Sea.Marine Ecology Progress Series 66:285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfman, G. S., D. E. Facey, L. S. Hales, Jr., andE. L. Bozeman, Jr. 1987. Reproductive ecology of the American eel.American Fisheries Society Symposium 1:42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, C. J. 1904. The organ and sense of taste in fishes.Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission. Vol. XXII for 1902: 239–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde, E. D. 1987. Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability.American Fisheries Society Symposium 2:17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauda, R. J., R. E. Moos, andR. E. Schmidt. 1988. Life history of Atlantic tomcod,Microgadus tomcod, in the Hudson River Estuary, with emphasis on spatio-temporal distribution and movements, p. 219–251.In C.L. Smith (ed.), Fisheries Research in the Hudson River. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie C. L. Jr. 1990. History of the fisheries of Raritan Bay, New York and New Jersey.Marine Fisheries Review 52:1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, J. B., T. H. Peck, W. P. Dey, andM. Gardinier. 1988. Biology of Atlantic tomcod in the Hudson River Estuary.American Fisheries Society Monograph 4:102–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S. G. 1968. Rheotaxis of elvers of the American celAnguilla rostrata in the laboratory to water from different streams in Nova Scotia.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25:1591–1602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, M. A. andD. S. Kiefer. 1986. The Westway, p. 131–154.In K. E. Limberg, M. A. Moran, and W. H. McDowell (eds.), The Hudson River Ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. M. andR. J. Headgate. 1988. Aquatic pollution problems, North Atlantic coast, including Chesapeake Bay.Aquatic Toxicology 11:163–190.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olla, B. L., R. Wicklund, andS. Wilk. 1969. Behavior of winter flounder in a natural habitat.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 98:717–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. B. 1979. Raritan Bay— a highly polluted estuarine system, p. 32–47In J. B. Pearce (ed.), Reviews of Water Quality and Transport of Materials in Coastal and Estuarine Waters. Cooperative Research Report Number, 118. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. B. 1993. Coastal development and cumulative effects, p. 1645–1659.In. Coastal Zone 1993, Proceedings, Eighth Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management. American Society of Civil Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy, W. G. 1962. Ecology of an estuarine population of winter flounder,Pseudopleuronectes americanus (Walbaum).Bulletin of the Bingham Oceanographic Collection, Yale University 18:1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, B. A. 1992. Winter flounder movements in the inner New York Bight.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121: 777–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sissenwine, M. P. 1984. Why do fish populations vary?, p. 59–94.In R. M. May (ed.), Exploitation of Marine Communities. Dahlem Konferenzen, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sissenwine, M. P., E. B. Cohen, andM. D. Grosslein. 1984. Structure of the Georges Bank ecosystem.Rapports et Proces-Verbaux des Reunions, Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 183:243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R. R., J. Collura, andP. J. Fallon, Jr. 1992. Aquatic studies at the Hudson River Center site, p. 407–427.In C. L. Smith (ed.), Estuarine Research in the 1980s: Hudson River Environmental Society, Seventh Symposium on Hudson River Ecology. State of New York Press, Albany, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Studholme, A. L. 1988. An overview of the biological resources of the Hudson-Raritan Estuary, p. 59–94.In Hudson/Raritan Estuary: Issues, Resources, Status and Management. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Estuarine Programs Office, NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Seminar Series, Number 9. Washington, D.C.

  • Tesch, F.-W. 1975. 8. Orientation in space: Animals, 8.2 Fishes, p. 657–707.In O. Kinney (ed.), Marine Ecology, Volume II, Physiological Mechanisms, Part 2. John Wiley and Sons, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, F.-W. 1977. The Eel. Chapman and Hall, Limited. London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Army Corps of Engineers— New York Division and United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Region I. 1984. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, Westway Highway Project, Volume II, Fisheries Portion.

  • United States Department of Commerce. 1992. Tide Tables 1993.

  • United States Department of Commerce. 1993. Tide Tables 1994.

  • Valette-Silver, N. J. 1993. The use of sediment cores to reconstruct historical trends in contamination of estuarine and coastal sediments.Estuaries 16:577–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, J. R. 1992. Determining the habitat value of piers and platforms: An empirical approach, p. 207–221.In W. Wise, D. J. Suszkowski, and J. R. Waldman (eds.), Proceedings: Conference on the Impacts of New York Harbor Development on Aquatic Resources. Hudson River Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilk, S. J. 1984. Finfish resources of the Sandy Hook Bay—Lower Bay complex— A review of research findings, p. 25–32.In A. L. Pacheco (ed.), Raritan Bay—Its Multiple Uses and Abuses. Workshop sponsored by American Littoral Society, New Jersey Marine Sciences Consortium, National Marine Fisheries Service, Sandy Hook Laboratory, Technical Series Report Number 30.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth W. Able.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Able, K.W., Manderson, J.P. & Studholme, A.L. The distribution of shallow water juvenile fishes in an urban estuary: The effects of manmade structures in the lower Hudson River. Estuaries 21, 731–744 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1353277

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1353277

Keywords

Navigation