Estuaries

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 481–490 | Cite as

Effect of water residence time on annual export and denitrification of nitrogen in estuaries: A model analysis

  • Edward H. Dettmann
Article

Abstract

A simple model of annual average response of an estuary to mean nitrogen loading rate and freshwater residence time was developed and tested. It uses nitrogen inputs from land, deposition from the atmosphere, and first-order calculations of internal loss rate and net export to perform a steady-state analysis over a yearly cycle. The model calculates the fraction of total nitrogen input from land and the atmosphere that is exported and the fraction that is denitrified or lost to other processes within the estuary. The model was tested against data from the literature for 11 North American and European estuaries having a wide range of physical characteristics, nitrogen loading rates, and geographical and climatic settings. The model shows that the fraction of nitrogen entering an estuary that is exported or denitrified can be predicted from the freshwater residence time. The first-order rate constant for nitrogen loss within an estuary, as a fraction of total nitrogen in the water column, is 0.30 mo−1. Denitrification typically accounts for 69–75% of the total annual net nitrogen removal from the water column by processes within the estuary. The model makes explicit the dependence of nitrogen concentration in the water column on the loading rate of nitrogen, water residence time, estuary volume, and the rate constant for loss within the estuary.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alber, M. and A. B. Chan. 1994. Sources of contaminants to Boston Harbor: Revised loading estimates. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Environmental Quality Department Technical Report Series No. 94-1, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, R. B. andE. L. Beasley. 1988. Bottom and suspended sediments in the Delaware River and Estuary, p. 116–131.In S. K. Majumdar, E. W. Miller, and L. E. Sage (eds.), Ecology and Restoration of the Delaware River Basin. The Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Easton, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  3. Billen, G., M. Somville, E. De Becker, andP. Servais. 1985. A nitrogen budget of the Scheldt hydrographical basin.Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 19:223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolin, B. andH. Rodhe. 1973. A note on the concepts of age distribution and transit time in natural reservoirs.Tellus, 25:58–62.Google Scholar
  5. Boynton, W. R., J. H. Garber, R. Summer, andW. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries, 18:285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boynton, W. R., W. M. Kemp, andC. W. Keefe. 1982. A comparative analysis of nutrients and other factors influencing estuarine phytoplankton production. p. 69–90.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter, S. R., N. F. Caraco, D. L. Correll, R. W. Howarth, A. N. Sharpley, andV. H. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen.Ecological Applications 8:559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Degobbis, D., M. Gilmartin, andN. Revelante. 1986. An annotated nitrogen budget calculation for the northern Adriatic Sea.Marine Chemistry 20:159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dillon, P. J. andF. H. Rigler. 1974. A test of a simple nutrient budget model predicting the phosphorus concentration in lake water.Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 31:1771–1778.Google Scholar
  10. Hendry, C. D. andP. L. Brezonik. 1980. Chemistry of precipitation at Gainesville, Florida.Environmental Science and Technology 14:843–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howaqrth, R. W.. 1988. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems, p. 89–110.In R. F. Johnston, P. W. Frank, and C. D. Michener (eds.), Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  12. Kelly, J. R. and B. L. Nowicki. 1992. Sediment Denitrification in Boston Harbor. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environment Quality Department Technical Report Series No. 92-2. Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Kemp, W. M., P. Sampou, J. Caffrey, M. Mayer, K. Henriksen, andW. R. Boynton. 1990. Ammonium recycling versus denitrification in Chesapeake Bay sediments.Limnology and Oceanography 35:1545–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larsson, U., R. Elmgren, andF. Wulff. 1985. Eutrophication and the Baltic Sea: Causes and consequences.Ambio 14:9–14.Google Scholar
  15. Lippson, A. J. (ed.). 1973. The Chesapeake Bay in Maryland: An Atlas of Natural Resources. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  16. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1985. National Estuarine Inventory, Data Atlas, Vol. 1: Physical and Hydrological Characteristics. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  17. Nielsen, K., L. P. Nielsen, andP. Rasmussen. 1995. Estuarine nitrogen retention indenendently estimated by the denitrification rate and mass balance methods: A study of Norsminde Fjord, Denmark.Marine Ecology Progres Series 119:275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nixon, S. W. 1983. Estuarine ecology-A comparative and experimental analysis using 14 estuaries and the MERL microcosms. Final report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program under Grant No. X-003259-01. The University of Rhode Island. Kingston, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  19. Nixon, S. W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns.Ophelia 41:199–219.Google Scholar
  20. Nixon, S. W., J. W. Ammerman, L. P. Atkinson, V. M. Berounsky, G. Billen, W. C. Boicourt, W. R. Boynton, T. M. Church, D. M. DiToro, R. Elmgren, J. H. Garber, A. E. Giblin, R. A. Jahnke, N. J. P. Owens, M. E. Q. Pilson, andS. P. Seitzinger. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean.Biogeochemistry 35:141–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nixon, S. W., S. L. Granger, andB. L. Nowicki. 1995. An assessment of the annual mass balance of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in Narragansett Bay.Biogeochemistry 31:15–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nixon, S. W., C. A. Oviatt, J. Frithsen, andB. Sullivan. 1986. Nutrients and the productivity of estuarine and coastal marine ecosystems.Journal of the Limnological Society of Southera Africa 12:43–71.Google Scholar
  23. Nowicki, B. L. 1994. The effect of temperature, oxygen, salinity, and nutrient enrichment on estuarine denitrification rates measured with a modified nitrogen gas flux technique.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 38:137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nowicki, B. L., J. R. Kelly, E. Requintina, andD. Van Keuren. 1997. Nitrogen losses through sediment denitrification in Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay.Estuaries 20:626–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oviatt, C., P. Doering, B. Nowicki, L. Reed, J. Cole, andJ. Frithsen. 1995. An ecosystem level experiment on nutrient limitation in temperature coastal marine environments.Marine Ecology Progress Series 116:171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oviatt, C. A., A. A. Keller, P. A. Sampou, andL. L. Beatty. 1986. Patterns of productivity during eutrophication: A mesocosm experiment.Marine Ecology Progress Series 28:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pelley, J. 1998. Is coastal eutrophication out of control?Environmental Science and Technology/News 32:462A-466A.Google Scholar
  28. Pilson, M. E. Q. 1985. On the residence time of water in Narragansett Bay.Estuaries 8:2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Polis, D. F. andS. L. Kupferman. 1973. Physical oceanography, p. 1–170.In D. F. Polis (ed.), Delaware Bay Report Series, Volume 4. College of Marine Studies, University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
  30. Seitzinger, S. P. 1987. Nitrogen biogeochemistry in an unpolluted estuary: The importance of benthic denitrification.Marine Ecology Progress Series 41:177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Signell, R. P. 1992. Tide- and wind-driven flushing of Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, p. 594–606.In M. L. Spaulding (ed.), Estuarine and Coastal Modeling, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Signell, R. P. andB. Butman. 1992. Modeling tidal exchange and dispersion in Boston Harbor.Journal of Geophysical Research 47:15591–15606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soetaert, K. andP. M. J. Herman. 1995a. Estimating estuarine residence times in the Westerschelde (The Netherlands) using a box model with fixed dispersion coefficients.Hydrobiologia 311:215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soetaert, K. andP. M. J. Herman. 1995b. Nitrogen dynamics in the Westerschelde estuary (SW Netherlands) estimated by means of the ecosystem model MOSES.Hydrobiologia 311:225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998a. National water quality inventory: 1996 Report to Congress. Report No. EPA 841-R-97-008. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998b. National strategy for the development of regional nutrient criteria. Report No. EPA-822-R-98-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Vitousek, P. M., J. D. Aber, R. W. Howarth, G. E. Likens, P. A. Matson, D. W. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, andD. G. Tilman. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences.Ecological Applications 7:737–750.Google Scholar
  38. Vollenweider, R. A. 1969. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen elementarer Modelle der Stoffbilanz von Seen (Possibilities and limits of elementary models concerning the budget of substances in lakes).Archiv für Hydrobiologie 66:1–36.Google Scholar
  39. Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-output models with special reference to the phosphorus loading concept in limnology.Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Hydrologie 37:53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vollenweider, R. A. 1976. Advances in defining critical laoding levels for phosphorus in lake eutrophication.Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia 33:53–83.Google Scholar
  41. Wulff, F. andA. Stigebrandt. 1989. A time-dependent budget model for nutrients in the Baltic Sea.Global Biogeochemical Cycles 3:63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sources of Unpublished Materials

  1. Boicourt, W. Personal Communication. Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland, P.O. Box 775, Cambridge, Maryland 21613.Google Scholar
  2. Brock, D. A. Personal Communication. Environmental Section, Texas Water Development Board, P.O. Box 13231, Austin, Texas 78711-3231.Google Scholar
  3. Brock, D. A., J. Matsumoto, and N. Boyd. Nitrogen budget and proposed minimal nitrogen requirement for the Guadalupe Estuary, Texas. Draft manuscript. Environmental Section, Texas Water Development Board, P.O. Box 13231, Austin, Texas 78711-3231.Google Scholar
  4. Jaworski, N. Personal Communication. E-mail: cjaworsk@ pegasus.cc.ucf.edu. Sanford, Florida (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, retired).Google Scholar
  5. Nielsen, K. Personal Communication. Ministry of Environment and Energy, National Environmental Research Institutes, Silkeborg, Denmark.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward H. Dettmann
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office, of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research LaboratoryNarrangansettAtlantic Ecology Division

Personalised recommendations