Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response of estuarine marsh vegetation to interannual variations in precipitation

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of deltaic emergent marsh vegetation to increases in precipitation was examined over a 14-mo period at three sites in the lower Nueces Estuary in south Texas. At all three sites, significant changes in plant biomass, percent cover, and allocation of aboveground and belowground tissues were associated with more than double the rainfall in late winter and early spring 1992 compared to the previous year and the 50-yr average for this region. Water column salinities, which ranged from 10‰ to 35‰ at all three sites in 1991, remained below 10‰ through August 1992. Significant changes in marsh vegetative structure included decreases in bare space, increases in the percent cover and aboveground biomass of a relatively less salt tolerant halophytes (Borrichia frutescens), and significant increases in root:shoot ratios inB. frutescens, Batis maritima andSuaeda linearis (inSalicornia virginica root:shoot ratios decreased significantly). Higher precipitation generally led to an overall increase in the biomass of most marsh perennials, but these increases were not statistically significant. For one species,Lycium carolinianum, additional rainfall extended its growing season through August 1992, 2 mo longer than in the previous year. The expansion (+58%) ofB. frutescens at one site was also coincident with the significant loss ofB. maritima, whose cover decreased nearly 20%. In an ecological context, these responses suggest that precipitation events in arid environments may be considered a major physical disturbance that can result in large changes in the composition and relative abundance of emergent vascular plants over a relatively short period. The long-term significance of these changes is unknown and demonstrates the value of ecological studies that are conducted over several years for a more complete understanding of the dynamic processes that regulate marsh productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D. A. 1963. Factors influencing vascular plant zonation in North Carolina salt marshes.Ecology 44:445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. D. 2000. Effects of soil salinity, inorganic nitrogen and freshwater inflow on the vegetation of a hypersaline salt marsh. M.S. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, N. E. 1987. The ecology of open-bay bottoms of Texas: A community profile. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, Biology Report 85:104, Washington, D.C.

  • Baumann, R., J. Day andC. Miller. 1984. Mississippi deltaic wetland survival; sedimentation vs. coastal submergence.Science 222:1093–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M. D. 1991. Interspecific interactions among high marsh perennials in a New England salt marsh.Ecology 72: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M. D. andA. M. Ellison. 1987. Determinants of pattern in a New England salt marsh plant community.Ecological Monographs 57:129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertness, M. D., L. Gough andS. W. Shumway. 1992. Salt tolerances and the distribution of fugitive salt marsh plants.Ecology 73:1842–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blom, C. W. P. M. andL. A. C. J. Voesenek. 1996. Flooding: The survival strategies of plants.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:290–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Reclamation. 2000. Concluding report: Rincon Bayou demonstration project. Volume I: Executive summary. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Oklahoma-Texas Area Office, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. D. andN. J. Hannon. 1970. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney district III. Plant growth in relation to salinity and waterlogging.Journal of Ecology 56:351–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • da Cunha Lana, P., C. Guiss, andS. T. Disaro. 1991. Seasonal variation of biomass and production dynamics for above and belowground components of aSpartina alterniflora marsh in the euhaline sector of Paranagua Bay (SE Brazil).Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 32:231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. andC. E. Johnson. 1991. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States, mid-1970’s to mid-1980’s. U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dame, R. F. andP. D. Kenny. 1986. Variability ofSpartina alterniflora primary production in the euhaline North Inlet estuary.Marine Ecology Press Series 32:71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espey, Huston andAssociates, Inc. 1977. Marsh plant production and potential detritus in Lavaca, San Antonio, and Nueces Bays. Document Number: 7688. Texas Department of Water Resources, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espey, Huston andAssociates, Inc. 1981. Nueces marsh development: A feasibility study of the introduction of river flows. Document #81328. Espey, Huston and Associates, Inc. Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. L. andF. G. Plumley. 1979. Underground biomass profiles and productivity in Atlantic coastal marshes.American Journal of Botany 66:156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. E., N. F. Good andB. R. Frasco. 1982. A review of primary production and decomposition dynamics of the belowground marsh component, p. 139–157.In V. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. F., M. A. Hardisky, andV. Klemas. 1990. Inter-annual spatial variability in the response ofSpartina alterniflora biomass to amount of precipitation.Journal of Coastal Research 6: 949–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. F., M. A. Hardisky, P. L. Wolf, andV. Klemas. 1991. Relationship between aboveground and belowground biomass ofSpartina alterniflora (smooth cordgrass).Estuaries 14: 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, S. D. andM. D. Bertness. 1995. Morphological and physiological consequences of a positive plant interaction.Ecology 76:2165–2175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, B. L. andE. L. Dunn. 1976. Growth and resource allocation response ofSpartina alterniflora Loisel to three levels of NH4-N, Fe, and NaCl in solution culture.Botany Gazette 137: 224–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, J. L., D. R. Cobos, F. A. Heinsch, C. S. Campbell, andK. J. McInnes. 1999. Tower-based conditional sampling for measuring ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide exchange in coastal wetlands.Estuaries 22:584–591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henningson, Durham and Richardson, Inc. and North Texas State University. 1978. Studies of freshwater needs of fish and wildlife resources in the Nueces-Corpus Christi Bay area, Texas. Technical Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin, Texas.

  • Kuhn, N. L. andJ. B. Zedler. 1997. Differential effects of salinity and soil saturation on native and exotic plants of a coastal salt marsh.Estuaries 20:391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-S. andK. H. Dunton. 1999. Inorganic nitrogen acquisition in the seagrassThalassia testudinum: Development of a whole-plant nitrogen budget.Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1204–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-S. andK. H. Dunton. 2000. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on biomass allocation, growth, and leaf morphology of the seagrassThalassia testudinum.Marine Ecology Progress Series 196:39–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, W. L. (ed.). 1994. Freshwater inflows to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, N. andT. Ross. 1997. U.S. monthly precipitation data for cooperative and NWS sites (station 412015, Corpus Christi International Airport). National Climatic Data Center Research Customer Service Group, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Asheville, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch, W. J. andJ. G. Gosselink. 1986. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, R. A. andJ. G. Paine. 1984. Historical shoreline changes in Corpus Christi, Oso and Nueces bays, Texas Gulf coast. Geological Circular 84-6. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, G. andS. G. Mundree. 1993. Relationship between morphological and physiological responses to waterlogging and salinity inSporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth.Oecologia 93: 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrondo, R. T., J. G. Gosselink, andC. S. Hopkinson. 1978. Effects of salinity and drainage on the growth of three small marsh grasses.Botanical Gazette 139:102–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. R., Y. Maita, andC. M. Lalli. 1984. A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy, R. W. andS. L. Ustin. 1984. Effects of salinity on growth and photosynthesis of three California tidal marsh species.Oecologia 62:68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezeshki, S. R., R. D. Delaune, andC. W. Lindau. 1988. Interaction among sediment anaerobiosis, nitrogen uptake and photosynthesis ofSpartina alterniflora.Physiologia Plantarum 74: 561–565.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, B. F. 1990. Establishment of estuarine faunal use in a salt marsh creation project, Nueces River Delta, Texas. CCSU-9001-CCS. Center for Coastal Studies, Corpus Christi State University, Corpus Christi, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1995. SAS Statistical Package. Version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, S. W. andM. D. Bertness. 1992. Salt stress limitation of seedling recruitment in a salt marsh plant community.Oecologia 92:490–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway, S. W. andM. D. Bertness. 1994. Patch size effects on marsh plant secondary succession mechanisms.Ecology 75: 564–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, R. M. andJ. W. Barko. 1980. Nitrogen nutrition and salinity tolerance ofDistichlis spicata andSpartina alterniflora.Ecology 61:630–638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solis, R. S. 1994. Patterns of inflow and salinity, p. 386:23–40.In W. L. Longley (ed.), Freshwater Inflows to Texas Bays and Estuaries: Ecological Relationships and Methods for Determination of Needs. Legislative Report by the Texas Water Development Board and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.

  • Tolley, P. M. andR. R. Christian. 1999. Effects of increased inudation and wrack deposition on a high salt marsh plant community.Estuaries 22:944–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiela, I., J. M. Teal, S. Volkman, D. Shafer, andE. J. Carpenter. 1978. Nutrients and particulate fluxes in a salt water march ecosystem: Tidal exchanges and inputs by precipitation and ground water.Limnology and Oceanography 23:798–812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tussenbroek, B. I. 1997. Above- and below-ground biomass and production byThalassia testudinum in a tropical reef lagoon.Aquatic Botany 61:69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Jr.,G. H. 1985. Marsh enhancement by freshwater diversion.Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 111:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weilhoefer, L. C. 1998. Effects of freshwater inflow, salinity and nutrients on salt marsh vegetation in south Texas. M.S. Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. A. andT. R. Calnan. 1990. Sedimentation and historical changes in fluvial-deltaic wetlands along the Texas Gulf coast with emphasis on the Colorado and Trinity river deltas. Report to Texas Parks and Wildlife Department by Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. A., T. R. Calnan, R. A. Morton, R. S. Kimble, T. G. Littleton, J. H. McGowen, H. S. Nance, andK. E. Schmedes. 1983. Submerged lands of Texas, Corpus Christi areas: Sediments, geochemistry, benthic macroinvertebrates, and associated wetlands. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. P. andW. M. Childress. 1981. Nutrient flux between the Nueces deltaic marsh and the Nueces estuary on the Texas Gulf Coast, p. 472–488.In R. D. Cross and D. L. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the National Wetlands Symposium on Freshwater Inflows to Estuaries. Biological Services Program. EWS/OBS-81-04. Department of Interior, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 1977. Salt marsh community structure in the Tijuana Estuary, California.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 5:39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. andP. A. Beare. 1986. Temporal variability of salt marsh vegetation: The role of low-salinity gaps and environmental stress, p. 295–306.In D. Wolfe (ed.), Estuarine Variability. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth H. Dunton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dunton, K.H., Hardegree, B. & Whitledge, T.E. Response of estuarine marsh vegetation to interannual variations in precipitation. Estuaries 24, 851–861 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/1353176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1353176

Keywords

Navigation