Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dispersion and recruitment of crab larvae in the Chesapeake Bay plume: Physical and biological controls

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As part of the Microbial Exchanges and Coupling in Coastal Atlantic Systems (MECCAS) Project, crab larvae were collected in the shelf waters off Chesapeake Bay in June and August 1985 and April 1986. We conducted hydrographic (temperature, salinity, nutrients) and biological (chlorophyll, copepods) mapping in conjunction with Eulerian and Lagrangian time studies of the vertical distribution of crab larvae in the Chesapeake Bay plume. These abundance estimates are used with current meter records and drifter trajectories to infer mechanisms of larval crab dispersion to the shelf waters and recruitment back into Chesapeake Bay. The highest numbers of crab larvae were usually associated with the Chesapeake Bay plume, suggesting that it was the dominant source of crab larvae to shelf waters. Patches of crab larvae also were found in the higher salinity shelf waters, and possibly were remnants of previous plume discharge events. The distribution of crab larvae in the shelf waters changed on 1–2 d time scales as a consequence of both variations in the discharge rate of the Chesapeake Bay plume and local wind-driven currents. Downwelling-favorable winds (NW) intensified the coastal jet and confined the plume and crab larvae along the coast. In April during a downwelling event (when northwesterly winds predominated), crab zoeae were transported southward along the coast at speeds that at times exceeded 168 km d−1. During June and August the upwelling-favorable winds (S, SW) opposed the anticyclonic turn of the plume and, via Ekman circulation, forced the plume and crab larvae to spread seaward. Plume velocities during these conditions generally were less than 48 km d−1. The recruitment of crab larvae to Chesapeake Bay is facilitated in late summer by the dominance of southerly winds, which can reverse the southward flow of shelf waters. Periodic downwelling-favorable winds can result in surface waters and crab larvae moving toward the entrance of Chesapeake Bay. Approximately 27% of the larval crabs spend at least part of the day in bottom waters, which have a residual drift toward the bay mouth. There appears to be a variety of physical transport mechanisms that can enhance the recruitment of crab larvae into Chesapeake Bay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Blanton, J., E. Wenner, F. Werner, andD. Knott. 1995. Effects of wind-generated coastal currents on the transport of blue crab megalopae on a shallow continental shelf.Bulletin of Marine Science 57:739–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boicourt, W. C. 1973. The circulation of water on the continental shelf from Chesapeake Bay to Cape Hatteras. Ph.D. Thesis, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boicourt, W. C. 1982. Estuarine larval retention mechanisms on two scales, p. 445–458.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boicourt, W. C., S.-Y. Chao, H. W. Ducklow, P. M. Glibert, T. C. Malone, M. R. Roman, L. P. Sanford, J. A. Fuhrman, C. Garside, andR. W. Garvine. 1987. Physics and microbial ecology of a buoyant estuarine plume on the continental shelf.EOS 68:666–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, S.-Y. andW. C. Boicourt. 1986. Onset of estuarine plumes.Journal of Physical Oceanography 16:2137–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, W.-S., andW. C. Boicourt. 1989. Resonant seiche motion in the Chesapeake Bay.Journal of Geophysical Research 94: 2105–2110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costlow, J. D., Jr. andC. G. Bookhout. 1959. The larval development ofCallinectes sapidus Rathbun reared in the laboratory.Biological Bulletin Marine Biology Laboratory 116:373–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, T. W., andR. B. Forward, Jr. 1982. Tidally timed behavior: Effects on larval distributions in estuaries, p. 505–520.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. 1985. Observations of coastal surface currents during CODE: The methods and observations.Journal of Geophysical Research 90:4741–4755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittel, A. I., andC. E. Epifanio. 1982. Seasonal abundance and vertical distribution of crab in Delaware Bay.Estuaries 5:197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epifanio, C. E. 1988. Transport of invertebrate larvae between estuaries and the continental shelf.American Fisheries Society Symposium 3:104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epifanio, C. E. 1996. Transport of blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) larvae in the waters off Mid-Atlantic States.Bulletin of Marine Science 57:713–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epifanio, C. E., C. C. Valenti, andA. E. Pembroke. 1984. Dispersal and recruitment of blue crab larvae in the Delaware Bay, USA.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 18:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, D. M., J. van Montfrans, andR. J. Orth. 1989. Blue crab megalopal influx to Chesapeake Bay: Evidence for a wind-driven mechanism.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 29: 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. F., andK. W. Hess. 1990. Numerical simulations of blue crab larval dispersal and recruitment.Bulletin of Marine Science 46:195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. 1985. Wind-forced dispersion of blue crab larvae in the Middle Atlantic Bight.Continental Shelf Research 4:733–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. 1995. Wind forced surface currents at the entrance to Chesapeake Bay: Their effect on blue crab larval dispersion and post-larval recruitment.Bulletin of Marine Science 57:726–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R., B. S. Hester, andJ. R. McConaucha 1984. Studies of a wind mechanism influencing the recruitment of blue crabs in the Middle Atlantic Bight.Continental Shelf Research 3(4):425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, K. T., andC. E. Epifanio. 1991. Mechanisms for the reinvasion of the estuary by two species of brachyuran megalopae.Marine Ecology Progress Series 68:235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lough, R. G. 1976. Larval dynamics of dungeness crab,Cancer magister, off the central Oregon coast 1969–71.Fisheries Bulletin 74:353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbach, M. W., andR. J. Orth. 1992. Swimming velocities and behavior of blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) megalopae in still and flowing water.Estuaries 15:186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConaugha, J. R., D. F. Johnson, A. J. Provenzano, andR. C. Maris. 1983. Seasonal distribution of larvae ofCallinectes sapidus (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the waters adjacent to Chesapeake Bay.Journal of Crustacean Biology 3:582–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmi, E. J. 1994. Vertical migration of blue crab,Callinectes sapidus, megalopae: Implications for recruitment.Marine Ecology Progress Series 113:39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, M. R., A. L. Gauzens, andT. J. Cowles. 1985. Temporal and spatial changes in epipelagic microzooplankton and mesozooplankton biomass in warm-core Gulf Stream ring 82-B.Deep-Sea Research 32(9):1007–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, M. R., C. S. Yentsch, A. L. Gauzens, andD. A. Phinney. 1986. Grazer control of the fine-scale distribution of phytoplankton in warm-core Gulf Stream rings.Journal of Marine Research 44:795–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandifer, P. A. 1972. Morphology and ecology of Chesapeake Bay decapod crustacean larvae. Doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandifer, P. A. 1973. Distribution and abundance of decapod crustacean larvae in the York River estuary and adjacent lower Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, 1968–1969.Chesapeake Science 14: 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, P. O. 1980.Callinectes (Decapoda: Portunidae) larvae in the Middle Atlantic Bight, 1975–1977.Fisheries Bulletin 78:251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathman, R. R. 1982. Selection for retention or export of larvae in estuaries. p. 521–536.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkin, S. D. and C. E. Epifanio. 1986. A conceptual model for recruitment of the blue crab,Callinectes sapidus Rathbun, to estuaries in the Middle Atlantic Bight, p. 177–223.In G. S. Jamieson and N. Bourne (eds.), North Pacific Workshop of Stock Assessment and Management of the Invertebrates.Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 92: 177–223.

  • Sulkin, S. D., andW. Van Heukelem. 1982. Larval recruitment in the crabCallinectes sapidus Rathbun: An amendment to the concept of larval retention in estuaries, p. 459–475.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Source of Unpublished Material

  • United States Geological Survey. Unpublished Data. United States Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Reston, Virginia.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, P. O. Box 775, 21613, Cambridge, Maryland

    Michael R. Roman & William C. Boicourt

Authors
  1. Michael R. Roman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William C. Boicourt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Roman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roman, M.R., Boicourt, W.C. Dispersion and recruitment of crab larvae in the Chesapeake Bay plume: Physical and biological controls. Estuaries 22, 563–574 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/1353044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1353044

Keywords

Search

Navigation