Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recent sedimentary development of Tampa Bay, Florida: A microtidal estuary incised into tertiary platform carbonates

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tampa Bay, a large, microtidal, clastic-filled estuary incised into Tertiary carbonate strata, is the largest estuary on Florida’s west coast. A total of 250 surface sediment samples and 17 cores were collected in Tampa Bay in order to determine the patterns and controlling factors governing the recent infilling and modern sediment distribution, and to examine the results in terms of current models of estuarine sedimentation and development. Surficial sediments in Tampa Bay consist of three facies types, each occurring in a distinct zone: modern terrigenous clastic muds occurring in the upper bay and around the bay periphery; relict, reworked-fluvial, quartz-rich sands occupying the open portion of the middle bay; and modern carbonate-rich, marine-derived sands and gravels occupying the lower bay. Factors controlling sediment distribution include: sediment source and supply rate; bathymetry, which is a function of the antecedent topography; and the winnowing effect of wind-generated waves that prohibits modern accumulation in the shallow middle bay. These factors also play a major role in the recent infilling history of Tampa Bay, which has progressed in four stages during the Holocene sea-level rise. Recently developed models of estuarine sedimentation are based primarily on mesotidal to macrotidal estuaries in terrigenous clastic settings in which sedimentation patterns and infilling history are a result of the relative contribution of marine and fluvial processes. Tampa Bay differs in that it was originally incised into carbonate strata, and neither fluvial or marine processes are interpreted to be major contributors to modern sediment distribution. Tampa Bay, therefore, provides an example of an unusual estuary type, which should be considered in future modeling efforts. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A01BY083 00004

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature cited

  • Allen, G. P. andH. W. Posamentier. 1993. Sequence stratigraphy and facies model of an incised valley fill: The Gironde Estuary, France.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62:378–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, G. M. and R. E. Sheridan. 1994. Depositional model for valley fills on a passive continental margin, p. 285–301.In R. W. Dalrymple, R. Boyd, and B. A. Zaitlin (eds.), Incised-Valley Systems: Origin and Sedimentary Sequences. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 51. Tulsa, Oklahoma.

  • Boyd, R. andC. Honig. 1992. Estuarine sedimentation on the eastern shore of Nova Scotia.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62:569–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, G. R. and L. J. Doyle. 1989. Recent Geological History of Mud-Dominated Sediments in Hillsborough Bay, Florida. Final Report to City of Tampa, Florida.

  • Brooks, G. R. and L. J. Doyle. 1991. Distribution of sediments and sedimentary contaminants in Tampa Bay, p. 399–414.In S. F. Treat and P. A. Clark (eds.), Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium 2, TEXT Tampa, Florida.

  • Brooks, G. R., L. J. Doyle, and N. T. DeWitt. In Press. Surface sediment characteristics and distribution patterns: Inner west Florida continental shelf. United States Geological Survey Open File Report, St. Petersburg, Florida.

  • Brooks, G. R., L. J. Doyle, J. O. R. Johansson, A. P. Squires, H. D. Zsoldos, andR. H. Byrne. 1991. Distribution patterns and accumulation rates of fine-grained sediments in upper Tampa Bay, Florida.Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, Transactions 41:60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, S. M., J. P. Halka, and C. H. Hobbs, III. 1992. Patterns and rates of sediment accumulation in the Chesapeake Bay during the Holocene rise in sea level, p. 101–111.In C. H. Fletcher and J. F. Wehmiller (eds.), Quaternary Coasts of the United States: Marine and Lacustrine Systems. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 48. Tulsa, Oklahoma.

  • Cote, D. H. 1973. Applications of computer modelling techniques to determine hydraulic characteristics of Tampa Bay. Masters Thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, R. W., R. Boyd, and B. A. Zaitlin. 1994. History of research, types and internal organization of incised valley systems: Introduction to the volume, p. 3–10.In R. W. Dalrymple, R. Boyd, and B. A. Zaitlin (eds.), Incised-Valley Systems: Origin and Sedimentary Sequences. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 51. Tulsa, Oklahoma.

  • Dalrymple, R. W., B. A. Zaitlin, andR. Boyd. 1992. Estuarine facies models: Conceptual basis and stratigraphic implications.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 62:1130–1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. A. 1992. Depositional Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, W. E. 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: Comparison with other methods.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 44m:242–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, L. J. 1975. Economic Geology of Shell Deposits of Tampa Bay, Florida. IX Congress International de Sedimentologie, Nice, France.

  • Doyle, L. J., E. S. Van Vleet, W. M. Sackett, N. J. Blake, and G. R. Brooks. 1985. Hydrocarbon Levels in Tampa Bay. Final Report submitted to the Florida Department of Natural Resources, St. Petersburg, Florida.

  • Duncan, D. S. 1993. Neogene to recent seismic stratigraphy of the lower Tampa Bay estuary: West-central Florida. University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. W., A. C. Hine, andD. F. Belknap. 1989. Quaternary stratigraphy of the Charlotte Harbor estuary-lagoon system, southwest Florida: Implications of the carbonate-siliciclastic transition,Marine Geology 88:319–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R. L. 1965. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphills, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. W. andJ. D. Howard. 1986. Mesotidal estuarine sequences: A perspective from the Georgia Bight.Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 56:911–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, B., A. F. Blumberg, and R. H. Weisberg. 1991. A time-dependent three-dimensional model of circulation in Tampa Bay, p. 77–97.In S. F. Treat and P. A. Clark (eds.), Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium 2, Tampa, Florida.

  • Goodell, H. G. andD. S. Gorsline. 1961. A sedimentologic study of Tampa Bay, Florida, p. 75–88. 21st International Geological Congress. Florida State University Oceanographic Institute, Tallahassee, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. R. 1984. Changes in tidal flow, circulation and flushing caused by dredge and fill in Tampa Bay, Florida. United States Geological Survey Open File Report 84-447, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Goodwin, C. R. 1989. Circulation of Tampa and Sarasota bays, p. 49–64.In E. Estevez (ed.), Tampa and Sarasota Bays: Issues, Resources, Status, and Management. NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Series No. 11, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. R. and D. M. Michaelis. 1976. Tides in Tampa Bay, Florida: June 1971 to December 1973. United States Geological Survey Open File Report FL75004, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Hess, K. W. 1994. Tampa Bay oceanography project: Development and application of the numerical circulation model. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Report NOS OES 005, Silver Spring, Maryland.

  • Hine, A. C. 1997. Structural, stratigraphic, and paleoceanographic development of the margins of the Florida Platform, p. 169–194.In A. F. Randazzo and D. S. Jones (eds.), Geology of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, A. C. andS. W. Snyder. 1985. Coastal lithosome preservation: Evidence from the shoreface and inner continental shelf off Bogue Banks, North Carolina.Marine Geology 63:307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isphording, W. C., F. D. Imsand, andG. C. Flowers. 1989. Physical characteristics and aging of Gulf coast estuaries.Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, Transactions 39:387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, J. O. R. andA. P. Squires. 1989. Surface sediments and their relationship to water quality in Hillsborough Bay, a highly impacted subdivision of Tampa Bay, Florida, p. 129–143.In E. Estevez (ed.), Tampa and Sarasota Bays: Issues, Resources, Status, and Management: NOAA Estuary-of-the-Month Series No. 11, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindinger, J. L., P. S. Balson, and J. G. Flocks. 1994. Stratigraphy of the Mississippi-Alabama shelf and the Mobile River incised valley system, p. 83–95.In R. W. Dalrymple, R. Boyd, and B. A. Zaitlin (eds.), Incised-Valley Systems: Origin and Sedimentary Sequences. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 51. Tulsa, Oklahoma.

  • Knebel, H. J., C. H. Fletcher, andJ. C. Kraft. 1988. Late Wisconsinan-Holocene paleogeography of Delaware Bay; a large coastal plain estuary.Marine Geology 83:115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, V. A. and D. H. Schoellhamer. 1995. Summary of sediment resuspension monitoring activities, Old Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Bay, Florida, 1988–1991. United States Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 94-4081. Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Lewis, R. R., III and E. D. Estevez. 1988. The ecology of Tampa Bay, Florida: An estuarine profile. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 85 (7.18). Washington, D.C.

  • Milliman, J. D. 1974. Marine Carbonates. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. M. andR. B. Biggs. 1985. Estuaries, p. 77–186.In R. A. Davies Jr. (ed.), Coastal Sedimentary Environments. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, M. M., G. H. Johnson, andP. C. Peebles. 1991. Modern sediments and facies model for a microtidal coastal plain estuary, the James Estuary, Virginia,Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 61:883–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penland, S. andJ. R. Suter. 1983. Transgressive coastal facies preserved in barrier island arc retreat paths in the Mississippi River delta plain.Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, Transactions 33:367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinson, G. E. 1992. Transgressive barrier island and estuarine systems, p. 179–194.In R. G. Walker and N. P. James (eds.), Facies Models. Geological Association of Canada, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. E. 1973. The hydrology and flushing of the bays, estuaries, and nearshore areas of the eastern Gulf of Mexico, p. IID1-IID45.In J. I. Jones (ed.), A Summary of Knowledge of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico, State University System, Florida Institute of Oceanography, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, W., G. R. Brooks, M. Conkright, L. J. Doyle, andL. Yarbro. 1986. Stable isotope compositions of sedimentary organic carbon in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA: Implications for evaluating oil contamination.Applied Geochemistry 1:131–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schubel, J. R. andD. J. Hirschberg. 1978. Estuarine graveyard and climatic change.Estuarine Processes 1:285–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoellhamer, D. H. 1995. Sediment resuspension mechanisms in Old Tampa Bay, Florida,Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 40:603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. M. 1988. The lithostratigraphy of the Hawthorne Group (Miocene) of Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 59, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Smith, D. L. andK. M. Lord. 1997. Tectonic evolution and geophysics of the Florida basement, p. 13–26.In A. F. Randazzo and D. S. Jones (eds.), Geology of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, L. E. 1970. The Marine Geology of Tampa Bay. Masters Thesis. Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. O. 1951. Geology of Citrus and Levy counties. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 33, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Weisberg, R. H. and R. G. Williams. 1991. Initial findings on the circulation of Tampa Bay, p. 49–66.In S. F. Treat and P. A. Clark (eds.), Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium 2, Tampa, Florida.

  • Willis, J. W. 1984. The shallow structure of Tampa Bay. Masters Thesis. University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaitlin, B. A., R. W. Dalrymple, and R. Boyd. 1994. The stratigraphic organization of incised-valley systems associated with relative sea-level change, p. 45–60.In R. W. Dalrymple, R. Boyd, and B. A. Zaitlin (eds.), Incised-Valley Systems: Origin and Sedimentary Sequences. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 51. Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregg R. Brooks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brooks, G.R., Doyle, L.J. Recent sedimentary development of Tampa Bay, Florida: A microtidal estuary incised into tertiary platform carbonates. Estuaries 21, 391–406 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352838

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352838

Keywords

Navigation