, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 379–389 | Cite as

Composition, abundance, biomass, and production of macrofauna in a New England estuary: Comparisons among eelgrass meadows and other nursery habitats

  • K. L. Heck
  • K. W. Able
  • C. T. Roman
  • M. P. Fahay


Quantitative suction sampling was used to characterize and compare the species composition, abundance, biomass, and secondary production of macrofauna inhabiting intertidal mud-flat and sand-flat, eelgrass meadow, and salt-marsh-pool habitats in the Nauset Marsh complex, Cape Cod, Massachusetts (USA). Species richness and abundance were often greatest in eelgrass habitat, as was macroinvertebrate biomass and production. Most striking was the five to fifteen times greater rate of annual macrofaunal production in eelgrass habitat than elsewhere, with values ranging from approximately 23–139 g AFDW m2 yr−1. The marsh pool containing widgeon grass (Ruppia maritima) supported surprisingly low numbers of macroinvertebrates, probably due to stressfully low dissolved oxygen levels at night during the summer. Two species of macroinvertebrates, blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and to a lesser extent bay scallops (Argopecten irradians), used eelgrass as “nursery habitat.” Calculations showed that macroinvertebrate production is proportionally much greater than the amount of primary production attributable to eelgrass in the Nauset Marsh system, and that dramatic changes at all trophic levels could be expected if large changes in seagrass abundance should occur. This work further underscores the extraordinarily large impact that seagrass can have on both the structure and function of estuarine ecosystems. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A01BY070 00006


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Asmus, H. 1987. Secondary production of an intertidal mussel bed community related to its storage and turnover compartments. Marine Ecology Progress Series 39:251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baden, S. P. and L. Pihl. 1984. Abundance, biomass and production of mobile epibenthic fauna in Zostera marina (L.) meadows, western Sweden. Ophelia 23:65–90.Google Scholar
  3. Choat, J. H. and D. R. Schiel. 1982. Patterns of distribution and abundance of large brown algae and invertebrate herbivores in subtidal regions of northern New Zealand. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 60:129–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christian, R. R. 1981. Community metabolism of a salt-water pothole. Bulletin of New Jersey Academy of Science 26:34–40.Google Scholar
  5. Croker, R. A. 1977. Macro-infauna of northern New England marine sand: Long-term intertidal community structure, p. 439–450. In B. C. Coull (ed.), Ecology of the Marine Benthos. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  6. Dayton, P. K. 1985. Ecology of kelp communities. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics 16:215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobbs, R. C. 1981. Community ecology of a shallow subtidal sand flat with emphasis on sediment reworking by Clymenella torquata (Polychaeta: Maldanidae). M.S. Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  8. Fredette, T. J. and R. J. Diaz. 1986. Secondary production of Gammarus mucronatus Say (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) in warm temperate estuarine habitats, York River, Virginia. Journal of Crustacean Biology 6:57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fredette, T. J., R. J. Diaz, J. van Montfrans, and R. J. Orth. 1990. Secondary production within a seagrass bed (Zostera marina and Ruppia maritima) in lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13:431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gardner, J. P. A. and M. L. H. Thomas. 1987. Growth, mortality and production of organic matter by a rocky intertidal population of Mytilus edulis in the Quoddy Region of the Bay of Fundy. Marine Ecology Progress Series 39:31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heck, K. L.., Jr. 1987. Benthos, p. 97–110. In K. L. Heck, Jr. (ed.). Ecological Studies in the Middle Reach of Chesapeake Bay. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Heck, K. L., Jr., K. W. Able, M. P. Fahay, and C. T. Roman. 1989. Fishes and decapod crustaceans of Cape Cod eelgrass meadows: Species composition, seasonal abundance patterns and comparison with unvegetated substrates. Estuaries 12:59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hibbert, C. J. 1976. Biomass and production of a bivalve community on an intertidal mud-flat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 25:249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holland, A. F., A. T. Shaughnessy, and M. T. Hiegel. 1987. Long-term variation in mesohaline Chesapeake Bay macrobenthos: Spatial and temporal patterns. Estuaries 10:227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalejta, B. and P. A. R. Hockey. 1991. Distribution, abundances and productivity of benthic invertebrates at the Berg River Estuary, South Africa. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 33: 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCall, P. L. 1977. Community patterns and adaptive strategies of the infaunal benthos of Long Island Sound. Journal of Marine Research 35:221–266.Google Scholar
  17. Möller, P., L. Pihl, and R. Rosenberg. 1985. Benthic faunal energy flow and biological interaction in some shallow marine soft bottom habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 27:109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Möller, P. and R. Rosenberg. 1982. Production and abundance of the amphipod Corophium volutator on the west coast of Sweden. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16:127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moller, P. and R. Rosenberg. 1983. Recruitment, abundance, and production of Mya arenaria and Cardium edule in marine shallow waters, western Sweden. Ophelia 22:33–55.Google Scholar
  20. Muehlstein, L. K., D. Porter, and F. T. Short. 1991. Labryrinthula zosterae sp-nov., the causative agent of wasting disease of eelgrass, Zostera marina. Mycologia 83:180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagle, J. S. 1968. Distribution of the epibiota of macroepibenthic plants. Contributions in Marine Science 13:105–144.Google Scholar
  22. Nichols, F. H. 1977. Infaunal biomass and production on a mud flat, San Francisco Bay, California, p. 339–357. In B. C. Coull (ed.), Ecology of Marine Benthos. University of South Carolina Press. Columbia, South Carolina.Google Scholar
  23. Orth, R. J., K. L. Heck, Jr., and J. van Montfrans. 1984. Faunal relationships in seagrass beds: A review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics. Estuaries 7:339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Orth, R. J. and J. van Montfrans. 1987. Utilization of a seagrass meadow and tidal marsh creek by blue crabs. Callinectes sapidus. I. Seasonal and annual variations in abundance with emphasis on post-settlement juveniles. Marine Ecology Progress Series 41:283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pihl, L. 1985. Food selection and consumption of mobile epibenthic fauna in shallow marine areas. Marine Ecology Progress Series 22:169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pihl, L. 1986. Exposure, vegetation, and sediment as primary factors for mobile epibenthic faunal community structure and production in shallow marine soft bottom areas. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 20:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pihl, L. and R. Rosenberg. 1982. Production, abundance, and biomass of mobile epibenthic marine fauna in shallow waters, western Sweden. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 57:273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pihl, L. and R. Rosenberg. 1984. Food selection and consumption of the shrimp Crangon crangon in some shallow marine areas in western Sweden. Marine Ecology Progress Series 15: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rhoads, D. C. and D. K. Young. 1970. The influence of deposit-feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. Journal of Marine Research 28:150–178.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson, A. I. 1979. The relationship between annual production: Biomass and ratios and life spans for marine macrobenthos. Oecologia 38:193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roman, C. T. and K. W. Able. 1988. Production ecology of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in a Cape Cod salt marsh-estuarine system, Massachusetts. Aquatic Botany 32:353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roman, C. T., K. W. Able, M. A. Lazzari, and K. L. Heck, Jr. 1990. Primary productivity of angiosperm and macroalgae dominated habitats in a New England salt marsh: A comparative analysis. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 30:35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanders, H. L. 1958. Benthic studies of Buzzards Bay: I. Animal-sediment relationships. Limnology and Oceanography 3:245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Short, F. T., L. K. Muehlstein, and D. Porter. 1987. Eelgrass wasting disease: Cause and recurrence of a marine epidemic. Biological Bulletin 173:557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, K. J. and K. W. Able. 1994. Salt marsh tide pools as winter refuges for the mummichog, Funduls heteroclitus, in New Jersey estuaries. Estuaries 17:226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steimle, F. W., Jr. 1985. Biomass and estimated productivity of the benthic macrofauna in the New York Bight: A stressed coastal area. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Science 21:539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steimle, F. W., Jr. and J. Caracciolo-Ward. 1989. A reassessment of the status of the benthic macrofauna of the Raritan Estuary. Estuaries 12:145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thayer, G. W., W. J. Kenworthy, and M. S. Fonseca. 1984. The ecology of eelgrass meadows of the Atlantic coast: A community profile. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/ OBS84/02.Google Scholar
  39. Valentine, J. F. and K. L. Heck, Jr. 1993. Mussels in seagrass meadows: Their influence on macroinvertebrate abundance and secondary production in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 96:63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warwick, R. M. and R. Price. 1975. Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud flat. Journal of the Marine Biology Association United Kingdom 55:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitlatch, R. B. 1977. Seasonal changes in the community structure of the macrobenthos inhabiting the intertidal sand and mud flats of Barnstable Harbor, Massachusetts. Biological Bulletin 152:275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitlatch, R. B. 1982. The ecology of New England tidal flats: A community profile. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-81/01.Google Scholar
  43. Zieman, J. C. 1982. The ecology of the seagrasses of south Florida: A community profile. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS/82-25.Google Scholar
  44. Zieman, J. C. and R. T. Zieman. 1989. The ecology of the seagrass meadows of the west coast of Florida: A community profile. United States Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report. 85(7.25).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. L. Heck
    • 1
  • K. W. Able
    • 2
  • C. T. Roman
    • 3
  • M. P. Fahay
    • 4
  1. 1.Marine Environmental Sciences ConsortiumUniversity of South AlabamaDauphin Island
  2. 2.Marine Field Station Institute of Marine and Coastal SciencesRutgers UniversityTuckerton
  3. 3.National Park Service Coastal Research CenterUniversity of Rhode IslandNarragansett
  4. 4.National Marine Fisheries ServicesSandy Hook LaboratoryHighlands

Personalised recommendations