Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental impacts of shrimp farming with special reference to the situation in the continental United States

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shrimp culture technology has resulted in development of a major shrimp farming industry worldwide. Without the shrimp farming industry, increasing demands for shrimp by consumers could not be met, resulting in increased pressure on wild shrimp resources. Unfortunately, there are realized and potential adverse environmental effects on estuarine ecosystems as a result of shrimp farming. The effects can be categorized as wetland destruction for construction of shrimp farms, hypernutrification of estuarine ecosystems by shrim pond effluent, “biological pollution” of native shrimp stocks through escapement of aquaculture stocks, water use and entrainment of estuarine biota, and impacts of shrimp farm chemicals on estuarine systems. While the shrimp farming industry in the United States is small, the United States is effectively addressing all the realized and potential environmental impacts through regulation and research at the federal and state levels. Areas of regulation and research include stringent prohibitions on wetland destruction, regulation of effluents and support of research to eliminate and/or reduce effluents, escapement prevention technology and development of high-health stocks, minimizing entrainment of estuarine biota through water conservation and screening technology, and regulation of chemical use in the shrimp farming industry and support of research on shrimp pathology and environmentally safe disease control. Work is still in progress and not all problems have been resolved to the complete satisfaction of shrimp farmers and estuarine conservationists. However, the situation in the United States should serve as a model of how to encourage sustainable economic development through commercial shrimp farming while abating adverse environmental impacts on estuarine systems. To further improve the situation, the development and adoption of “best management practices” for shrimp aquaculture are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Aiken, D. 1990. Shrimp farming in Ecuador: An aquaculture success story.World Aquaculture 21:7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1991a. FDA adopts tough new policy on use of drugs in aquaculture.Water Farming Journal 6:4–6.

  • Anonymous. 1991b. Aquaculture: Water Quality and the Environment. Proceedings of conference sponsored by Cooperative State Research Service, United State Department of Agriculture, Massachusetts Centers of Excellence, the Spring and Groundwater Research Institute, the Oceanic Institute, the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, the United States Soil Conservation Service, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

  • Aquacop 1984. Ten years of experimental rearing of Penaeid shrimp in Tahiti and New Caledonia (South Pacific), p. 446–477.In Aquaculture en Milieu Tropical. AQUACOP IFREMER Service Documentation Publications, Brest Cedex, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnthouse, L. W., J. Boreman, S. W. Christensen, C. P. Goodyear, W. Van Winkle, andD. S. Vaughn. 1984. Population biology in the courtroom: The Hudson River controversy.Bioscience 34:14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T. A. 1991. The treatment of Texas Pond Mortality Syndrome (TPMS) with oxytetracycline-medicated feeds: 1990 field trial results. p. 18. Program and Abstracts, 22nd Annual Conference. World Aquaculture Society. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, T. A. 1992. Principles of shrimp culture chemotherapy, p. 227–237.In J. A. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, M. C. M., M. J. Phillips, andR. M. Clarke. 1991. A quantitative assessment of wastes from aquatic animal production, p. 506–533.In D. E. Brune and J. R. Tomasso (eds.), Aquaculture and Water Quality. Advances in World Aquaculture, Volume 3. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonyaratpalin, S. 1990. Shrimp larval diseases, p. 158–167.In M. B. New, H. de Saram., and T. Singh (eds.), Technical and Economic Aspects of Shrimp Farming. Proceedings of the Aquatec '90 Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Boreman, J., C. P. Goodyear, andS. W. Christensen. 1981. An empirical methodology for estimating entrainment at power plants sited on estuaries.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 110:255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, C. E. andY. Musig. 1992. Shrimp pond effluents: Observations of the nature of the problem on commercial farms, p. 195–197.In J. A. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, W. A. andA. L. Lawrence 1992. Reproduction ofPenaeus species in captivity, p. 93–170.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.), Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, W. A., A. L. Lawrence, J. L. Lester, andL. L. Smith. 1990. Hybridization, ofPenaeus setiferus andPenaeus schmitti.Journal of Crustacean Biology 10:278–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browdy, C. L. 1992. A review of the reproductive biology of Penaeus species: Perspective on controlled shrimp maturation systems for high quality nauplii production, p. 22–51.In J. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browdy, C. L., A. D. Stokes, J. S. Hopkins, andP. A. Sandifer. 1991. Evaluation of intensive pond mono- and polyculture ofP. setiferus andP. vannamei in South Carolina.Journal of World Mariculture Society 22:16A (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, D. E. 1990. Reducing the environmental impact of shrimp pond discharge. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Paper Number 90-7036, St. Joseph, Missouri.

  • Burrell, V. G., J. Sample, C. Batey, andM. Y. Bobo. 1991. Concentration ofVibrio vulnificus in oysters,Crassotrea virginica, growth in ponds with Pacific white shrimp,Penaeus vannamei.Journal of Shellfish Research 10:227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, J. T. 1992. An international perspective on species introduction: The ICES protocol, p. 31–33.In M. R. Devoe (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference and Workshop: Introductions and Transfers of Marine Species—Achieving a Balance Between Economic Development and Resource Protection. South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium, Charleston, South Carolina.

  • Carpenter, N. 1992. Disease diagnosis and management: An industry report, p. 261–265.In J. A. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATOMA (Committee on Assessment of Technology and Opportunities for Marine Aquaculture in the United States). 1992. Marine Aquaculture: Opportunities for Growth. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. W. 1991. Shrimp farming in Indonesia: I—Growout techniques.World Aquaculture 22:12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, P. andI. C. Liao. 1985. The practice of grass prawn (Penaeus monodon) culture in Taiwan from 1968 to 1984.Journal World Mariculture Society 16:297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. C. andW. Brownwell. 1973. Electric Power Plants in the Coastal Zone. Special Publication 7, American Littoral Society, Highland, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, H. C. 1985. Semi-intensive shrimp farming, p. IV15-IV42.In G. W. Chamberlain (ed.), Texas Shrimp Farming Manual. Publication of invited papers presented at the Texas Shrimp Farming Workshop on 19–20 November, 1985. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Corpus Christi, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorni, A., T. Samocha, andB. Colorni. 1987. Pathogenic viruses introduced into Israeli mariculture systems by imported penaeid shrimp.BAMDGEH 39:21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csavas, I. 1990. Shrimp aquaculture developments in Asia, p. 207–222.In M. B. New, H. de Saram, and T. Singh (eds.), Technical and Economic Aspects of Shrimp Farming. Proceedings of the Aquatec '90 Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Fast, A. W. 1992. Penaeid growout systems: An overview, p. 345–354.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.), Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodyear, C. P. 1977. Mathematical methods to evaluate entrainment of aquatic organisms by power plants. Prepared for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Washington, D.C.

  • Hightower, M. andG. Treece. 1992. Non-native marine shrimp culture in Texas: Background, issues and regulatory response, p. 191–196.In M. R. DeVoe (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference and Workshop on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Species: Achieving a Balance Between Resource Protection and Economic Development. South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium, Charleston, South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. F., S. B. Weisberg, J. K. Summers, L. R. Cadman, and J. M. Hoenig. 1986. Technical review and evaluation of thermal effects studies and cooling water intake demonstration of impact for the Salem nuclear generating station. Prepared for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, New Jersey.

  • Holmberg, N. 1988. Protection as a form of management for estuarine wetlands: The section 404 regulatory program and its impacts on estuarine wetlands, p. 45–49.In D. D. Hook (ed.), The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Volume 2: Management, Use and Value of Wetlands. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S. 1986. Shrimp farming in Taiwan.Aquaculture Digest 11:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S. 1991. Status and history of marine and freshwater shrimp farming in South Carolina and Florida, p. 17–35.In P. A. Sandifer (ed.), Shrimp Culture in North America and the Caribbean. World Aquaculture Society. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S. 1992. Shrimp culture in the United States. p. 817–837.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.), Culture of Marine Shrimp: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S. 1994. An apparatus for continuous removal of sludge and foam fractions in intensive shrimp ponds. Submitted toProgressive Fish Culturist 56:135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S., M. L. Baird, O. P. Grados, P. P. Maier, P. A. Sandifer, andA. D. Stokes. 1988. Impacts of intensive shrimp production on the culture pond ecosystem.Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 19:37A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S., C. L. Browdy, R. D. Hamilton, andJ. A. Heffernan. 1995. The effect of low-rate sand filtration coupled with careful feed management on effluent quality, pond water quality, and production of intensive shrimp ponds.Estuaries 18:116–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S., R. D. Hamilton, P. A. Sandifer, C. L. Browdy, andA. D. Stokes. 1993. Effect of water exchange rates on production, water quality, effluent characteristics, and nitrogen budgets of intensive shrimp ponds.Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 24:304–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S., P. A. Sandifer, R. D. Hamilton, andC. L. Browdy. 1994. Sludge management in intensive pond culture of shrimp: Effect of management regime on water quality, sludge characteristics, nitrogen extinction, and shrimp production.Aquacultural Engineering 13:11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, J. S., P. A. Sandifer, A. D. Stokes, and C. L. Browdy. 1991. The effect of minimal water exchange on the water quality and production of intensive marine shrimp ponds, p. 33. Program and Abstracts, 22nd Annual Conference, World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

  • Hopkins, J. S. andJ. Villalón. 1992. Synopsis of industrial panel input on shrimp pond management,In J. A. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. L. 1982. Impact of a once-through cooling system on the yellow perch stock in the western basin of Lake Erie.Ecological Modeling 15:127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C. F., J. D. Whitaker, andF. S. Lee. 1989. Model for white shrimp landings for the central coast of South Carolina.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A. L., W. A. Bray, J. S. Wilkenfeld, andL. J. Lester. 1984. Successful interspecific cross of two species of marine shrimp,Penaeus stylirostris × Penaeus setiferus p. 39. Abstracts and Program, 15th Annual Conference. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. O'C. andJ. F. Wickins. 1992. Crustacean Farming. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. J. 1983. Developing a selective breeding program for penaeid shrimp mariculture.Aquaculture 33:41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, L. J. andM. J. R. Pante. 1992. Genetics ofPenaeus species, p. 29–52.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.), Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, I-C. 1992. Marine prawn culture industry of Taiwan, p. 653–675.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.), Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightner, D. V. 1992. Shrimp virus diseases: Diagnosis, distribution and management, p. 238–253.In J. A. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightner, D. V., R. M. Redman, T. A. Bell, andR. B. Thurman. 1991. Geographic dispersion of the viruses IHHN, MBV, and HPV as a consequence of transfers and introductions of penaeid shrimp to new regions for aquaculture purposes, p. 133–158.In A. Rosenfield and R. Mann (eds.), A Symposium on Human Influences on Aquatic Ecosystems, Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M-N., Y-Y. Ting, andI. Hanyu. 1988. Hybridization of two closed-thelycum penaeid speciesPenaeus monodon × P. penicellatus andP. penicellatus × P. monodon by means of spermatophore transplantation.Bulletin of the Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 45:83–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. Y., Y. H. Cui, F. S. Xu, andJ. H. Xiang. 1991. Recruitment and stock enhancement of the Chinese shrimp,Penaeus orientalis. Proceedings of the 1990 International Crustacean Conference.Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 31:454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, J. M. and R. M. Overstreet. 1991. Occurrence of IHHN virus in penaeid shrimp from wild populations of the eastern Pacific Ocean, p. 40. Program and Abstracts, 22nd Annual Conference, World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

  • Lunz, G. R. 1958. Pond cultivation of shrimp in South Carolina.Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 10:44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunz, G. R. andC. M. Bearden. 1963. Control of predaceous fishes in shrimp farming in South Carolina. Bears Bluff Laboratories Inc. Contribution (36):96. Wadmalaw Island, South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, P. P. 1991. Temporal variation of chlorophyll-a concentration, zooplankton density, and zooplankton species composition in ponds stocked withPenaeus vannamei at three population densities. M.S. Thesis, College of Charleston, Charleston, South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVey, J. P. 1988. Aquaculture in mangrove wetlands: A perspective from Southeast Asia, p. 303–515.In D. D. Hook (ed.), The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Volume 2: Management, Use and Value of Wetlands. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, A. L. S. 1986. Tranfers and introductions: Do the dangers justify greater public control? p. 375–394.In M. Bilio, H. Rosenthal, and C. J. Sindermann (eds.), Realism in Aquaculture: Achievements, Constraints, Perspectives. European Aquaculture Society, Bredene, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, G., I. G. Anderson, andM. Shariff. 1988. Pathological changes in the tiger prawn,Penaeus monodon, associated with culture in brackish water ponds developed from potentially acid sulfate soils.Journal of Fish Diseases 11:113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, W. E. andE. Heald. 1972. Trophic analysis of an estuarine mangrove community.Bulletin of Marine Science 22:671–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottogall, L., C. Galinie, andA. D. Coxe. 1988. Reproduction in captivity ofPenaeus stylirostris over ten generations in New Caledonia.Journal Aquacultura Tropical 3:111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overstreet, R. M. 1988. Aquatic pollution problems, Southeastern U.S. coasts: Histopathological indicators.Aquatic Toxicology 11:213–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. C., F. S. Conte, W. S. McGrath, andB. V. Miller. 1974. An intensive culture system for penaeid shrimp.Proceedings of the World Mariculture Society 5:65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. C. andH. W. Holcomb, Jr. 1973. Growth and production of brown and white shrimp (Penaeus aztecus andP. setiferus) from experimental ponds in Brazoria and Orange counties, Texas.Proceedings of the World Mariculture Society 4: 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. J., M. C. M. Beveridge, andR. M. Clarke. 1991. Impact of aquaculture on water resources, p. 568–591.In D. E. Brune and J. R. Tomasso (eds.), Aquaculture and Water Quality. Advances in World Aquaculture, Volume 3. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, T. V. R. 1992. Aquaculture and the Environment. Fishing News Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poernomo, A. 1990. Site selection for coastal shrimp ponds, p. 3–19.In M. B. New, H. De Saram, and T. Singh (eds.), Technical and Economic Aspects of Shrimp Farming. Proceedings of the Aquatec '90 Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Pruder, G. D. 1992. Marine shrimp pond effluent: Characterization and environmental impact, p. 187–194.In J. A. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberry, B. 1990. Shrimp farming in the western hemisphere, p. 223–251.In M. B. New, H. De Saram, and T. Singh (eds.), Technical and Economic Aspects of Shrimp Farming. Proceedings of the Aquatec '90 Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  • Rosenberry, B. 1992. Destruction of mangroves and pollution are big problems for Thailand's shrimp farming industry.Aquaculture Digest 17:7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandifer, P. A., J. S. Hopkins, A. D. Stokes, andC. L. Browdy. 1993. Preliminary comparisons of the nativePenaeus setiferus and PacificP. vannamei white shrimp for pond culture in South Carolina, USA.Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 24:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandifer, P. A., A. D. Stokes, andJ. S. Hopkins. 1991. Further intensification of pond shrimp culture in South Carolina, p. 84–96.In P. A. Sandifer (ed.), Shrimp Culture in North America and the Caribbean. Advances in World Aquaculture, World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbordoni, V., G. LaRosa, M. Mattoccia, M. C. Sbordoni, and E. De Matthaeis. 1987. Genetic changes in seven generations of hatchery stocks of the kuruma prawnPenaeus japonicus, p. 143–155.In Proceedings of the World Symposium on Selection, Hybridization and Genetic Engineering in Aquaculture. Volume I. Berlin, Germany.

  • Shahid, M. A. andM. A. H. Pramanik. 1986. The application of remote sensing to study the relationship between the shrimp/fish farms and the mangrove ecosystem of the Bangladesh coastal region. Proceedings of the Regional Seminar on the Application of Remote Sensing Techniques to Coastal Zone Management and Environmental Monitoring. Bangladesh Space Research and Remote Sensing Organization. Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunden, S. L. F. andS. K. Davis. 1991. Evaluation of genetic variation in a domestic population ofPenaeus vannamei: A comparison with three natural populations.Aquaculture 97: 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E. 1977. Intertidal vegetation and commercial yield of penaeid shrimp.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106:411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twilley, R. R. 1989. Impacts of shrimp mariculture practices on the ecology of coastal ecosystems in Ecuador, p. 91–120.In S. Olsen and L. Arriaga (eds.), Establishing a Sustainable Shrimp Mariculture Industry in Ecuador. The University of Rhode Island Coastal Resources Center, Kingston, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uno, Y. 1985. An ecological approach to mariculture of shrimp: Shrimp ranching fisheries, p. 35–45.In Y. Taki, J. H. Primavera, and J. A. Llobrera (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Culture of Penaeid Prawns/Shrimps. Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC), Aquaculture Department, Iloilo, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vu, D-Q. 1992. Shrimp culture industry in Viet Nam. p. 729–756.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.) Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, E. 1992. Accidental escapement of non-native shrimp species: Report of a South Carolina study, p. 173–181.In M. R. DeVoe (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference and Workshop on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Species: Achieving a Balance Between Resource Protection and Economic Development. South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium, Charleston, South Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, D. P. 1991. The effects of aquaculture on indigenous biota, p. 534–567.In D. E. Brune and J. R. Tomasso (eds.), Aquaculture and Water Quality. Advances in World Aquaculture, Volume 3. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R. S. 1967. Experimental rearing of postlarval brown shrimp to marketable size in ponds.Commercial Fisheries Review 29:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R. S. 1968. Culture of penaeid shrimp in brackishwater ponds, 1966–67.Proceedings of Annual Conference Southeastern Association Game and Fish Commissioners 22:387–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, J. M., E. J. Olmi, P. A. Sandifer, andA. D. Stokes. 1988. Management of existing salt-marsh impoundments in South Carolina for shrimp aquaculture and its implications, p. 327–338.In D. D. Hook (ed.), The Ecology and Management of Wetlands, Volume 2: Management, Use and Value of Wetlands. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyban, J. A., J. S. Swingle, J. N. Sweeney, andG. D. Pruder. 1992. Development and commercial performance of high health shrimp using specific pathogen free (SPF) broodstockP. vannamei p. 254–259.In J. Wyban (ed.), Proceedings of the Special Session on Shrimp Farming. World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin, C. J. andY. N. Sheng. 1992. Shrimp culture industry in China, p. 677–689.In A. W. Fast and L. J. Lester (eds.), Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann, D., G. Pruder, andJ-K. Wang. 1990. Aquaculture Effluent Discharge Program—Year 1 Final Report. Prepared for The Center for Tropical and Subtropical Aquaculture. Makapuu Point, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann, D. A., W. A. Walsh, E. G. Saphore, andK. Fulton-Bennett. 1992. A survey of water quality characteristics of effluent from Hawaiian Aquaculture Facilities.Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 23:180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hopkins, J.S., Sandifer, P.A., DeVoe, M.R. et al. Environmental impacts of shrimp farming with special reference to the situation in the continental United States. Estuaries 18, 25–42 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352281

Keywords

Navigation