Skip to main content
Log in

Fouling community dynamics in Lynnhaven Bay, Virginia

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acrylic panels were employed to follow fouling community development at Channel Points, Lynnhaven Bay, Virginia, from April 1977 through March 1979. Panel treatments were devised to study the effects of predator exclusion and panel area on community development. An additional panel was introduced in April 1978 to test the repeatability of initial community development. Early development was similar both years with hydroids, barnacles, and the polychaetePolydora ligni the initial macroinvertebrate colonists. Early community development in both years was dominated by the solitary tunicateMolgula manhattensis. Molgula was able to invade and rapidly overgrow all resident speices except largeBalanus eburneus. Panel area was shown to affect the community structure and development. The community on caged panels (predator exclusion) was significantly different from controls, although the differences could not be unequivocally attributed to predation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Calder, D. R., andM. L. Brehmer. 1967. Seasonal occurrence of epifauna in Hampton Roads, Virginia.Int. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 1:149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. 1961a. The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacleChthamalus stellatus.Ecology 42:710–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. 1961b. Effect of competition, predation byThais lappillus, and other factors on natural populations of the barnacleBalanus balanoides.Ecol. Monogr. 31:61–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. 1972. Community interactions on marine rocky intertidal shores.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3:169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community.Ecol. Monogr. 41:351–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. L. 1946. Season of attachment and growth of sedentary marine organisms at Lamoine, Maine.Ecology 27:150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H. W., andH. Gay. 1945. Season of attachment and growth of sedentary marine organisms at Oakland, California.Ecology 26:375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haderlie, E. C. 1968. Marine fouling organisms in Monterey Harbor.Veliger 10:375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haderlie, E. C. 1969. Marine fouling organisms in Monterey Harbor II. Second year of investigation.Veliger 12:182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. B. C. 1977. Habitat area, colonization, and development of epibenthic community structure, p. 349–358.In B. F. Keegan, P. O. Ceidigh, and P. J. S. Boaden (eds.), Biology of Benthic Organisms. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlson, R. H. 1978. Predation and space utilization in a marine epifaunal community.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 31:225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, E. R. 1974. Marine fouling studies off Oabu, Hawaii.Veliger 7:23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. E. 1958. A study of the types, seasons of attachment, and growth of fouling organisms in the approaches to Norfolk. Virginia, U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, Tech. Rep. 47. 35 p.

  • McDougall, K. D. 1943. Sessile marine invertebrates of Beaufort, North Carolina.Ecol. Monogr. 13:321–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menge, B. A. 1976. Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity.Ecol. Monogr. 46:355–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair, N. B. 1967. The settlement and growth of major fouling organisms in Cochin Harbour.Hydrobiologia 30:503–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, R. J. 1971. Observations on the planktonic larvae ofPolydora ligni Webster (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in the York River, Virginia.Chesapeake Sci. 12:121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, R. W. 1977. The establishment and development of a marine epifaunal community.Ecol. Monogr. 47:37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, R. T. 1966. Food web complexity and species diversity.Am. Nat. 100:65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerat, C. M., andE. R. Reiner. 1942. The influence of surface angle and light on the attachment of barnacles and other sedentary organisms.Biol. Bull. 82:14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerat, C. M., andC. M. Weiss. 1946. The influence of texture and composition of surface on the attachment of sedentary marine organisms.Biol. Bull. 91:57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, A. C., andB. H. Ketchum (eds.) 1952. Marine fouling and its prevention. U.S. Naval Inst., Annapolis, Md. 388 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, B. R., andW. F. Clapp. 1944. A preliminary report on the fouling characteristics of Ponce DeLeon tidal inlet, Daytona Beach, Florida.J. Mar. Res. 5:189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, B. T. 1945. The development of marine fouling communities.Biol. Bull. 89:103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, J. D. 1976. Fouling community structure effects of the hydroidObelia dichotoma on larval recruitment, p. 155–164.In G. O. Mackie (ed.), Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, D. 1978. Resistance of a tunicate of fouling.Biol. Bull. 155:615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. P. 1974. Multiple stable points in natural communities, Am. Nat. 108–873.

  • Sutherland, J. P. 1975. Life histories and the dynamics of fouling communities, p. 137–153.In J. D. Costlow (ed.), The Ecology of Fouling Communities: U.S.-U.S.S.R. Cooperative Program. Office of Naval Research.

  • Sutherland, J. P. 1977. Effect ofSchizoporella (Ectoprocta) removal on the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina, USA, p. 155–176.In B. C. Coull (ed.), Ecology of marine benthos. Univ. South Carolina Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. P. 1978. Functional roles ofSchizoporella andStyela in the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina.Ecology 59:257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. P., andR. H. Karlson. 1973. Succession and seasonal progression in the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina, p. 906–929.In 3d Int. Congr. on Marine Corrosion and Fouling. Northwestern Univ. Press, Evanston, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. P., andR. H. Karlson. 1977. Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina.Ecol. Monogr. 47:425–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W. 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay.Ecology 58:1199–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnstein, R. W. 1978. Predator caging experiments in soft-sediments: caution advised, p. 261–273,In M. L. Wiley (ed.) Estuarine Interactions, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisely, B. 1959. Factors influencing the settling of the principal marine fouling organisms in Sydney Harbour.Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 10:30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodin, S. A. 1974. Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions.Ecol. Monog. 44:171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otsuka, C.M., Dauer, D.M. Fouling community dynamics in Lynnhaven Bay, Virginia. Estuaries 5, 10–22 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352212

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352212

Keywords

Navigation