Abstract
Measurements show that in general salt is vertically well-mixed everywhere in the Great Bay Estuary, New Hampshire except near the river entrances at the head of the estuary. Dyer and Taylor’s (1973) modified version of Ketchum’s segmented tidal prism model has been applied to the Great Bay Estuarine System in order to predict high and low water salinity distribution for a specified river flow. The theory has been modified here to account for the mixing which occurs at the junction of two branches of an estuary. The mixing parameter, which in this model is related to the tidal excursion of water in the estuary, has been determined for different segments in the estuary on the basis of a comparison between predictions and a comprehensive data set obtained for a low river flow period. Using a mixing parameter distribution based on the low river flow calibration procedure the salinity distribution has been predicted for high river flow. The resulting salinity distribution compares favorably with observations for most of the estuary. The corresponding flushing times for water parcels entering at the head of the estuary during periods of low and high river flow is 54.5 and 45.9 tidal cycles respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Arellano, E. 1978. An application of a segmented tidal prism model to the Great Bay Estuarine System. M.S. Thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, 79 p.
Brown, W. S., and E. Arellano. 1979. The application of a segmented tidal mixing model to the Great Bay Estuary, NH. UNH Sea Grant Technical Report UNH SG-162, 47 p.
Dyer, K. R., and P. A. Taylor. 1973. A simple, segmented prism model of tidal mixing in well-mixed estuaries. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 1:411–418.
Hansen, V. D., and M. Rattray, Jr. 1966. New dimensions in estuary classification. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11(3):319–326.
Jackson and Moreland Division of United Engineers and Contractors, Inc. 1969. Piscataqua River at Newington, New Hampshire. Report in support of Application for Water Use Permit.
Ketchum, B. H. 1951. The flushing of tidal estuaries. Sewage Ind. Wastes 23:198–209.
Loder, T. C., and P. M. Gilbert. 1977. Great Bay Estuarine Field Program 1977 Data Report Part III: Nutrient Chemistry. UNH Sea Grant Technical Report UNH SG-159, 1–113.
Riley and Ostericher. 1960. Flushing Study of Portsmouth Harbor, New Hampshire. U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office (Unpublished Manuscript).
Silver, A. L., and W. S. Brown. 1979. The Great Bay Estuarine Field Program 1975 Data Report Part II: Temperature, Salinity and Density. UNH Sea Grant Technical Report UNH SG-163, 59 p.
United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey. 1974. Water Resource Data for Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, Part I. Surface water records Part II. Water Quality Records, 1–423.
United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey. 1975. Water Resources Data for New Hampshire and Vermont. Water Year 1975, U.S. Geological Survey Water Data Report NH-VT-75-1, 1–183.
United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey. 1976. Water Resources Data for New Hampshire and Vermont. Water Year 1976, U.S., 1–195.
United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey. 1977. Water Resources Data for New Hampshire and Vermont. Water Year 1977, U.S. (unpublished).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, W.S., Arellano, E. The application of a segmented tidal mixing model to the Great Bay Estuary, N.H.. Estuaries 3, 248–257 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352080
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352080