Skip to main content
Log in

Longitudinal characterization of a tidal marsh creek separating two hydrographically distinct estuaries

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jones Creek, South Carolina, connects two hydrographically distinct estuarine systems: North Inlet and Winyah Bay. One hundred fifty-two sets of hydrographic measurements from February 1978 indicate the existence of a Jones Creek nodal point, an effective barrier limiting flow exchange between the end regions of the creek. Morphologic and vegetation observations and water quality ratings suggest that this nodal point is a permanent feature of Jones Creek and may be present in other similar systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Bowman, M. J. 1976. The tides of the East River, New York. J. Geophys. Res. 81(9):1609–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. A., F. Culkin, and J. P. Riley. 1967. The electrical conductivity/chlorinity relationship in natural sea water. Deep-Sea Res. 14:203–220.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foerster, J. W. 1968. A portable non-electrical current meter. Chesapeake Sci. 9:52–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjerfve, B. 1975. Velocity averaging in estuaries characterized by a large tidal range to depth ratio. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 3:311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1976. Circulation and salinity distribution in coastal Louisiana bayous. Contrib. Mar. Sci. 20:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1978. Bathymetry as an indicator of net circulation in well mixed estuaries. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23(4):816–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, And J. E. Greer. 1978. Hydrography of the Santee River during moderate discharge conditions. Estuaries 1(2):111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlond, P. H. 1978. On tidal propagation in shallow rivers. J. Geophys. Res. 83(C9):4717–4721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin, R. G., and E. R. Walker. 1972. Salinity calculations from in situ measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 77:6618–6621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. W. 1955. Estuarine circulation patterns. Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 81:717/1–717/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1960. Salt balance and exchange rate for Chincoteague Bay. Chesapeake Sci. 1(1):48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, And W. V. Burt. 1951. An inexpensive and rapid technique for obtaining current profiles in estuarine waters. J. Mar. Res. 10:180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, And G. B. Gardner. 1974. Hydrography of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. Tech. Rept. 85. Chesapeake Bay Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sioli, H. 1966. General features of the delta of the Amazon, p. 381–390. In Scientific Problems of the Humid Tropical Zone Deltas and their Implications. UNESCO.

  • South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. 1978. Water classification standards system for the State of South Carolina.

  • South Carolina Pollution Control Authority. 1972. Stream classifications for the State of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C. 24 p.

  • United States Geological Survey. 1979. Water resources data for South Carolina, water year 1978. Columbia, S.C. 248 p.

  • van de Kreeke, J. 1978. Mass transport in a coastal channel, Marco River, Florida. Estuarine Coastal Mar. Sci. 7:203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 309 of the Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwing, F.B., Kjerfve, B. Longitudinal characterization of a tidal marsh creek separating two hydrographically distinct estuaries. Estuaries 3, 236–241 (1980). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352078

Keywords

Navigation